Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LAUZER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LAUZER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LAUZER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LAUZER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LAUZER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the sibling sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAUZER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAUZER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LAUZER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

There are insufficient data to create the competing sketch figure.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAUZER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAUZER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LAUZER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LAUZER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lauzer-Trudau-Zealot complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes221686926119182kv1rwy0411:24000
Lauzer-Zealot complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes130830190402xcd5wy6301:24000
Ferball-Mantlemine-Lauzer complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes878341050731g9ywy6301:24000
Ferball-Lauzer-Wetsand, frequently flooded complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes888341044231g7kwy6301:24000
Lauzer-Swingstation complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes8081552829250362wdgpwy6301:24000
Swingstation-Lauzer-Yamacall complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes8151456229250372wdgqwy6301:24000
Lauzer-Trudau-Zealot complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes22165231423785292kv1rwy6351:24000
Thibadeau-Lauzer-Zealot complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes11011566014737581lgklwy6351:24000
Lauzer-Zealot-Mountairy complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes22021486414737691lgkywy6351:24000
Squaretop-Foreright-Lauzer complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes53131457714742381lh22wy6351:24000
Lauzer-Fogarty complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes2223578624928222pp2vwy6351:24000
Jewel-Lauzer family-Figuore complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes9332405227716782t6dhwy6351:24000
Lauzer family-Mountairy complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes9331156827716772t6dgwy6351:24000
Lauzer-Fogarty complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes22237126337072pp2vwy66320121:24000
Lauzer-Trudau-Zealot complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes221630835012kv1rwy7231:24000
Lauzer-Fogarty complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes2223136225145652pp2vwy7231:24000
Lauzer-Zealot-Mountairy complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes220217025145571lgkywy7231:24000
Lauzer-Trudau-Zealot complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes22161038925724392kv1rwy7371:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LAUZER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .