Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LATIGO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LATIGO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LATIGO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LATIGO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LATIGO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LATIGO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LATIGO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LATIGO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LATIGO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LATIGO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LATIGO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LATIGO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Zeebar-Latigo complex, 6 to 25 percent slopesZL520128093251qs79id75819981:24000
Blackhorse-Fritz-Latigo complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes12702107028093272mnqkid75819981:24000
Parkalley-Latigo-Zeebar complex, 10 to 30 percent slopesPZD99528093572mpz5id75819981:24000
Latigo gravelly silt loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes1271262228093332mnryid75819981:24000
Latigo-Parkalley complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes1271352728093342mns2id75819981:24000
Ediebench-Latigo complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes1270413328093282mnqvid75819981:24000
Latigo gravelly silt loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes1271011528093322mnrsid75819981:24000
Parkalley-Latigo-Hagenbarth complex, 2 to 35 percent slopesPLD6028093632mtwxid75819981:24000
Latigo gravelly silt loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes12710853424330282mnrsid76120181:24000
Argora-Windicreek-Latigo complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes12700830124329852mnqdid76120181:24000
Parkalley-Latigo-Zeebar complex, 10 to 30 percent slopesPZD701424341872mpz5id76120181:24000
Ediebench-Latigo complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes12704507824329992mnqvid76120181:24000
Latigo gravelly silt loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes12711455424330302mnrvid76120181:24000
Latigo gravelly silt loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes12712364224330332mnryid76120181:24000
Latigo-Parkalley complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes12713320424330372mns2id76120181:24000
Parkalley-Latigo-Hagenbarth complex, 2 to 35 percent slopesPLD256124379612mtwxid76120181:24000
Blackhorse-Fritz-Latigo complex, 5 to 40 percent slopes12702238924329902mnqkid76120181:24000
Small-Latigo complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes12716224924330462mnscid76120181:24000
Zeebar-Latigo complex, 6 to 25 percent slopesZL171216022131qs79id76120181:24000
Zeebar-Latigo-Swampydraw complex, 12 to 40 percent slopes12737170724334642mp6vid76120181:24000
Latigo-Rock outcrop-Swampydraw complex, 1 to 20 percent slopes12720120224330522mnskid76120181:24000
Latigo gravelly silt loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes, boulderyLPD116524341362mpxjid76120181:24000
Latigo-Shagel-Small complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes12717109924330492mnsgid76120181:24000
Latigo-Deadhorse-Small complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes1271597624330452mnsbid76120181:24000
Latigo-Deadhorse-Zeebar complex, 1 to 12 percent slopes1271886124330502mnshid76120181:24000
Longway, stony-Hagenbarth-Latigo complex, 5 to 40 percent slopesRCD55224341902mpz8id76120181:24000
Zeebar-Latigo-Hagenbarth complex, 12 to 40 percent slopes1274052824334672mp6yid76120181:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LATIGO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .