Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LAMBERT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LAMBERT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LAMBERT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
5496P0155S1994ND053457Lambert8Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties47.6505547,-104.0358353
58A40A3717S1971MT111001Lambert7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.9499283,-108.2507477

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LAMBERT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LAMBERT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAMBERT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAMBERT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LAMBERT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAMBERT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAMBERT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LAMBERT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing LAMBERT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lambert-Dimyaw complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesLm1065043420202wbx4mt02119711:24000
Lambert-Rock outcrop, soft complex, 15 to 70 percent slopesLd102754342018cgwvmt02119711:24000
Tinsley-Lambert complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesTg74625342045cgxqmt02119711:24000
Lambert gravelly loam, 20 to 40 percent slopesLa37551342015cgwrmt02119711:24000
Lonna-Lambert complex, 4 to 25 percent slopesCm29973342003cgwcmt02119711:24000
Lambert-Kirby complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesLr26531342021cgwymt02119711:24000
Zahill-Lambert complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesZm21770342065cgycmt02119711:24000
Lambert-Yetull complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesLe17790342019cgwwmt02119711:24000
Lambert-Dimyaw complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes385F187214873381lxpnmt02119711:24000
Hillon-Lambert complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes331F121915965071ql97mt02119711:24000
Lambert-Blanchard complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes382F78614873371lxpmmt02119711:24000
Lambert-Rock outcrop, soft, complex, 15 to 70 percent slopes384F50714873351lxpkmt02119711:24000
Cherry-Lambert complex, 4 to 25 percent slopes214E18214873191lxp1mt02119711:24000
Lambert-Ringling complex, 15 to 65 percent slopes383F2414873391lxppmt02119711:24000
Lambert-Dimyaw complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesLfF1143643453452wbx4mt08319731:24000
Zahill-Lambert complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesZbF88550345378cld7mt08319731:24000
Lambert-Badland complexLc80774345343clc3mt08319731:24000
Lambert-Ringling complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesLhF14006345346clc6mt08319731:24000
Lambert-Blanchard complex, 8 to 25 percent slopesLeD8985345344clc4mt08319731:24000
Lambert gravelly loam, 15 to 40 percent slopesLaE5956345340clc0mt08319731:24000
Lambert-Zahill complex, 20 to 50 percent slopesLcF54233348856cq0fmt09119711:24000
Lambert-Shale outcrop complex, 15 to 65 percent slopesLbF19637348855cq0dmt09119711:24000
Lambert silty clay loam, 4 to 8 percent slopesLaC3872348853cq0bmt09119711:24000
Wabek-Lambert complex, 15 to 35 percent slopesWbE3075348877cq13mt09119711:24000
Lambert silty clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesLaD2452348854cq0cmt09119711:24000
Lambert silty clay loam, 2 to 4 percent slopesLaB674348852cq09mt09119711:24000
Lambert soils, 7 to 35 percent slopesLd14559345755clsdmt11119661:20000
Lambert-Badland-Cabba complex, 6 to 45 percent slopesE3185F248127071001vzvgnd00719981:24000
Lambert-Vanda, high precipitation-Rhoades, barren complex, 0 to 9 percent slopesE3247C27827071021vzvlnd00719981:24000
Lambert-Lambert, gullied complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesE3245D26825635722q527nd01119691:20000
Lambert silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesE3241B892563570d32xnd01119691:20000
Lambert silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesE3241D2425635712q526nd01119691:20000
Lambert-Vanda, high precipitation-Rhoades, barren complex, 0 to 9 percent slopesE3247C497927072261vzvlnd02519811:20000
Lambert-Badland-Cabba complex, 6 to 45 percent slopesE3185F38527584861vzvgnd02519811:20000
Lambert-Badland-Cabba complex, 6 to 45 percent slopesE3185F115627073041vzvgnd03319851:24000
Cherry-Lambert, gullied-Havrelon, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE3235B2152759750d32snd03319851:24000
Lambert-Badland-Cabba complex, 6 to 45 percent slopesE3185F16825258461vzvgnd03719851:20000
Lambert-Badland-Cabba complex, 6 to 45 percent slopesE3185F1204727150951vzvgnd05320031:24000
Lambert-Vanda, high precipitation-Rhoades, barren complex, 0 to 9 percent slopesE3247C350227151021vzvlnd05320031:24000
Lambert silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesE3241B14282715101d32xnd05320031:24000
Cherry-Lambert, gullied-Havrelon, occasionally flooded complex, 0 to 6 percent slopesE3235B12352715100d32snd05320031:24000
Lambert-Brandenburg complex, 2 to 25 percent slopesE3027E5852715089d32ynd05320031:24000
Lambert-Vanda, high precipitation-Rhoades, barren complex, 0 to 9 percent slopesE3247C214226992761vzvlnd05719761:20000
Lambert silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopesE3241D129027158532q526nd08719741:20000
Lambert-Vanda, high precipitation-Rhoades, barren complex, 0 to 9 percent slopesE3247C45827158551vzvlnd08719741:20000
Lambert-Lambert, gullied complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesE3245D42327158542q527nd08719741:20000
Lambert silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopesE3241B2292715852d32xnd08719741:20000
Lambert-Badland-Cabba complex, 6 to 45 percent slopesE3185F171917135501vzvgnd08919651:20000
Lambert-Vanda, high precipitation-Rhoades, barren complex, 0 to 9 percent slopesE3247C102627159991vzvlnd08919651:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LAMBERT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .