Soil Data Explorer - LAKEPARK

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LAKEPARK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LAKEPARK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LAKEPARK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
102A	UMN3885	S1983MN0053885	Lakepark	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	46.8479996,-96.1699982

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LAKEPARK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LAKEPARK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAKEPARK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAKEPARK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LAKEPARK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAKEPARK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAKEPARK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LAKEPARK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. MN-2010-09-08-19 | Otter Tail County - 2001

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Barnes-Langhei-Lakepark association (Soil Survey of Otter Tail County, Minnesota; 2001).

2. MN-2010-09-10-17 | Swift County -

   Esmond-Heimdal-Lakepark association (Soil Survey of Swift County, Minnesota).

3. MN-2010-09-27-02 | Lac qui Parle County -

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Esmond-Heimdahl-Parnell association (Soil Survey of Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota).

Map Units

Map units containing LAKEPARK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Quam-Cathro-Lakepark complex, 0 to2 percent slopes, frequently ponded	J132A	4544	3182506	2yw53	mn005	1994	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	1938	1791	397496	2v450	mn005	1994	1:20000
Aazdahl-Quam-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J112B	1496	3182509	2yw57	mn005	1994	1:20000
Aazdahl-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J111B	830	3182504	2yw50	mn005	1994	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	36	3058	396087	2v450	mn011	1990	1:20000
Quam-Cathro-Lakepark complex, 0 to2 percent slopes, frequently ponded	J132A	457	3182524	2yw53	mn011	1990	1:20000
Aazdahl-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J111B	354	3182522	2yw50	mn011	1990	1:20000
Aazdahl-Quam-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J112B	336	3182527	2yw57	mn011	1990	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	J64A	1490	2423063	2v450	mn023	1980	1:15840
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	36	1667	356963	2v450	mn027	1980	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	Fa	25288	397276	2v450	mn041	1970	1:12000
Quam-Cathro-Lakepark complex, 0 to2 percent slopes, frequently ponded	J132A	3638	3182542	2yw53	mn051	1974	1:20000
Aazdahl-Quam-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J112B	1410	3182545	2yw57	mn051	1974	1:20000
Aazdahl-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J111B	1062	3182540	2yw50	mn051	1974	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	36	772	398043	2v450	mn051	1974	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	J49A	5584	2945722	2v450	mn067	1983	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	1938	11386	430267	2v450	mn073	1994	1:20000
Lakepark-Roliss-Parnell, depressional, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	J107A	21065	1542319	1nrx7	mn081	2007	1:12000
Lakepark clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, overwash	J99A	5507	1150562	17m7x	mn081	2007	1:12000
Lakepark-Roliss-Parnell, depressional, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	J107A	19348	1542324	1nrxd	mn083	2008	1:12000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	36	8437	399230	2v450	mn087	1992	1:20000
Lakepark-Roliss-Parnell, depressional, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	J107A	18098	1542327	1nrxh	mn101	2008	1:12000
Lakepark clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, overwash	J99A	3742	1292321	1dcrs	mn101	2008	1:12000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	Fm	4076	357227	2v450	mn107	1970	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	1237	13390	435576	2v450	mn111	1996	1:20000
Quam-Cathro-Lakepark complex, 0 to2 percent slopes, frequently ponded	J132A	2553	3182560	2yw53	mn111	1996	1:20000
Aazdahl-Quam-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J112B	2015	3182563	2yw57	mn111	1996	1:20000
Aazdahl-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J111B	947	3182558	2yw50	mn111	1996	1:20000
Lakepark-Roliss-Parnell, depressional, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	J107A	2819	1481610	1lqqw	mn117	2005	1:12000
Lakepark clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, overwash	J99A	2640	1292313	1dcrj	mn117	2005	1:12000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	Pf	24089	401390	2v450	mn121	1968	1:20000
Aazdahl-Quam-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J112B	119	3182581	2yw57	mn121	1968	1:20000
Aazdahl-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J111B	98	3182576	2yw50	mn121	1968	1:20000
Quam-Cathro-Lakepark complex, 0 to2 percent slopes, frequently ponded	J132A	94	3182578	2yw53	mn121	1968	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	36	32090	428128	2v450	mn145	1980	1:15840
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	Pf	1675	428366	2v450	mn149	1966	1:15840
Quam-Cathro-Lakepark complex, 0 to2 percent slopes, frequently ponded	J132A	1656	3182596	2yw53	mn149	1966	1:15840
Aazdahl-Quam-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J112B	927	3182599	2yw57	mn149	1966	1:15840
Aazdahl-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J111B	462	3182594	2yw50	mn149	1966	1:15840
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	J49A	16109	434836	2v450	mn151	2000	1:12000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	36	5769	428530	2v450	mn153	1985	1:20000
Quam-Cathro-Lakepark complex, 0 to2 percent slopes, frequently ponded	J132A	765	3182614	2yw53	mn155	1986	1:20000
Aazdahl-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J111B	126	3182612	2yw50	mn155	1986	1:20000
Aazdahl-Quam-Lakepark complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes	J112B	84	3182617	2yw57	mn155	1986	1:20000
Lakepark-Roliss-Parnell, depressional, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	J107A	2381	1542330	1nrxl	mn173	1979	1:20000
Lakepark-Parnell, occasionally ponded, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	J49A	1137	2945741	2v450	sd051	1977	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LAKEPARK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).