Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LAGUNITA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LAGUNITA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LAGUNITA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
3081P036981AZ015004Lagunita7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties34.9661102,-114.6080551

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LAGUNITA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LAGUNITA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAGUNITA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAGUNITA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LAGUNITA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the LAGUNITA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the LAGUNITA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LAGUNITA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. AZ-2011-05-27-08 | Colorado River Indian Reservation - 1986

    Soil landscape profile (Soil Survey of Colorado River Indian, Reservation, Arizona; 1986)

  2. AZ-2011-05-27-12 | Gila Bend-Ajo Area - 1997

    An idealized soil-landscape profile of the Maricopa Mountains (Soil Survey of Gila Bend-Ajo Area, Arizona; 1997).

  3. AZ-2012-05-09-01 | Colorado River Indian Reservation - November 1986

    Soil landscape profile (Soil Survey of Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona—California; November 1986).

Map Units

Map units containing LAGUNITA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lagunita sand, 0 to 1 percent slopes711856015079341mm41az62720051:24000
Lagunita-Ripley complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes72674015079351mm42az62720051:24000
Indio-Lagunita-Ripley complex1655162532631sf5az64919781:24000
Lagunita loamy sand1810901532651sf7az64919781:24000
Lagunita silt loam193418532661sf8az64919781:24000
Cuerda-Why-Lagunita complex125316534291sljaz65319851:24000
Lagunita-Vint complex433207534631smmaz65319851:24000
Lagunita loamy sand, strongly saline, 0 to 5 percent slopes2110848547861v09az65619831:20000
Lagunita sandy loam20A1804921298zxp9az65619831:20000
Lagunita loamy sand20715547851v08az65619831:20000
Lagunita clay loam20B429921304zxphaz65619831:20000
Lagunita silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes22955542831th2az65819911:24000
Lagunita clay loam20B513987681hyjkca68119681:24000
Lagunita sandy loam20A513987671hyjjca68119681:24000
Rositas-Lagunita frequently ponded complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes115916034416122y0mrca8031:24000
Rizzo-Rositas-Lagunita very rarely flooded complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes15DD508534416172ywzxca8031:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LAGUNITA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .