Soil Data Explorer - LACRESCENT

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the LACRESCENT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of LACRESCENT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to LACRESCENT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
105	UMN1357	S1971MN0491357	LaCrescent	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	44.4143639,-92.9088898
105	UMN2756	S1978MN0552756	LaCrescent	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.689167,-91.5344467
105	X3-840G-1	S1987IA005003	LaCrescent	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	43.4114631,-91.5131075
n/a	X49-000-X	S1988IA097927	LaCrescent	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the LACRESCENT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the LACRESCENT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the LACRESCENT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the LACRESCENT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with LACRESCENT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the LACRESCENT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the LACRESCENT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with LACRESCENT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. IA-2010-09-02-03 | Allamakee County - 1998

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lacrescent-Fayette-Village association (Soil Survey of Allamakee County, Iowal 1998).

2. IA-2010-09-09-26 | Winneshiek County - 2007

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Fayette-Lacrescent-Village association (Soil Survey of Winneshiek County, Iowa; 2007).

3. IA-2010-09-09-27 | Winneshiek County - 2007

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Fayette-Lacrescent association (Soil Survey of Winneshiek County, Iowa; 2007).

4. IA-2011-05-31-03 | Allamakee County - 1958

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lacrescent-Fayette-Village association (Soil Survey of Allamakee County, Iowa; 1958).

5. IA-2011-05-31-52 | Jackson County - 1992

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Derinda-Fayette association (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Iowa; 1992).

6. IA-2011-05-31-54 | Jackson County - 1992

   A cross section indicating the major kinds of parent material in Jackson County (Soil Survey of Jackson County, Iowa; 1992).

7. IL-2010-09-01-31 | Jo Daviess County - 1996

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Dubuque-Lacrescent-Dunbarton association (Soil Survey of Jo Daviess County, Illinois; 1996).

8. IL-2010-09-01-33 | Jo Daviess County - 1996

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Eleroy-Derinda association (Soil Survey of Jo Daviess County, Illinois; 1996).

9. IL-2011-08-04-33 | Jo Daviess County - 1996

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Dubuque-Lacrescent-Dunbarton association (Soil Survey of Jo Daviess County, Illinois; 1996).

10. IL-2011-08-04-34 | Jo Daviess County - 1996

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Eleroy-Derinda association (Soil Survey of Jo Daviess County, Illinois; 1996).

11. IL-2011-08-04-35 | Jo Daviess County - 1996

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the NewGlarus-Lamoille-Lacrescent association (Soil Survey of Jo Daviess County, Illinois; 1996).

Map Units

Map units containing LACRESCENT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Lacrescent silt loam, 25 to 70 percent slopes	840G	51996	402566	fhx0	ia005	1992	1:15840
Lacrescent silt loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes	840F	746	402565	fhwz	ia005	1992	1:15840
Lacrescent silt loam, 14 to 18 percent slopes	840E	178	402564	fhwy	ia005	1992	1:15840
Dorerton-Lacrescent complex, 18 to 60 percent slopes	799G	4627	407561	fp34	ia097	1988	1:15840
Lacrescent cobbly silty clay loam, 18 to 45 percent slopes	840G	17652	1400309	1j048	ia191	2005	1:12000
Lacrescent cobbly silty clay loam, 5 to 18 percent slopes	840E	71	1429109	1jz39	ia191	2005	1:12000
Lacrescent channery silt loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes	785G	1247	2378660	2kv5z	il001	1997	1:12000
Lacrescent channery silt loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes	785G	712	2542041	2qrb1	il013	1986	1:15840
Lacrescent cobbly loam, 25 to 60 percent slopes	785G	48	995997	12fdy	il015	2005	1:12000
Lacrescent channery silt loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes	785G	829	211785	73cs	il061	1968	1:15840
Hamburg-Lacrescent complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes	836G	382	2542257	2qxs0	il061	1968	1:15840
Lacrescent channery silt loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes	785G	1558	175216	5wb4	il067	1993	1:15840
Lacrescent silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes	785C	160	175215	5wb3	il067	1993	1:15840
Rock outcrop, limestone-Lacrescent complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes	837G	996	728474	sg15	il083	2002	1:12000
Hamburg-Lacrescent complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes	836G	856	728473	sg14	il083	2002	1:12000
Lacrescent cobbly silt loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes	785G	18983	2229443	2dtxj	il085	1990	1:12000
Lacrescent cobbly silt loam, 18 to 35 percent slopes	785F	9534	2229445	2dtxl	il085	1990	1:12000
Lacrescent flaggy silt loam, 35 to 70 percent slopes	785G	644	184116	65l7	il133	1998	1:12000
Lacrescent channery silt loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes	785G	612	201313	6rgz	il149	2001	1:12000
Lacrescent cobbly loam, 25 to 60 percent slopes	785G	671	793093	vm8n	il195	2003	1:12000
Frontenac-Lacrescent complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes, rocky	N639G	21124	2372351	2kmmg	mn045	2008	1:12000
Frontenac-Lacrescent complex, 20 to 45 percent slopes, rocky	N639F	9172	2372349	2kmmd	mn045	2008	1:12000
Lacrescent, flaggy-Frontenac-Rock outcrop complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes	N640G	1478	2375814	2kr75	mn045	2008	1:12000
Frontenac-Lacrescent complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes, rocky	N639G	16308	1713087	1vhlw	mn049	2007	1:12000
Frontenac-Lacrescent complex, 20 to 45 percent slopes, rocky	N639F	4045	1713084	1vhls	mn049	2007	1:12000
Lacrescent, flaggy-Frontenac-Rock outcrop complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes	N640G	778	1713086	1vhlv	mn049	2007	1:12000
Lacrescent cobbly silty clay loam, 45 to 70 percent slopes	457G	27444	398281	fcfs	mn055	1981	1:15840
Lacrescent flaggy silt loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes	457E	1283	398280	fcfr	mn055	1981	1:15840
Frontenac-Lacrescent complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes, rocky	N639G	32528	2216212	2dd4q	mn157	2008	1:12000
Frontenac-Lacrescent complex, 20 to 45 percent slopes, rocky	N639F	4175	2216209	2dd4m	mn157	2008	1:12000
Lacrescent, flaggy-Frontenac-Rock outcrop complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes	N640G	1527	2216210	2dd4n	mn157	2008	1:12000
Lacrescent silt loam, rocky, 45 to 70 percent slopes	457G	40658	429052	gdgd	mn169	1987	1:20000
Lacrescent-Rock outcrop complex, 45 to 70 percent slopes	832G	2775	429098	gdhw	mn169	1987	1:20000
Lacrescent-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes	832F	1209	429097	gdhv	mn169	1987	1:20000
Lacrescent channery silt loam, 20 to 45 percent slopes	457E	1028	429051	gdgc	mn169	1987	1:20000
Lacrescent-Dunbarton complex, very stony, 30 to 60 percent slopes	1130F	5908	2495357	2lk96	wi023	1960	1:12000
Lacrescent-Dunbarton complex, very stony, 30 to 60 percent slopes	1130F	1149	2809841	2lk96	wi025	1972	1:15840
Lacrescent-Dunbarton complex, very stony, 30 to 60 percent slopes	1130F	40553	2809831	2lk96	wi043	1959	1:20000
Brodale, deep-Lacrescent, very stony-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes	1150G	3344	3119023	2xvsj	wi043	1959	1:20000
Lacrescent-Dunbarton complex, very stony, 30 to 60 percent slopes	1130F	2575	2809847	2lk96	wi045	1969	1:12000
Lacrescent-Dunbarton complex, very stony, 30 to 60 percent slopes	1130F	12746	2561807	2lk96	wi049	1960	1:20000
Lacrescent-Dunbarton complex, very stony, 30 to 60 percent slopes	1130F	2416	2561808	2lk96	wi065	1964	1:15840
Lacrescent-Dunbarton complex, 20 to 30 percent slopes, very stony	1130E	669	2809837	2sb85	wi065	1964	1:15840
Lacrescent-Dunbarton complex, very stony, 30 to 60 percent slopes	1130F	761	2495358	2lk96	wi123	1965	1:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the LACRESCENT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).