Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the KLEJ soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of KLEJ, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to KLEJ were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
153D95P031894NJ001005Klej6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5215263,-74.5935593
153D95P031994NJ001006Klej5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5217781,-74.5939407
153D00P106099DE005001_KlejKlej7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.5617485,-75.108223

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the KLEJ soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the KLEJ series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the KLEJ series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KLEJ series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with KLEJ share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the KLEJ series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KLEJ series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with KLEJ, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. FL-2012-04-25-03 | Gadsden County - January 1961

    Geologic formations and some principal soils in relative positions (Soil Survey of Gadsden County, Florida; January 1961).

  2. FL-2012-04-26-27 | Washington County - May 1965

    Geologic formations of Washington County and the position of most soil series (Soil Survey of Washington County, Florida; May 1965).

  3. MA-2012-02-01-12 | Dukes County - September 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Carver general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Dukes County, Massachusetts; September 1986).

  4. MA-2012-02-01-13 | Dukes County - September 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Riverhead-Carver-Haven general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Dukes County, Massachusetts; September 1986).

  5. MD-2010-09-10-09 | Somerset County -

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Parsonsburg Sand Formation (Soil Survey of Somerset County, Maryland).

  6. MD-2010-09-10-12 | Wicomico County -

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in general soil map units 1 and 4 (Soil Survey of Wicomico County, Maryland).

  7. MD-2012-02-03-31 | Wicomico County - January 1970

    Cross section showing typical soil pattern in the Fallsington-Woodstown-Sassafras association (Soil Survey of Wicomico County, Maryland; January 1970).

  8. MD-2012-02-03-32 | Wicomico County - January 1970

    Cross section showing typical soil pattern in the Evesboro-Klej association (Soil Survey of Wicomico County, Maryland; January 1970).

  9. MD-2012-02-03-34 | Worcester County - May 1973

    Cross section showing typical soil pattern in the Fallingston-Woodstown-Sassafras association (Soil Survey of Worcester County, Maryland; May 1973).

  10. MD-2012-02-03-36 | Worcester County - May 1973

    Cross section showing typical soil pattern in the Lakeland-Klej-Plummer association (Soil Survey of Worcester County, Maryland; May 1973).

  11. SC-2012-03-14-04 | Bamberg County - January 1966

    Soil series in soil association 4 and their relation to the landscape and underlying material (Soil Survey of Bamberg County, SC; 1966).

  12. SC-2012-03-14-30 | Marlboro County - November 1965

    Major soils in association 7 and their general location on the landscape (Soil Survey of Marlboro County, SC; 1965).

  13. TX-2012-03-21-12 | Jefferson County - February 1965

    Relative position of the major soils of the East Texas timberlands (Soil Survey of Jefferson County, TX; 1965).

Map Units

Map units containing KLEJ as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Klej loamy fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesKlB21715328156c0gpal00319611:20000
Klej loamy fine sand, 5 to 8 percent slopesKlC1139328157c0gqal00319611:20000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB21616060831qx84de00120061:24000
Klej loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesKsA15616060821qx83de00120061:24000
Klej loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesKsA1535816034401qthwde00520061:24000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB432616034361qthrde00520061:24000
Klej fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesKfA307512463345pfga19119601:20000
Klej loamy fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesKgA185324971bx4yga28319621:20000
Klej (leefield) sand, shallow, 0 to 2 percent slopesKiA18515125083464yga30519621:20000
Klej (albany) sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesKhA7285125082464xga30519621:20000
Klej loamy coarse sand, sandy substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopes297A109427668698xcma00719831:20000
Klej and Pompton soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes295A6512769869971ma01919771:20000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB195324526762nb6lmd01120091:12000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB56411289504b5pmd01919921:15840
Klej loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesKz57212832549jjmd03719751:20000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB85014079691j83cmd03920061:12000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB31117125901vh2vmd04120091:12000
Klej-Galloway complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKgB1535797557311r53md04520051:12000
Klej loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesKsA70311293184bkkmd04719951:12000
Klej loamy sand, 2 to 5 percent slopesKsB34331293194bklmd04719951:12000
Klej loamy sandKj151296074bvwmd60119981:12000
Klej loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopesKkgkB12614239861jss1nj02319851:24000
Klej loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesKkgB2614239851jss0nj02319851:24000
Klej loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopesKkgB794714232901js1lnj02519851:24000
Klej loamy sand-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesKkhB501114232931js1pnj02519851:24000
Urban land-Klej complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesUSKLEA388531738482ywgrnj02519851:24000
Klej loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopesKkgkB157814232921js1nnj02519851:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the KLEJ soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .