Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the KISHWALK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of KISHWALK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to KISHWALK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the KISHWALK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the KISHWALK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the KISHWALK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KISHWALK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with KISHWALK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the KISHWALK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KISHWALK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with KISHWALK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing KISHWALK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Prill-Kishwalk complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes184C55334262052nb2xor6181:24000
Gwinly-Kishwalk-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes163E40034262001hh7for6181:24000
Gwinly-Kishwalk-Finsel complex, 2 to 50 percent slopes166E3123426420znhvor6181:24000
Kaskela-Kishwalk-Gwinly complex, landslides, 2 to 40 percent south slopes171E23734262032rchfor6181:24000
Kishwalk-Kaskela-Gwinly complex, landslides, 5 to 35 percent north slopes173D20934262042lpdfor6181:24000
Hutchley-Kishwalk-Finsel complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes4324NO763385407znj5or62620181:24000
Gwinly-Kishwalk-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes4057CO3233853251hh7for62620181:24000
Kishwalk-Gwinly-Tanksel complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes4320NO53385401vyl1or62620181:24000
Hutchley-Kishwalk-Finsel complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes212E180573426043znj5or6271:24000
Gwinly-Kishwalk-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes163E1367634250891hh7for6271:24000
Kishwalk-Gwinly-Tanksel complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes193E100783426046vyl1or6271:24000
Ateron-Kishwalk-Finsel complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes231E227534263632m79dor6271:24000
Gwinly-Kishwalk-Finsel complex, 2 to 50 percent slopes166E16893426417znhvor6271:24000
Kishwalk-Gwinly-Tanksel complex, 15 to 50 percent south slopes178E12834250872dvgpor6271:24000
Waterbury-Kishwalk complex, 2 to 30 percent slopes15468786315323q6or67419931:24000
Kishwalk-Waterbury complex, 30 to 55 percent slopes6044616333123wyor67419931:24000
Sagley-Kishwalk complex, 30 to 55 percent slopes12213826309023n5or67419931:24000
Kishwalk very cobbly silt loam, 55 to 80 percent slopes5910306332923wwor67419931:24000
Sagley-Kishwalk complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes1216486308823n3or67419931:24000
Gwinly-Kishwalk-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes163E2088333916301hh7for6771:24000
Kishwalk-Gwinly-Tanksel complex, 15 to 50 percent south slopes178E1477233849892dvgpor6771:24000
Kishwalk-Kaskela-Gwinly complex, landslides, 5 to 35 percent north slopes173D1258333916412lpdfor6771:24000
Prill-Kishwalk complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes184C820533849882nb2xor6771:24000
Kaskela-Kishwalk-Gwinly complex, landslides, 2 to 40 percent south slopes171E676433916482rchfor6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the KISHWALK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .