Soil Data Explorer - KILARC

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the KILARC soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of KILARC, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to KILARC were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
18	UCD7345113	73-CA-45-113x	KILARC	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.620224,-121.9512787
22B	UCD6245139	62-CA-45-139x	KILARC	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.0306587,-121.9190216
5	UCD7253005	72-CA-53-005x	KILARC	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.5572815,-123.1674957

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the KILARC soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the KILARC series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the KILARC series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the KILARC series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with KILARC share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the KILARC series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KILARC series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with KILARC, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing KILARC as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Kilarc gravelly silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	221	340	487032	jbsq	ca604	1994	1:24000
Kilarc gravelly silt loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes	220	251	487030	jbsn	ca604	1994	1:24000
Kilarc very stony sandy clay loam, 10 to 30 percent slopes	KlD	12886	460038	hfpy	ca607	1967	1:20000
Kilarc very stony sandy clay loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes	KlE	5453	460039	hfpz	ca607	1967	1:20000
Kilarc sandy clay loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	KhD	4023	460036	hfpw	ca607	1967	1:20000
Kilarc sandy clay loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes	KhE	2050	460037	hfpx	ca607	1967	1:20000
Kilarc gravelly silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	221im	723	2375773	jbsq	ca607	1967	1:20000
Kilarc sandy clay loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes	KhC	584	460035	hfpv	ca607	1967	1:20000
Kilarc-Sites complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes	KsD	270	460040	hfq0	ca607	1967	1:20000
Kilarc gravelly silt loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes	220im	9	2375772	jbsn	ca607	1967	1:20000
Kilarc gravelly silt loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes	222im	137	1899224	21r99	ca703	1983	1:24000
Kilarc gravelly silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	221im	65	1868932	20qs4	ca707	1983	1:24000
Kilarc very stony sandy clay loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes	KlEsh	56	1868414	20q7f	ca707	1983	1:24000
Kilarc sandy clay loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	KhDsh	20	1868412	20q7c	ca707	1983	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the KILARC soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).