Soil Data Explorer - KERSHAW

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the KERSHAW soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of KERSHAW, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to KERSHAW were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
133A	S37_016	1977-FL073-S37_016	Kershaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	30.3693008,-84.1846161
138	81P0456	81FL121001	Kershaw	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	30.3002319,-82.9165421
152A	S19_002	1986-FL037-S19_002	Kershaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	29.9327831,-84.3950424
152A	S21_009	1987-FL041-S21_009	Kershaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	29.74823,-82.7595673
153A	S16_007	1974-FL031-S16_007	Kershaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	30.3608685,-81.4901657

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the KERSHAW soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the KERSHAW series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the KERSHAW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the KERSHAW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with KERSHAW share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the KERSHAW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the KERSHAW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with KERSHAW, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. FL-2011-05-31-09 | City of Jacksonville, Duval County - 1978

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in an area of the Leon-Hurricane/Ridgewood-Ortega general soil map unit. This map unit is dominantly used for urban development (Soil Survey of City of Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida; 1978).

Map Units

Map units containing KERSHAW as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Kershaw sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes	25	215	1444883	1khj4	fl003	1991	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes	56	14800	132842	4g77	fl019	1986	1:24000
Urban land-Ortega-Kershaw complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	72	10910	738884	ssvz	fl031	1996	1:24000
Kershaw fine sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	25	2120	738837	sstg	fl031	1996	1:24000
Kershaw fine sand, smoothed, 0 to 2 percent slopes	26	315	738838	ssth	fl031	1996	1:24000
Kershaw sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes	17	4787	1477068	1ll0c	fl037	1990	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 5 to 12 percent slopes	18	821	1477069	1ll0d	fl037	1990	1:20000
Kershaw fine sand, gently rolling	18	11700	321800	bsvn	fl041	1989	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	18	21720	1454425	1ktfy	fl073	1989	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes	19	3370	1454426	1ktfz	fl073	1989	1:20000
Kershaw-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	20	440	1454428	1ktg1	fl073	1989	1:20000
Kershaw fine sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	31	930	132919	4g9q	fl089	1989	1:15840
Kershaw fine sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes	21	10660	1425215	1jv1p	fl123	1998	1:24000
Kershaw sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	19	500	1399045	1hyth	fl129	1988	1:24000
Kershaw coarse sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KkC	6525	324543	bwq4	ga031	1965	1:20000
Kershaw coarse sand, 2 to 12 percent slopes	KeC	13385	324769	bwyf	ga107	1993	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KdC	1820	324813	bwzv	ga165	1966	1:20000
Kershaw coarse sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	KkB	2815	124922	45zr	ga229	1965	1:20000
Kershaw coarse sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KeC	308	324938	bx3w	ga277	1979	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KdC	3735	125138	466q	ga601	1969	1:20000
Kershaw coarse sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KeC	18685	125175	467x	ga602	1983	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 2 to 12 percent slopes	KeC	2390	325157	bxby	ga603	1981	1:20000
Kershaw coarse sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KkC	6963	325207	bxdk	ga608	1965	1:20000
Kershaw coarse sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KkC	5665	125381	46gk	ga613	1969	1:20000
Kershaw-Osier complex	Kic	5130	125380	46gj	ga613	1969	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KeC	37420	325531	bxr0	ga617	1976	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	KdB	10660	325558	bxrw	ga627	1970	1:20000
Kershaw coarse sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KeC	807	325597	bxt4	ga631	1978	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 2 to 10 percent slopes	KeC	12303	125809	46xc	ga644	1980	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes	KdC	9350	326057	by8z	ga647	1970	1:20000
Kershaw sand, moderately steep phase (lakeland)	Ka	20	567757	m1sr	ms033	1955	1:24000
Kershaw sand, 0 to 10 percent slopes	KeC	1127	130520	4ctb	sc063	1972	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 2 to 10 percent slopes	KeC	2029	131106	4df7	sc079	1976	1:20000
Kershaw sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	30	462	575961	mbbd	tx471	1975	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the KERSHAW soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).