Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the KEOMAH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of KEOMAH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to KEOMAH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
108A84IL1831301984IL183130Keomah2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.097825,-87.7010889
108A84IL1831421984IL183142Keomah2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1399111,-87.5733417
108B40A15161960IL021002Keomah6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5847206,-89.3708344
108B77IL0730141977IL073014Keomah1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.1546634,-90.4291151
108B81P02111978IL137002Keomah6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5378151,-89.9739838
108C04N0285S2003IA183002Keomah7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.3163071,-91.8953018
115C58IL1130011958IL113001Keomah5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.5501121,-89.2090906
115C58IL2030011958IL203001Keomah5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.8113092,-89.4399568
115C81IL0090661981IL009066Keomah1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.9261596,-90.7055388
n/a77IL0950651977IL095065Keomah1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the KEOMAH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the KEOMAH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the KEOMAH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KEOMAH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with KEOMAH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the KEOMAH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the KEOMAH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with KEOMAH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IA-2010-09-02-16 | Jefferson County - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Clinton-Lindley-Ashgrove association (Soil Survey of Jefferson County, Iowa; 1999).

  2. IA-2011-05-31-57 | Jefferson County - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Clinton-Lindley-Ashgrove association (Soil Survey of Jefferson County, Iowa; 1999).

  3. IA-2011-06-01-07 | Louisa County - 1980

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Clinton-Lindley association (Soil Survey of Louisa County, Iowa; 1980).

  4. IL-2010-09-01-18 | Fulton County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Keomah-Clarksdale association (Soil Survey of Fulton County, Illinois; 2003).

  5. IL-2010-09-01-23 | Fulton County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Keomah-Camden association (Soil Survey of Fulton County, Illinois; 2003).

  6. IL-2010-09-01-27 | Hancock County - 2001

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Hickory-Clarksdale association (Soil Survey of Hancock County, Illinois; 2001).

  7. IL-2010-09-01-44 | Marshall County - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Keomah association (Soil Survey of Marshall County, Illinois; 2002).

  8. IL-2010-09-01-54 | McDonough County - 1997

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Hickory-Rozetta-Elco association (Soil Survey of McDonough County, Illinois; 1997).

  9. IL-2010-09-01-65 | Schuyler County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Keomah-Rozetta-Fishhook association (Soil Survey of Schuyler County, Illinois; 2003).

  10. IL-2010-09-01-67 | Schuyler County - 2003

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Fayette-Sylvan association (Soil Survey of Schuyler County, Illinois; 2003).

  11. IL-2010-09-01-83 | Woodford County - 1999

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Keomah-Rozetta association (Soil Survey of Woodford County, Illinois; 1999).

  12. IL-2010-09-24-07 | Christian County -

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Rozetta-Hickory-Keomah association (Soil Survey of Christian County, Illinois).

  13. IL-2011-06-01-02 | Brown County - 1988

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Keomah-Rozetta association (Soil Survey of Brown County, Illinois; 1988).

  14. IL-2011-06-01-06 | Brown County - 1988

    Typical cross section showing the relationship of parent material to soils in Brown County (Soil Survey of Brown County, Illinois; 1988).

  15. IL-2011-08-03-15 | Christian County - 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Hickory-Keomah association (Soil Survey of Christian County, Illinois; 1994).

  16. IL-2011-08-04-05 | De Witt County - 1991

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Birkbeck-Russell-Keomah association (Soil Survey of De Witt County, Illinois; 1991).

  17. IL-2011-08-04-81 | Peoria County - 1992

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Keomah-Sylvan and Hickory-Strawn-Marseilles associations (Soil Survey of Peoria County, Illinois; 1992).

Map Units

Map units containing KEOMAH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Keomah silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes1807282405223flnqia05719801:15840
Keomah silt loam benches 2 to 5 percent slopes1180B846406799fn9kia08719821:15840
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes180B463406824fnbcia08719821:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes180336406823fnbbia08719821:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes180102452953h6bdia09520051:12000
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes180B410407750fp97ia10119921:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes180175407749fp96ia10119921:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes180311447045h05tia10719981:12000
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes180B1342408443fq0lia11119761:15840
Keomah silt loam, benches, 2 to 5 percent slopes1180B1050408417fpzria11119761:15840
Keomah silt loam, benches, 0 to 2 percent slopes1180843408416fpzqia11119761:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes180682408442fq0kia11119761:15840
Keomah silt loam, bedrock substratum, 1 to 3 percent slopes1181441408418fpzsia11119761:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes1801831408746fqbcia11519841:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes180943412015ftqtia18319831:15840
Keomah silt loam, benches, 1 to 3 percent slopes1180390411999ftq9ia18319831:15840
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B2027723785762tjnpil00119971:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A1104623785752tjnnil00119971:12000
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B87011729472tjnpil00919841:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A84651729462tjnnil00919841:12000
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 2 to 5 percent slopes9017B10426042042rbfzil00919841:12000
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes9017A2226042032rbfyil00919841:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A29857091502tjnnil01720031:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A48332617432tjnnil02119991:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A334314777112tjnnil03920051:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A199216156222tjnnil05719971:12000
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes9017A509615710nnpmil05719971:12000
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B1106156232tjnpil05719971:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A136592117272tjnnil06119681:15840
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B61352117282tjnpil06119681:15840
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded17B2103261751612tjnqil06719931:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A70931751592tjnnil06719931:15840
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B8681751602tjnpil06719931:15840
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 2 to 5 percent slopes9017B30626041132r79zil06719931:15840
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes9017A8926041122r79yil06719931:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A4432446222tjnnil07320011:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A9887281782tjnnil08320021:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A52236808582tjnnil09520021:12000
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes9017A119680932qvkkil09520021:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A493115956962tjnnil10720061:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A126386341182tjnnil10920021:12000
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B65776342152tjnpil10920021:12000
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 2 to 5 percent slopes9017B434634069p8svil10920021:12000
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes9017A298634068p8stil10920021:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A19391990522tjnnil11320001:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A249751992252tjnnil11719991:12000
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes9017A881992436pb6il11719991:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A27971820952tjnnil12319971:15840
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded17B23261820962tjnqil12319971:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A23226388372tjnnil12920051:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A10412449422tjnnil13120001:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A773816721182tjnnil13719841:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A222682090252tjnnil14319861:15840
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B18452009492tjnpil14920011:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A16132009482tjnnil14920011:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A93961992772tjnnil16719991:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A171152021732tjnnil16920001:12000
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes17B94732021742tjnpil16920001:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A399125420472tjnnil17119841:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A16221790672tjnnil17519921:15840
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes9017A25725423952r1zmil17519921:15840
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A240516011011qr2fil18320061:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A19242449052tjnnil18720021:12000
Keomah silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes9017A16224493586w4il18720021:12000
Keomah silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes17A62428691772tjnnil20320081:12000
Keomah silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded17B240138691782tjnqil20320081:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the KEOMAH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .