Soil Data Explorer - KAYMINE

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the KAYMINE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of KAYMINE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to KAYMINE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
127	88PA027089	1988PA027089	Kaymine	5	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	41.09,-77.8983333

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the KAYMINE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the KAYMINE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the KAYMINE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the KAYMINE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with KAYMINE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the KAYMINE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the KAYMINE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with KAYMINE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. KY-2010-09-03-12 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

   Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Handshoe-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

2. KY-2010-09-03-15 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

   Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Dekalb general soil map unit in Letcher County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

3. KY-2010-09-03-16 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

   Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Kimper general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

4. KY-2010-09-03-18 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topography in the Hazleton-Shelocta-Fiveblock and Grigsby-Shelocta-Orrville general soil map units. The Hazleton-Shelocta-Fiveblock general soil map unit is on the mountains and in the surface mined areas, and the Grigsby-Shelocta-Orrville general soil map unit is in the valleys (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

5. KY-2010-09-03-39 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

   Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Helechawa-Gilpin-Hazleton general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

6. KY-2010-09-03-41 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

   Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Kimper-Shelocta-Fedscreek-Gilpin general soil map unit in Magoffin County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

7. KY-2010-09-03-42 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

   Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Latham-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

8. VA-2010-11-05-07 | Buchanan County -

   Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia).

9. VA-2010-11-05-16 | Dickenson County - 2009

   Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

10. VA-2010-11-05-17 | Dickenson County - 2009

    Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

11. VA-2010-11-05-31 | Russell County - 2007

    Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

12. VA-2012-05-10-04 | Buchanan County - 2009

    An illustration of an area that has been surface-mined for coal that shows a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).

13. VA-2012-05-10-05 | Buchanan County - 2009

    An illustration of an area that has been surface-mined for coal that shows a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Buchanan County, Virginia; 2009).

14. VA-2012-05-11-02 | Dickenson County - 2009

    Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and multiple exposed highwalls. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

15. VA-2012-05-11-03 | Dickenson County - 2009

    Illustration of an area that has been surface mined for coal, showing a sequence of native residual and colluvial soils, mine soils, rock outcrop, and a single exposed highwall. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position and geologic strata (Soil Survey of Dickenson County, Virginia; 2009).

16. VA-2012-05-11-11 | Russell County - 2007

    Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

17. WV-2010-11-08-11 | Logan and Mingo Counties - 2008

    Typical relationship of the soils and the underlying parent material in the Matewan-Highsplint-Guyandotte general soil map unit. Surface coal mining is in scattered areas throughout the map unit. The terraced area on the right of the diagram illustrates a valley fill, which is a common method of disposal and reclamation of overburden from coal mining activities. The flat area on the upper left illustrates mountaintop removal (Soil Survey of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia; 2008).

18. WV-2010-11-08-12 | Logan and Mingo Counties - 2008

    Typical relationship of the soils and the underlying parent material in the Matewan-Pineville-Guyandotte general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Logan and Mingo Counties, West Virginia; 2008).

19. WV-2012-03-23-01 | Boone County - June 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Dekalb-Pineville-Guyandotte general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Boone County, WV; 1994).

20. WV-2012-03-23-03 | Boone County - June 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Dekalb general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Boone County, WV; 1994).

21. WV-2012-03-23-09 | Wyoming County - September 1988

    Typical relationship of the soils and the underlying parent material in the Dekalb-Pineville-Guyandotte general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Wyoming County, WV; 1988).

Map Units

Map units containing KAYMINE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Fairpoint and Kaymine soils, 30 to 80 percent slopes, stony	FsF	4283	1884674	2184y	ky063	2007	1:12000
Fairpoint and Kaymine soils, 6 to 30 percent slopes	FkD	1505	1884673	2184x	ky063	2007	1:12000
Fairpoint and Kaymine soils, 0 to 6 percent slopes	FkB	1314	1884672	2184w	ky063	2007	1:12000
Kaymine, Fairpoint, and Fiveblock soils, benched, 2 to 70 percent slopes, very stony	KfF	51793	550742	lh2w	ky626	1997	1:24000
Fiveblock and Kaymine soils, 0 to 30 percent slopes, stony	FkE	10364	550731	lh2j	ky626	1997	1:24000
Fiveblock, Fairpoint, and Kaymine soils, 30 to 80 percent slopes, stony	FiF	39182	550903	lh82	ky640	1996	1:24000
Fiveblock, Fairpoint, and Kaymine soils, 6 to 30 percent slopes, stony	FiD	12417	550902	lh81	ky640	1996	1:24000
Fiveblock, Fairpoint, and Kaymine soils, 0 to 6 percent slopes, stony	FiB	3697	550901	lh80	ky640	1996	1:24000
Kaymine, Bethesda, and Fiveblock soils, benched, 2 to 70 percent slopes, stony	KbF	16828	550940	lh98	ky641	1994	1:24000
Kaymine, Bethesda, and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 20 percent slopes, stony	KbD	3656	550939	lh97	ky641	1994	1:24000
Shelocta-Kaymine complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very bouldery	25F	20215	1670878	2x5jh	va027	2006	1:24000
Cedarcreek, Fiveblock, and Kaymine soils, 55 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	3F	12732	1670882	1t2pf	va027	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony	14E	8589	1670881	1t2pd	va027	2006	1:24000
Sewell-Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	21F	7082	1670904	1t2q4	va027	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Cedarcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	15C	1681	1670954	1t2rr	va027	2006	1:24000
Kaymine very channery silt loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony	13D	1448	1670880	1t2pc	va027	2006	1:24000
Shelocta-Kaymine complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very bouldery	25F	10023	2399887	2x5jh	va051	2008	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony	14E	5871	2399871	2lk86	va051	2008	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Cedarcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	16C	3415	2399873	2lk88	va051	2008	1:24000
Kaymine, Cedarcreek, and Fiveblock soils, 55 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	15F	3242	2399872	2lk87	va051	2008	1:24000
Kaymine-Sewell-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	17F	3049	2399874	2lk89	va051	2008	1:24000
Kaymine very channery silt loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony	13D	2962	2399870	2lk85	va051	2008	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony	32E	2197	1671899	1t3r7	va167	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Cedarcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	34C	2029	1671897	1t3r5	va167	2006	1:24000
Sewell-Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	47F	810	1671904	1t3rd	va167	2006	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	33F	808	1671900	1t3r8	va167	2006	1:24000
Kaymine very channery silt loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony	31D	805	1671243	1t322	va167	2006	1:24000
Shelocta-Kaymine complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very bouldery	50F	605	1671241	2x5jh	va167	2006	1:24000
Kaymine very channery silt loam, 8 to 45 percent slopes, very stony	26E	109	778065	v3mw	va169	2003	1:24000
Shelocta-Kaymine complex, 55 to 80 percent slopes, very bouldery	70G	34245	2508609	2x5jh	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 55 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	39G	16768	2508565	2q7qg	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes, extremely stony	41F	10116	2508567	2q7qh	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine very channery silt loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes, extremely stony	40E	8213	2508566	2q7qf	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Cedarcreek complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	42C	7295	2508568	2q7qj	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine-Fiveblock-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	43C	5415	2508569	2q7qk	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine-Sewell-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	44G	1957	2508570	2q7ql	va195	2010	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KmF	19705	514863	2tqhh	wv005	1988	1:24000
Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony	KrF	3485	514864	k8rj	wv005	1988	1:24000
Kaymine very channery loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very stony	KeB	1065	514862	k8rg	wv005	1988	1:24000
Kaymine-rock outcrop complex, very steep	KxF	6828	553106	lkk4	wv025	2002	1:24000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 0 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	ClF	12497	3086622	2w1ww	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed	CmF	3499	3054876	2xb1d	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	CnD	3461	3054880	2xpgx	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 25 to 75 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	CnF	2111	3054881	2xb1h	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, unreclaimed, highwall	CnB	510	3086623	2w1wx	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed, highwall	CyD	283	3054885	2xph5	wv039	1976	1:20000
Cedarcreek-Kaymine very channery loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stony, reclaimed, highwall	CyB	169	3054884	2xph4	wv039	1976	1:20000
Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KfF	1921	553374	lkts	wv043	2005	1:24000
Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	KfB	606	553375	lktt	wv043	2005	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KmF	134	553373	2tqhh	wv043	2005	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KcF	15960	532217	2tqhh	wv047	1993	1:24000
Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony	KrF	3645	532220	kvtd	wv047	1993	1:24000
Kaymine very channery loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	KaB	590	532216	kvt8	wv047	1993	1:24000
Kaymine very channery silt loam, very steep, extremely stony	KaF	5415	515130	k913	wv101	1992	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KcF	7760	513500	2tqhh	wv109	1984	1:24000
Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, very steep	KmF	1060	513501	k7bk	wv109	1984	1:24000
Fiveblock and Kaymine soils, 35 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony	FkF	17385	1155540	17sfh	wv620	2005	1:24000
Fiveblock and Kaymine soils, 0 to 15 percent slopes, extremely stony	FkC	4235	1155539	17sfg	wv620	2005	1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Matewan complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KcF	290	1155550	2tqhh	wv620	2005	1:24000
Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 35 to 65 percent slopes, extremely stony	KfF	75	1155549	17sfs	wv620	2005	1:24000
Kaymine and Fiveblock soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	KfB	20	1155548	17sfr	wv620	2005	1:24000
Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony	KrF	20	1155551	17sfv	wv620	2005	1:24000
Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, very stony	KrF	1833	2427126	2mgmd	wv622	2010	1:12000
Kaymine very channery loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	KmC	106	2427125	2mgmc	wv622	2010	1:12000
Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, very stony	KrF	28721	2454323	2ncxq	wv705	2009	1:24000
Kaymine very channery loam, very steep, very stony	KmF	14335	2453281	2nbv3	wv705	2009	1:24000
Kaymine very channery loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	KmC	3627	2453251	2nbt4	wv705	2009	1:24000
Kaymine-Rock outcrop complex, very steep, extremely stony	KrF	8361	2516663	261cp	wv713		1:24000
Kaymine-Cedarcreek-Dekalb complex, very steep	KcF	4	2516654	261cb	wv713		1:24000
Kaymine channery loam, very steep, extremely stony	KaF	6266	2514098	k7lv	wv767	2011	1:20000
Kaymine channery loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stony	KaB	435	2514097	k7lt	wv767	2011	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the KAYMINE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).