Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the JONESBORO soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of JONESBORO, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to JONESBORO were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
114ACT-0821999-OH027-082Jonesboro4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3677788,-83.9944458

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the JONESBORO soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the JONESBORO series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the JONESBORO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the JONESBORO series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with JONESBORO share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the JONESBORO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the JONESBORO series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with JONESBORO, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OH-2010-09-29-09 | Clinton County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Westboro-Clermont-Jonesboro general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Clinton County, Ohio; 2005).

Map Units

Map units containing JONESBORO as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoR1B1184861701152lnvpoh00119871:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoR1B16423124033272lnvpoh01519871:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedJoR1B229824033262lnvnoh01519871:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedJrC21415857591q73joh01519871:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesJoR1A1624033282lnvqoh01519871:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne-Urban land complex, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoRU1B430338110030tq6oh01719771:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoR1B1681697912lnvpoh01719771:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedJoR1B2327651202lnvnoh01719771:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoR1B13249327650992lnvpoh02519721:20000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedJoR1B2182871688152lnvnoh02519721:20000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesJoR1A157901688132lnvqoh02519721:20000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoR1B160161719752lnvpoh02719991:12000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedJrC233291719765rymoh02719991:12000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesJoR1A19871719742lnvqoh02719991:12000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedJoR1B233801694352lnvnoh06119801:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesJoR1A16701694342lnvqoh06119801:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoR1B12017208282lnvpoh06119801:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoR1B12821727651092lnvpoh07119731:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedJoR1B2608514205142lnvnoh07119731:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesJoR1A159627651082lnvqoh07119731:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedJrC22214205721jp6xoh07119731:15840
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopesJoR1B11533327651112lnvpoh16519671:20000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, erodedJoR1B21087727651122lnvnoh16519671:20000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopesJoR1A1363527651102lnvqoh16519671:20000
Jonesboro-Rossmoyne silt loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, erodedJrC25417009371v2yyoh16519671:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the JONESBORO soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .