Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the JEFFREY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of JEFFREY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to JEFFREY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the JEFFREY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the JEFFREY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the JEFFREY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the JEFFREY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with JEFFREY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the JEFFREY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the JEFFREY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with JEFFREY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing JEFFREY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Crossnore-Jeffrey complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very stonyCrE8550548055ld96nc01119971:12000
Crossnore-Jeffrey complex, 50 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyCrF1049548056ld97nc01119971:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, stonyChF7916719801t3tvnc02120061:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stonyChE3916719791t3ttnc02120061:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stonyChD2016719781t3tsnc02120061:12000
Crossnore-Jeffrey complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very stonyCyE9851167993xjqnc02320001:24000
Crossnore-Jeffrey complex, 50 to 80 percent slopes, very stonyCyF711168003xjrnc02320001:24000
Crossnore-Jeffrey complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very stonyCrE4126792122r928nc02720121:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very rockyCrF353024231082mbfsnc03920091:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, rockyCfE75224231072mbfrnc03920091:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very rockyCsF132481912742226ccnc07520071:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, rockyCrE58811912741226cbnc07520071:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, rockyCrD15891912739226c8nc07520071:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, stonyChF111416713321t34ync11520061:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stonyChE71216713311t34xnc11520061:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stonyChD27716713301t34wnc11520061:12000
Jeffrey cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very stonyJfD143561913lvq7nc18920011:12000
Jeffrey cobbly loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very stonyJfE40561914lvq8nc18920011:12000
Cheoah-Jeffrey complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes, very rockyCkF2471556259lntvnc60520071:12000
Jeffrey loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesJeE36526459kntktn01920001:24000
Jeffrey loam, 35 to 50 percent slopesJeF4526460kntltn01920001:24000
Jeffrey cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very stonyJeD370526539knx4tn09120001:24000
Jeffrey cobbly loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very stonyJeE53526540knx5tn09120001:24000
Jeffrey cobbly loam, 25 to 60 percent slopesJyF4483527906kqb7tn12319741:20000
Jeffrey cobbly loam, 12 to 25 percent slopesJyD1049527905kqb6tn12319741:20000
Jeffrey channery loam, 35 to 65 percent slopesJeF4649523758kl0ftn13919971:24000
Jeffrey channery loam, 12 to 35 percent slopesJeD1131523757kl0dtn13919971:24000
Jeffrey loam, 35 to 50 percent slopesJeF71530071ksl2tn16319911:20000
Jeffrey loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesJeE69530070ksl1tn16319911:20000
Jeffrey loam, 35 to 60 percent slopesJeF2463528414kqvmtn17119801:24000
Jeffrey loam, 20 to 35 percent slopesJeE381528413kqvltn17119801:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the JEFFREY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .