Soil Data Explorer - JACKLAND

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the JACKLAND soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of JACKLAND, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to JACKLAND were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the JACKLAND soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the JACKLAND series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the JACKLAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the JACKLAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with JACKLAND share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the JACKLAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the JACKLAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with JACKLAND, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. MD-2010-09-03-02 | City of Baltimore - 1998

   Pattern of soils in the Urban land-Legore association (Soil Survey of City of Baltimore, Maryland; 1998).

2. MD-2012-02-03-03 | City of Baltimore - 1998

   Pattern of soils in the Urban land-Legore association (Soil Survey of City of Baltimore, Maryland; 1998).

3. VA-2010-11-05-10 | Culpeper County -

   Relationship of soils and landscape in the Culpeper Triassic Basin Diabase and Hornfel (Soil Survey of Culpeper County, Virginia).

4. VA-2010-11-05-19 | Fauquier County -

   Relationship of soils and landscape in the Culpeper Triassic Basin Diabase and Hornfel (Soil Survey of Fauquier County, Virginia).

Map Units

Map units containing JACKLAND as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Jackland-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	JuB	479	2404862	2lqg6	md005	2010	1:12000
Jackland silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	JaB	293	2404861	2lqg5	md005	2010	1:12000
Jackland silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	JaB	211	793008	vm5x	md027	2004	1:12000
Jackland silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	29B	1085	533619	kx8j	md031	1989	1:15840
Jackland-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	12UB	1813	533891	kxk9	md510	1993	1:12000
Jackland silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	12B	213	533890	kxk8	md510	1993	1:12000
Jackland silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	12A	14	533889	kxk7	md510	1993	1:12000
Jackland-Orange complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	JkB	685	2973920	2wx29	nc033	2016	1:24000
Jackland loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes	JkB	649	2424544	2mcy3	nc059	1988	1:24000
Jackland fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	JkB	325	2433525	2mp8t	nc067	1970	1:15840
Jackland fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes	JkB	9	2433172	2mnxf	nc081	1975	1:20000
Jackland fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes	JkB	1109	2389049	2l603	nc157	1983	1:24000
Jackland fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes	JkD	658	2389050	2l604	nc157	1983	1:24000
Jackland loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	JaB	1128	2398187	2lhhw	nc197	1960	1:15840
Jackland loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes	JaC	661	2398197	2lhj6	nc197	1960	1:15840
Jackland loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded	JaC2	478	2398198	2lhj7	nc197	1960	1:15840
Jackland loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded	JaB2	220	2398188	2lhhx	nc197	1960	1:15840
Jackland fine sandy loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes	19B	2387	135942	2xx68	va019	1985	1:24000
Jackland fine sandy loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes	19C	1877	135943	2xx69	va019	1985	1:24000
Jackland-Mirerock complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes	22B	11590	2479415	2p714	va029	2010	1:24000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 2 to 7 percent slopes	38B	8539	1726396	1vyg6	va047	2006	1:24000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 2 to 7 percent slopes, very bouldery	39B	4317	1726398	1vyg8	va047	2006	1:24000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes	38A	2150	1726395	1vyg5	va047	2006	1:24000
Haymarket-Jackland complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes, bouldery	35C	527	1726390	1vyg0	va047	2006	1:24000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, very bouldery	39A	284	1726397	1vyg7	va047	2006	1:24000
Jackland-Mirerock complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes	22B	209	1587421	1q8v4	va049	2005	1:24000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 7 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	64C	1687	2250439	2fjrt	va059	2007	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 2 to 7 percent slopes	63B	1052	2250432	2fjrl	va059	2007	1:12000
Hattontown-Jackland-Haymarket complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes	54B	1051	2250401	2fjql	va059	2007	1:12000
Hattontown-Jackland-Haymarket complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes	54C	781	2250403	2fjqn	va059	2007	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 2 to 7 percent slopes, very stony	64B	329	2250437	2fjrr	va059	2007	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 7 to 15 percent slopes	63C	109	2250433	2fjrm	va059	2007	1:12000
Jackland silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	62A	66	2250429	2fjrh	va059	2007	1:12000
Hattontown-Jackland complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	53A	28	2250397	2fjqg	va059	2007	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stony	64D	4	2250441	2fjrw	va059	2007	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 2 to 7 percent slopes	67B	5960	1895368	21m8x	va061	2006	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 7 to 15 percent slopes	67C	952	1895369	21m8y	va061	2006	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 2 to 7 percent slopes, very stony	68B	859	1895370	21m8z	va061	2006	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 7 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	68C	767	1895371	21m90	va061	2006	1:12000
Jackland-Mirerock-Redbrush complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes	24C	2027	581999	mjm5	va067	2004	1:24000
Jackland-Mirerock-Redbrush complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	24B	429	581998	mjm4	va067	2004	1:24000
Jackland-Orange complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	26B	3134	1472823	1lflf	va083	2004	1:24000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 2 to 7 percent slopes	67B	6039	642094	pk4q	va107	2006	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 2 to 7 percent slopes, very stony	68B	2478	642098	pk4v	va107	2006	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 7 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	68C	969	642099	pk4w	va107	2006	1:12000
Jackland and Haymarket soils, 7 to 15 percent slopes	67C	668	642096	pk4s	va107	2006	1:12000
Jackland gravelly silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes	27B	1455	136981	4ljr	va125	1992	1:24000
Jackland gravelly silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes	27C	707	136984	4ljv	va125	1992	1:24000
Orange-Jackland silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	OrA	966	119897	2zhg1	va137	1966	1:15840
Orange-Jackland silt loams, 2 to 7 percent slopes	OrB	365	119898	2zhg2	va137	1966	1:15840
Orange-Jackland silt loams, 2 to 7 percent slopes, moderately eroded	OrB2	194	119899	2zhg3	va137	1966	1:15840
Jackland silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes	30B	3435	521178	khb6	va153	1985	1:15840
Jackland-Haymarket complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes	31B	1850	521179	khb7	va153	1985	1:15840
Jackland-Haymarket complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes	31C	1327	521180	khb8	va153	1985	1:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the JACKLAND soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).