Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ITCA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ITCA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ITCA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
28A86P096286UT021002Itca7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties37.9011116,-114.0286102
28B82P032481NV015308Itca7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.5171471,-116.7895279

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ITCA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ITCA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ITCA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ITCA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ITCA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ITCA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ITCA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ITCA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NV-2012-05-09-09 | Lander County, North Part - May 1992

    Typical relationship of general soil map units and landscapes: Playas (1); Buffaran-Allor-Chlara (11); Puett-Wieland-Genaw (14); and Itca-Reluctan-Punchbowl (20) (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, North Part; May 1992).

  2. NV-2012-05-09-13 | Lander County, South Part - November 1991

    General soil map units representative of those on a bolson that is an internally drained intermontane basin (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, South Part; November 1991).

  3. NV-2012-05-09-14 | Lander County, South Part - November 1991

    General soil map units representative of those on a semibolson that is an externally drained intermontane basin (Soil Survey of Lander County, Nevada, South Part; November 1991).

Map Units

Map units containing ITCA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Vitale-Itca-Rubble land complex, 2 to 60 percent slopes19220342486088j9t8id67519921:24000
Vitale-Mulshoe-Itca complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes19311567486089j9t9id67519921:24000
Itca-Kanlee complex3110845823642rpxid70719761:24000
Itca-Birchcreek-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 55 percent slopes844867194914823f7rid70819871:24000
Birchcreek-Itca complex, 25 to 55 percent slopes211709194914423f7mid70819871:24000
Itca-Birchcreek-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 55 percent slopes84190824100092lwt7id72120091:24000
Birchcreek-Itca complex, 25 to 55 percent slopes2196224100042lwt2id72120091:24000
Itca-Roca-Reluctan association313621745479195j2mxnv76819851:63360
Itca-Clanalpine-Torro association313418670479193j2mvnv76819851:63360
Reluctan-Locane-Itca association345315785479228j2nznv76819851:63360
Jung-Itca-Roca association3841142604792452whlwnv76819851:63360
Itca-Clanalpine-Reluctan association31309435479190j2mrnv76819851:63360
Torro-Itca-Softscrabble association34647420479234j2p5nv76819851:63360
Itca-Reluctan-Walti association31376625479196j2mynv76819851:63360
Punchbowl-Itca association20975725479106j2k1nv76819851:63360
Walti-Softscrabble-Itca association31235325479188j2mpnv76819851:63360
Duco-Itca-Roca association38614930479254j2ptnv76819851:63360
Itca-Clanalpine-Rock outcrop association31354295479194j2mwnv76819851:63360
Robson-Itca-Softscrabble association31553530479201j2n3nv76819851:63360
Ninemile-Zoesta-Itca association31113515479184j2mknv76819851:63360
Itca-Ninemile-Rock outcrop association31313380479191j2msnv76819851:63360
Itca-Softscrabble-Cleavage association31322675479192j2mtnv76819851:63360
Itca variant-Reluctan-Handy association26902390479145j2l9nv76819851:63360
Ravenswood-Itca-Walti association8111790479305j2rgnv76819851:63360
Torro-Clanalpine-Itca association34631605479233j2p4nv76819851:63360
Itca-Reluctan-Walti association38169909476567hzx4nv77019951:24000
Ravenswood-Itca-Walti association44012489476589hzxvnv77019951:24000
Douhide-Itca-Ravenswood association54010151476618hzysnv77019951:24000
Duco-Itca-Puett association3736393476565hzx2nv77019951:24000
Itca-Clanalpine-Rock outcrop association3805542476566hzx3nv77019951:24000
Clanalpine-Itca-Old Camp association7001866476651hzzvnv77019951:24000
Borealis-Itca association178331305476809j04ynv77419851:24000
Itca-Teguro-Rock outcrop association80504702477022j0ctnv77419851:24000
Ravenswood-Brier-Itca association80301366477020j0crnv77419851:24000
Jung-Itca-Roca association384157304796552whlwnv77519851:24000
Itca-Clanalpine-Sumine association31345425479618j32knv77519851:24000
Ninemile-Zoesta-Itca association31114300479612j32cnv77519851:24000
Sumine-Itca-Softscrabble association14272435479468j2xqnv77519851:24000
Reluctan-Locane-Itca association3453615479634j332nv77519851:24000
Itca very cobbly loam, 30 to 70 percent north slopes116G2576488906jdr5or63619911:24000
Lorella-Itca complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes146G2050488958jdsvor63619911:24000
Itca-Bullump complex, 30 to 50 percent north slopes117F1376488907jdr6or63619911:24000
Pernog-Itca association, 5 to 30 percent slopes200E1306489040jdwhor63619911:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ITCA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .