Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the INGALLS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of INGALLS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to INGALLS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the INGALLS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the INGALLS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the INGALLS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the INGALLS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with INGALLS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the INGALLS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the INGALLS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with INGALLS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. MI-2010-09-07-07 | Kalkaska County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Islandlake-Blue Lake-Morganlake, sandy substratum, general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Kalkaska County, Michigan; 2005).

  2. MI-2010-09-10-07 | Keweenaw County Area - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Garlic-Waiska-Alcona association (Soil Survey of Keweenaw County Area, Michigan; 2006).

  3. MI-2010-09-10-08 | Keweenaw County Area - 2006

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lupton-Tawas-Deford association (Soil Survey of Keweenaw County Area, Michigan; 2006).

Map Units

Map units containing INGALLS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Ingalls sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes21A82314552551kv9qmi00320071:24000
Ingalls loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesIgA11791891726bvbmi01119641:20000
Ingalls loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopesIgB1791891736bvcmi01119641:20000
Ingalls loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes47A45641905926db4mi03119881:15840
Gaastra-Gogomain-Ingalls complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes145A9191415101fxycmi03319891:15840
Ingalls loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes52A5215415160fy08mi03319891:15840
Ingalls-Halfaday complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes86A816415176fy0smi03319891:15840
Iosco-Brevort-Ingalls associationII69241897946chdmi05119661:15840
Rubicon-Ocqueoc-Ingalls association, undulatingRWB39291898566ckdmi05119661:15840
Iosco-Au Gres-Ingalls associationIA34351897906ch8mi05119661:15840
Grattan-Ocqueoc-Ingalls association, undulatingGQB309726734982qz64mi05119661:15840
Iosco-Pipestone-Ingalls associationIP190426734932qz5zmi05119661:15840
Ingalls sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesIcA9361897926chbmi05119661:15840
Ingalls-Alpena gravelly loamy sands, 0 to 2 percent slopesIaA2201894546c4fmi05519631:15840
Ingalls-Alpena gravelly loamy sands, 2 to 6 percent slopesIaB1121894556c4gmi05519631:15840
Ingalls-Deford complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes8156A84624847952pdmpmi06119891:20000
Wainola-Ingalls-Liminga complex, terrace, 1 to 55 percent slopes8152F19624847932pdmmmi06119891:20000
Ingalls sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes114A10361916996fgvmi06919951:15840
Ingalls-Burleigh loamy sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes412A7021906536dd3mi07919981:12000
Caffey-Ingalls-Iosco complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes168B5413416342fz7dmi09719941:20000
Ingalls fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes52A1111416410fz9lmi09719941:20000
Ingalls-Paquin complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes86B320416429fzb6mi09719941:20000
Ingalls fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes28A2712415467fyb5mi10919851:20000
Solona-Ingalls complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes64A1688415498fyc5mi10919851:20000
Bowers-Ingalls complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes63B662415497fyc4mi10919851:20000
Ingalls sand, 0 to 2 percent slopesIcA1226735466chbmi11119761:15840
Ingalls sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes37A15861899136cm7mi12919871:15840
Ingalls loamy fine sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes36A324714564161kwj5mi13120071:24000
Ingalls-Deford complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes8156A13116748451t6t8mi13120071:24000
Wainola-Ingalls-Liminga complex, terrace, 1 to 55 percent slopes8152F1216748421t6t5mi13120071:24000
Ingalls sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes35A36411908846dmkmi14119891:15840
Ingalls sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes114A3741910386dsjmi14319991:12000
Ingalls-Caffey complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes61A138914570261kx4vmi15320071:24000
Ingalls loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes564A9315380771nmhdmi15320071:24000
Ingalls sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes401A6116706281t2f7mi15320071:24000
Borgstrom-Ingalls complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes136B2123817770wfypmi60520041:24000
Ingalls loamy sandIg1852421053g44cwi06719831:20000
Ingalls loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopesIgA142395797f8vnwi07819981:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the INGALLS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .