Soil Data Explorer - HUTCHLEY

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HUTCHLEY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HUTCHLEY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HUTCHLEY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HUTCHLEY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HUTCHLEY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUTCHLEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUTCHLEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HUTCHLEY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUTCHLEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUTCHLEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HUTCHLEY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HUTCHLEY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Sumine-Softscrabble-Hutchley association, 15 to 50 percent slopes	370	3757	487724	jcj1	ca608	2000	1:24000
Hutchley-Ninemile-Nutzan association	440	11398	1034709	13qpq	ca685	2006	1:24000
Nutzan-Hutchley-Tusune association	491	10282	1034706	13qpm	ca685	2006	1:24000
Cavin-Ashtre-Hutchley association	335	6155	1034667	13qnc	ca685	2006	1:24000
Zorromount-Hutchley association	602	4779	1034673	13qnk	ca685	2006	1:24000
Hutchley-Cavin-Brownsbowl association	437	4244	1034704	13qpk	ca685	2006	1:24000
Hutchley-Ashtre association	436	4138	1034687	13qp0	ca685	2006	1:24000
Hutchley-Mosquet-Brownsbowl association	439	3075	1034711	13qps	ca685	2006	1:24000
Hutchley-Cavin-Zorromount association	438	2767	1034678	13qnq	ca685	2006	1:24000
Softscrabble-Sumine-Hutchley association	569	2607	1034730	13qqd	ca685	2006	1:24000
Cavin-Hutchley association	337	2079	1034666	13qnb	ca685	2006	1:24000
Hutchley-Softscrabble association	441	1927	1034680	13qns	ca685	2006	1:24000
Ninemile-Hutchley-Crocan association	475	1451	1398250	1hxzv	ca685	2006	1:24000
Softscrabble-Dosie-Hutchley association	567	182	1034732	13qqg	ca685	2006	1:24000
Howcan-Hagenbarth-Hutchley complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes	93-CL	50056	3173605	2smp	id703		1:24000
Nurkey-Zeebar-Hutchley, stony surface, complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes	143-CL	6958	3173612	2sd9	id703		1:24000
Howcan-Zeebar-Hutchley association, 15 to 60 percent slopes	39-B	2557	3173622	2n6m	id703		1:24000
Hutchley very gravelly silt loam, 10 to 35 percent slopes	75	4908	82550	2rwx	id708	1987	1:24000
Hutchley gravelly loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes	74	3811	82549	2rww	id708	1987	1:24000
Hutchley-Vipont complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes	76	3770	82551	2rwy	id708	1987	1:24000
Hutchley-Vipont complex, 35 to 55 percent slopes	77	3525	82552	2rwz	id708	1987	1:24000
Hutchley-Cupine-Vitale complex, 2 to 60 percent slopes	105	5120	3163502	2sltt	id712	2008	1:24000
Hutchley-Cupine-Vitale complex, 2 to 60 percent slopes	105-BL	1472	2917039	2sltt	id713		1:24000
Hutchley-Araveton-McCarey complex, 4 to 40 percent slopes	44	9	2619906	2v06x	id713		1:24000
Hutchley-Cupine-Vitale complex, 2 to 60 percent slopes	105-BL	89	3173325	2sltt	id714	1997	1:24000
Hutchley-Araveton-McCarey complex, 4 to 40 percent slopes	44	14137	3163593	2v06x	id715	1994	1:24000
Howcan-Hagenbarth-Hutchley complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes	93	23562	83256	2smp	id752	1999	1:24000
Nurkey-Zeebar-Hutchley, stony surface, complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes	143	6956	83027	2sd9	id752	1999	1:24000
Hutchley-Nurkey complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes	94	4014	83257	2smq	id752	1999	1:24000
Howcan-Zeebar-Hutchley association, 15 to 60 percent slopes	39	19495	79007	2n6m	id763	1998	1:24000
Howcan-Hutchley-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes	38	1856	79006	2n6l	id763	1998	1:24000
Howcan-Zeebar-Hutchley association, 15 to 60 percent slopes	20	50	1487053	1lxdg	id780	1998	1:24000
Hutchley-McIvey-Segura association	225	3298	2634012	2rhj4	nv621	1971	1:24000
Segura-McIvey-Hutchley association	500	1331	2634003	2rhhv	nv621	1971	1:24000
Hutchley-McIvey-Suak association	220	1150	2634008	2rhj0	nv621	1971	1:24000
Hutchley-Tusel-Suak association	226	259	2634004	2rhhw	nv621	1971	1:24000
Softscrabble-Hutchley-Burnborough association	1402	4425	474438	hxpg	nv628	1980	1:24000
Thulepah-Hutchley association	1261	3665	474437	hxpf	nv628	1980	1:24000
Softscrabble-Sumine-Hutchley association	1403	1224	474439	hxph	nv628	1980	1:24000
Segura-Bullump-Hutchley association	1030	3895	478572	j1zt	nv766	1994	1:24000
Hutchley-Simon association	192	2050	478255	j1nl	nv766	1994	1:24000
Softscrabble-Hutchley-Thulepah association	723	6214	477546	j0xq	nv771	1990	1:24000
Poodle-Hutchley-Tosp association	1470	4300	477376	j0r7	nv771	1990	1:24000
Softscrabble-Dosie-Hutchley association	729	3393	477551	j0xw	nv771	1990	1:24000
Cavin-Ashtre-Hutchley association	1633	3326	1704325	1v6h7	nv771	1990	1:24000
Softscrabble-Sumine-Hutchley association	721	3088	477544	j0xn	nv771	1990	1:24000
Thulepah-Hutchley-Rock outcrop association	711	2856	477543	j0xm	nv771	1990	1:24000
Hutchley-Terca association	1290	2485	477336	j0py	nv771	1990	1:24000
Hutchley-Cavin-Zorromount association	1634	1547	1704329	1v6hc	nv771	1990	1:24000
Thulepah-Hutchley association	710	1299	477542	j0xl	nv771	1990	1:24000
Softscrabble-Hutchley-Burnborough association	728	366	477550	j0xv	nv771	1990	1:24000
Cavin-Hutchley association	1635	32	1704326	1v6h8	nv771	1990	1:24000
Zorromount-Hutchley association	1636	2	1704332	1v6hg	nv771	1990	1:24000
Hutchley-Suak-Tusel association	6226	4198	2215777	2dcpp	nv778	2013	1:24000
Hutchley-McIvey association	4515	3060	2513228	2qbm0	nv778	2013	1:24000
Garfan-McIvey-Hutchley association	1230	1275	2215619	2dcjl	nv778	2013	1:24000
McIvey-Birchcreek-Hutchley association	567	13395	480529	j40y	nv780	1990	1:24000
Segura-McIvey-Hutchley association	500	11154	480508	j408	nv780	1990	1:24000
Hutchley-McIvey-Segura association	224	9582	480352	j3v7	nv780	1990	1:24000
Hutchley-Tusel-Suak association	226	7050	480354	j3v9	nv780	1990	1:24000
Hutchley-McIvey-Suak association	220	4810	480348	j3v3	nv780	1990	1:24000
Hutchley-McIvey-Pookaloo association	223	3100	480351	j3v6	nv780	1990	1:24000
Garfan-McIvey-Hutchley association	1230	278	480203	j3pf	nv780	1990	1:24000
Hutchley-Bocker-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 90 percent south slopes	4322DO	227	3385404	1nv9l	or626	2018	1:24000
Hutchley-Bocker-Skullhollow complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes	4322AO	135	3385403	1nv9k	or626	2018	1:24000
Hutchley-Kishwalk-Finsel complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes	4324NO	76	3385407	znj5	or626	2018	1:24000
Hogranch-Hutchley-Skullhollow complex, 20 to 50 percent north slopes	4322NO	63	3385405	1nv9j	or626	2018	1:24000
Hutchley-Bocker-Kahler complex, 20 to 50 percent south slopes	4323NO	37	3385406	znj4	or626	2018	1:24000
Hogranch-Hutchley-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent north slopes	4321DO	13	3385402	nfqd	or626	2018	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HUTCHLEY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).