Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HUSKA soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HUSKA, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HUSKA were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
80A93P039792OK109004Huska5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.7069435,-97.4816666
80A93P0396S1995OK109017Huska6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.7059904,-97.4897832

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HUSKA soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HUSKA series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUSKA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUSKA series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HUSKA share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUSKA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUSKA series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HUSKA, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OK-2012-02-16-12 | Cleveland County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Grainola-Grant map unit and the Port-Weswood map unit (Soil Survey of Cleveland County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

  2. OK-2012-02-17-27 | Payne County - April 1987

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Coyle-Grainola map unit (Soil Survey of Payne County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

Map Units

Map units containing HUSKA as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Kingfisher-Huska complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesKlB1740381733dt6zok01119651:24000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesGwC26623818922tq5qok01519671:24000
Renfrow-Huska complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded6510981382128dtmqok02719841:24000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes8457393821492tq5qok02719841:24000
Renfrow-Huska complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes664841382129dtmrok02719841:24000
Renfrow-Urban land-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes692007382132dtmvok02719841:24000
Grant-Urban land-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes88317382152dtnhok02719841:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesZsB439423822182tq65ok03119651:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesZsB285353822632tq65ok03319611:24000
Oil-waste land-Huska complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesOa14323822902tq6hok03719521:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaHC1025163592tq6vok03719521:24000
Renfrow-Huska complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes471974382668dv64ok05119751:24000
Oil-waste land-Huska complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesOd21103833552tq6hok07119651:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 3 to 5 percent slopesZaHC5484383692dw85ok08319941:12000
Oil-waste land-Huska complex, 1 to 8 percent slopesOWHD1253836612tq6hok08319941:12000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesGrHC293836212tq5qok08319941:12000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesGrHC105153840572tq5qok10319941:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaHC68063841272tq6vok10319941:24000
Piedmont-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesPdHC1214384342dwy4ok10919961:12000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesGrHC2143842962tq5qok10919961:12000
Oil-waste land-Huska complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes4417526234392tq6hok11319751:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaHC587514231932tq6vok11720071:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes, erodedZaHC292018837992177qok11720071:24000
Zaneis-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesZaHC1045819076492tq6vok11919831:24000
Huska silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes814389384583dx5xok11919831:24000
Oil-waste land-Huska complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes991923845972tq6hok11919831:24000
Chickasha-Huska complex, 1 to 3 percent slopesCk481013848552yhdwok13719601:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HUSKA soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .