Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HUMMINGTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HUMMINGTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HUMMINGTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
375C0076S1975OR039011Hummington6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.2481461,-122.6411667

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HUMMINGTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HUMMINGTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUMMINGTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUMMINGTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HUMMINGTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUMMINGTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUMMINGTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HUMMINGTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HUMMINGTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hummington gravelly loam, 50 to 75 percent slopes60G735162710237xor63719811:20000
Hummington gravelly loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes60F157462709237wor63719811:20000
Hummington gravelly loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes60D86462708237vor63719811:20000
Soapgrass, cool, moist-Hummington, high precipitation complex, 30 to 90 percent slopes3159239343947630k87or63719811:20000
Hummington very gravelly loam, 50 to 75 percent slopes50G75656432724y2or63919831:20000
Hummington very gravelly loam, 25 to 50 percent slopes50F43006432624y1or63919831:20000
Hummington very gravelly loam, 5 to 25 percent slopes50D13156432524y0or63919831:20000
Soapgrass, cool, moist-Hummington, high precipitation complex, 30 to 90 percent slopes31592160343950530k87or63919831:20000
Oneonta-Hummington complex, 30 to 60 percent north slopes176F60466485275por64919941:24000
Oneonta-Hummington complex, 30 to 60 percent south slopes177F45566486275qor64919941:24000
Hummington very gravelly loam, 60 to 90 percent north slopes103G4516622626xbor64919941:24000
Soapgrass, cool, moist-Hummington, high precipitation complex, 30 to 90 percent slopes3159211061338561230k87or6571:24000
Tumblebug-Hummington complex, 30 to 90 percent slopes, cold37542714733855742z9rbor6571:24000
Soapgrass, low precipitation-Hummington complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes41192706433855642z9qzor6571:24000
Soapgrass, moist-Hummington complex, 30 to 90 percent slopes39592470533855842z9rror6571:24000
Soapgrass, low precipitation-Hummington-Rock outcrop complex, 60 to 90 percent slopes41194221933855652z9r0or6571:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HUMMINGTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .