Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HUMBARGER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HUMBARGER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HUMBARGER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HUMBARGER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HUMBARGER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUMBARGER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUMBARGER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HUMBARGER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HUMBARGER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HUMBARGER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HUMBARGER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-23-01 | Finney County - November 1965

    Typical cross section of the Pawnee River drainage basin (Soil Survey of Finney County, Kansas; 1965).

  2. KS-2012-01-23-10 | Graham County - October 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Holdrege-Uly-Penden association (Soil Survey of Graham County, Kansas; 1986).

  3. KS-2012-01-23-11 | Graham County - October 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the association (Soil Survey of Graham County, Kansas; 1986).

  4. KS-2012-01-23-13 | Grant County - December 1969

    Relationships of soils in association 2 (Soil Survey of Grant County, Kansas; 1969).

  5. KS-2012-01-23-14 | Grant County - December 1969

    Relationships of soils in association 3 (Soil Survey of Grant County, Kansas; 1969).

  6. KS-2012-01-25-23 | Republic County - November 1967

    Distribution of the soils in the Muir-Carr-Humbarger association (Soil Survey of Republic County, Kansas; 1967).

  7. KS-2012-01-26-16 | Trego County - February 1990

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Armo-Heizer-Brownell association (Soil Survey of Trego County, Kansas; 1990).

  8. KS-2012-01-26-17 | Trego County - February 1990

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Penden-Armo association (Soil Survey of Trego County, Kansas; 1990).

  9. KS-2012-01-26-30 | Wichita County - November 1965

    Cross section of association 2 along White Woman Creek (Soil Survey of Wichita County, Kansas; 1965).

  10. KS-2012-01-26-31 | Wichita County - November 1965

    Relationship of soils to the landscape and to the common parent materials of Wichita County (Soil Survey of Wichita County, Kansas; 1965).

  11. TX-2012-03-20-34 | Dallam County - March 1975

    Relationship of soils and underlying material in the Plack-Berthoud association (Soil Survey of Dallam County, TX; 1975).

Map Units

Map units containing HUMBARGER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Humbarger loam, channeled376581211501442twlfks05119701:24000
Dale and Humbarger clay loams, rarely flooded23251755913804193165pks05719621:24000
Pratt-Humbarger complex, 0 to 15 percent slopes593719731380460307pqks05719621:24000
Humbarger loam, channeled376527511506732twlfks06319741:24000
Humbarger loam, occasionally flooded35931211506742wsd2ks06319741:24000
Humbarger loam, channeled37652244311508012twlfks06519851:24000
Humbarger loam, occasionally flooded35931340211508022wsd2ks06519851:24000
Humbarger loam, occasionally flooded3593196513806612wsddks06719651:24000
Penden-Humbarger complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes27623987711524242twdqks08319661:24000
Humbarger loam, frequently flooded3585114513312yl4hks12319771:24000
Penden-Humbarger complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes27626611520912twdqks13519711:24000
Humbarger loam, occasionally flooded359321411507642wsd2ks13719731:24000
Humbarger loam, frequently flooded3585159611510172yl4hks14119711:24000
Penden-Humbarger complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes27621913801382twdqks14519761:24000
Humbarger loam, occasionally flooded359342611502512wsd2ks16319801:24000
Humbarger loam, channeled37654511502502twlfks16319801:24000
Humbarger loam, occasionally flooded3593277511509662wsd2ks16719801:24000
Humbarger loam, channeled37652336011508582twlfks19519861:24000
Humbarger loam, occasionally flooded3593747911508592wsd2ks19519861:24000
Humbarger loam, occasionally flooded3593422711519412wsddks20319631:24000
Humbarger loam, gravelly substratum3571693516991941v14qne11119711:24000
Humbarger silt loam, very rarely flooded357232416920212zwjxne18119671:20000
Cass and Humbarger soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally floodedCh5168372096dh63tx42119701:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HUMBARGER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .