Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HOWELL soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HOWELL, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HOWELL were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
149A92P049192NJ033003Howell6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.7305565,-75.418335
149A00P0100S1999MD003001Howell6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9222221,-76.5858307

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HOWELL soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HOWELL series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HOWELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HOWELL series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HOWELL share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HOWELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HOWELL series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HOWELL, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. PA-2012-03-12-27 | Bucks and Philadelphia Counties - July 1975

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Urban land-Howell soil association (Soil Survey of Bucks and Philadelphia Counties County, PA; 1975).

Map Units

Map units containing HOWELL as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Howell and Annapolis soils, 15 to 25 percent slopesHME345609587ngb3md00320031:12000
Howell-Annapolis complex, 5 to 10 percent slopesHmC3421377794mchmd00320031:12000
Howell-Dodon complex, 2 to 5 percent slopesHoB3101377844mcnmd00320031:12000
Howell-Dodon complex, 5 to 10 percent slopesHoC2601377854mcpmd00320031:12000
Howell-Annapolis complex, 2 to 5 percent slopesHmB2151377784mcgmd00320031:12000
Howell and Annapolis soils, 10 to 15 percent slopesHMD207609586ngb2md00320031:12000
Howell and Dodon soils, 10 to 15 percent slopesHOD133609589ngb5md00320031:12000
Howell and Dodon soils, 15 to 25 percent slopesHOE62609590ngb6md00320031:12000
Croom-Howell-Collington complex, 25 to 40 percent slopesCsF98024748972p2bdmd03320091:12000
Croom-Howell-Collington complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesCsE86924748962p2bcmd03320091:12000
Croom-Howell-Collington complex, 10 to 15 percent slopesCsD38224748952p2bbmd03320091:12000
Croom-Howell-Urban land complex, 5 to 15 percent slopesCuD16224748982p2bfmd03320091:12000
Howell and Dodon soils, 15 to 25 percent slopesHZE9424552892ndxwmd03320091:12000
Howell and Dodon soils, 10 to 15 percent slopesHZD7424552882ndxvmd03320091:12000
Howell-Annapolis complex, 5 to 10 percent slopesHnC4224552822ndxnmd03320091:12000
Howell and Dodon soils, 25 to 40 percent slopesHZF4024552902ndxxmd03320091:12000
Howell and Annapolis soils, 15 to 25 percent slopesHOE3624552852ndxrmd03320091:12000
Howell-Dodon complex, 2 to 5 percent slopesHwB3424552862ndxsmd03320091:12000
Howell-Dodon complex, 5 to 10 percent slopesHwC2324552872ndxtmd03320091:12000
Howell and Annapolis soils, 10 to 15 percent slopesHOD1924552832ndxpmd03320091:12000
Howell-Annapolis complex, 2 to 5 percent slopesHnB824552812ndxmmd03320091:12000
Howell-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopesHowB108033473532ztyynj00719641:12000
Howell-Urban land complex, 5 to 10 percent slopesHowC156710873rvqdnj00719641:12000
Urban land-Howell complexUh430414795721lnm4pa10119711:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HOWELL soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .