Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HORSEFLAT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HORSEFLAT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HORSEFLAT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HORSEFLAT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HORSEFLAT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HORSEFLAT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HORSEFLAT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HORSEFLAT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HORSEFLAT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HORSEFLAT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HORSEFLAT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. WA-2010-11-05-01 | Douglas County - 2008

    Cross-section view of soils that formed in residuum and colluvium or loess over older loess over basalt and receive 9 to 12 inches of precipitation (Soil Survey of Douglas County, Washington; 2008).

  2. WA-2012-05-11-42 | Douglas County - May 2008

    Cross-section of soils that formed in residuum and colluvium or loess over older loess over basalt and receive 9 to 12 inches of precipitation (Soil Survey of Douglas County, Washington; May 2008).

Map Units

Map units containing HORSEFLAT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Argabak-Horseflat complex, 0 to 30 percent slopes2512200699279rgndwa01719981:12000
Argabak-Horseflat-Toler complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes2612011704317rmwxwa01719981:12000
Zen-Argabak-Horseflat complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes4938638704315rmwvwa01719981:12000
Argabak-Horseflat-Zen complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes277361699281rgngwa01719981:12000
Toler-Horseflat complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes4207095704475rn20wa01719981:12000
Toler-Horseflat-Ralls complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes4246540704473rn1ywa01719981:12000
Toler-Horseflat complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes4215098704476rn21wa01719981:12000
Winblow-Argabak-Horseflat complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes4854722704105rmp2wa01719981:12000
Toler-Horseflat-Benwy complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes4233687704472rn1xwa01719981:12000
Toler-Horseflat-Ralls complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes4252660704474rn1zwa01719981:12000
Toler-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes422960699581rgz4wa01719981:12000
Zen-Horseflat complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes494858699577rgz0wa01719981:12000
Zen-Horseflat-Ralls complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes497793699575rgyywa01719981:12000
Zen-Horseflat-Benwy complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes496567699574rgyxwa01719981:12000
Toler-Horseflat complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes419293699568rgyqwa01719981:12000
Zen-Horseflat-Ralls complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes498199699576rgyzwa01719981:12000
Zen-Horseflat complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes495191699578rgz1wa01719981:12000
Toler-Argabak-Horseflat complex, 0 to 20 percent slopes41581700584rj0hwa01719981:12000
Grinrod-Horseflat-Rubble land complex, 30 to 75 percent slopes431849768722kzrwa63720081:24000
Grinrod-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes429285768712kzqwa63720081:24000
Horseflat very cobbly loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes465273768992l0mwa63720081:24000
Ralock-Horseflat complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes476254769092l0ywa63720081:24000
Grinrod-Horseflat complex, 45 to 60 percent slopes958102773462lh1wa63720081:24000
Stacker-Horseflat complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes7326409764622kkjwa63920031:24000
Horseflat cobbly silt loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes7774549765062klywa63920031:24000
Stacker-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes7314155764612kkhwa63920031:24000
Goodnoe-Swalecreek-Horseflat complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes10324085761372k71wa63920031:24000
Stacker-Horseflat complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes7301661764602kkgwa63920031:24000
Stacker-Swalecreek-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes10311488766112kqbwa63920031:24000
Stacker-Swalecreek-Horseflat complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes1030911761362k70wa63920031:24000
Tronsen-Goldendale-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1017512761302k6twa63920031:24000
Horseflat cobbly silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes776290765052klxwa63920031:24000
Tronsen-Goodnoe-Horseflat complex, 30 to 65 percent slopes1018282761322k6wwa63920031:24000
Horseflat cobbly silt loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes775191765032klvwa63920031:24000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Horseflat, very stony complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes37174870867222x7hwa67620141:12000
Horseflat very cobbly loam, 35 to 70 percent slopes, very stony2034390861332wmhwa67620141:12000
Clerf-Horseflat, dry complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes, very stony38122670867162x79wa67620141:12000
Horseflat very cobbly loam, 12 to 35 percent slopes, very stony2022280861112wlswa67620141:12000
Horseflat, very stony-Walla Walla complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes2062280861312wmfwa67620141:12000
Cheviot, extremely stony-Horseflat, very stony complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes37162130867252x7lwa67620141:12000
Clerf-Horseflat, dry complex, 12 to 35 percent slopes, very stony38112020867172x7bwa67620141:12000
Clerf, very stony-Cheviot, extremely stony-Horseflat, very stony complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes38041570867202x7fwa67620141:12000
Horseflat, very stony-Walla Walla complex, 20 to 35 percent slopes2051190861322wmgwa67620141:12000
Horseflat very cobbly loam, 0 to 12 percent slopes, very stony201580861212wm3wa67620141:12000
Kiona, extremely stony-Horseflat, very stony-Tanawit complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes2102450866432x4ywa67620141:12000
Argabak-Horseflat complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes85913707492cm7wa68119941:24000
Grinrod-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes815519712172d3bwa68119941:24000
Grinrod-Horseflat complex, 45 to 60 percent slopes822796712182d3cwa68119941:24000
Ralock-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1282273707942cnpwa68119941:24000
Norod-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1112200707772cn4wa68119941:24000
Norod-Horseflat complex, 45 to 60 percent slopes1131955707792cn6wa68119941:24000
Horseflat very cobbly loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes841792712202d3fwa68119941:24000
Norod-Ralock-Horseflat complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes1151750707812cn8wa68119941:24000
Norod-Ralock-Horseflat complex, 45 to 60 percent slopes1161691707822cn9wa68119941:24000
Norod-Ralock-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes1141096707802cn7wa68119941:24000
Argabak-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes91069707502cm8wa68119941:24000
Caliralls-Horseflat complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes34651708822crjwa68119941:24000
Horseflat very cobbly loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes85448712212d3gwa68119941:24000
Norod-Horseflat complex, 30 to 45 percent slopes112395707782cn5wa68119941:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HORSEFLAT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .