Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HOOLIGAN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HOOLIGAN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HOOLIGAN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HOOLIGAN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HOOLIGAN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HOOLIGAN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HOOLIGAN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HOOLIGAN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HOOLIGAN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HOOLIGAN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HOOLIGAN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HOOLIGAN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Doolittle-Hooligan-Knep complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes, landslides913E16625980232ppbfmt60520071:24000
Hooligan-Inabnit complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes19E125185951820dzgmt60520071:24000
Hooligan-Inabnit, very stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes119D1082598028217fwmt60520071:24000
Doolittle-Philipsburg-Hooligan complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes62D86185953420dzzmt60520071:24000
Hooligan-Monaberg complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes45Dbh86185974320f6qmt60520071:24000
Ratiopeak, very stony-Hooligan-Philipsburg complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes148E3124038352lpd2mt60520071:24000
Hooligan-Inabnit, extremely stony complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes19E-H324037642lp9smt60520071:24000
Hooligan-Inabnit complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes19E4356811327w77vmt61020051:24000
Hooligan-Monaberg complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes45D3743815760wcvvmt61020051:24000
Doolittle-Philipsburg-Hooligan complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes62D285014003431j05cmt61020051:24000
Ratiopeak, very stony-Hooligan-Philipsburg complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes148E531414767151lkmzmt61220111:24000
Hooligan-Knep-Doolittle complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes813E369624850742pdxpmt61220111:24000
Hooligan-Inabnit, extremely stony complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes19E285714788121lmtmmt61220111:24000
Tongue River-Hooligan-Leavitt complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes821F105324851792pf12mt61220111:24000
Hooligan-Inabnit, very stony complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes119D9921883990217fwmt61220111:24000
Hooligan-Leavitt complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes818D87024856212pfhbmt61220111:24000
Hooligan-Knep-Doolittle complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes813E158524929482pdxpmt61420121:24000
Tongue River-Hooligan-Leavitt complex, 8 to 45 percent slopes821F136524929502pf12mt61420121:24000
Doolittle-Hooligan-Knep complex, 4 to 35 percent slopes, landslides913E80925187302ppbfmt61420121:24000
Hooligan-Leavitt complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes818D12525207492pfhbmt61420121:24000
Ratiopeak, very stony-Hooligan-Philipsburg complex, 8 to 35 percent slopes148E9125207261lkmzmt61420121:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HOOLIGAN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .