Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HONKER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HONKER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HONKER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HONKER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HONKER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HONKER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HONKER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HONKER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HONKER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HONKER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HONKER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. CA-2011-05-27-06 | Merced County, Western Part - 2002

    Typical pattern of the soils and parent materials on the mountains and foothills of the Coast Range (Soil Survey of Merced County, California, Western Part; 2002).

Map Units

Map units containing HONKER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gonzaga-Honker-Franciscan complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 1516481304620562wv8jca07719901:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Gonzaga complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 1517675954620682wv8lca07719901:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Honker, eroded, complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 1517854604620702wv8nca07719901:24000
Gonzaga-Honker-Franciscan complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 1516537654620572wv8kca07719901:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Honker, eroded, complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 1517719104620692wv8mca07719901:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Honker, eroded, complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15611ws7004362wv8nca60919631:20000
Gonzaga-Honker-Franciscan complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15165414566422wv8kca60919631:20000
Gonzaga-Honker-Franciscan complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15601276954669832wv8kca64219981:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Honker, eroded, complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15611194304669852wv8nca64219981:24000
Gonzaga-Honker-Franciscan complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 15600140654669822wv8jca64219981:24000
Franciscan-Quinto-Honker complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15625104404669912tz11ca64219981:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Honker, eroded, complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 1561054254669842wv8mca64219981:24000
Millsholm-Honker-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 1563032404669922vbttca64219981:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Gonzaga complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 1561227704669862wv8lca64219981:24000
Honker-Gaviota complex, 50 to 70 percent slopes6141300466988hny4ca64219981:24000
Honker-Gaviota complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes613885466987hny3ca64219981:24000
Honker-Quinto complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes615260466989hny5ca64219981:24000
Millsholm-Honker-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes631200466993hny9ca64219981:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Honker, eroded, complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15611ws17186996462wv8nca64619671:24000
Millsholm-Honker-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 15630ws6026996522vbttca64619671:24000
Honker-Gaviota complex, 50 to 70 percent slopes614ws574699648rh19ca64619671:24000
Gonzaga-Honker-Franciscan complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15601ws2916996432wv8kca64619671:24000
Honker sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes194wm262699675rh25ca64619671:24000
Gonzaga-Honker-Franciscan complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 15600ws1096994242wv8jca64619671:24000
Franciscan-Quinto-Honker complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15625ws846996512tz11ca64619671:24000
Honker-Quinto complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes615ws48699649rh1bca64619671:24000
Honker-Gaviota complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes613ws44699647rh18ca64619671:24000
Honker-Quinto complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes197wm35817077wf7bca64619671:24000
Honker-Vallecitos-Honker, eroded, complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 15610ws336996452wv8mca64619671:24000
Fifield-Honker-Gonzaga complex, 50 to 65 percent slopes, MLRA 15184wm86996742tz0zca64619671:24000
Franciscan-Quinto-Honker complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes, MLRA 15188107604628402tz11ca64719841:24000
Millsholm-Honker-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes, MLRA 1521747404628692vbttca64719841:24000
Honker-Millsholm-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes1963250462848hjmlca64719841:24000
Fifield-Honker-Gonzaga complex, 50 to 65 percent slopes, MLRA 1518427304628362tz0zca64719841:24000
Gonzaga-Honker , 30 to 50 percent slopes1902350462842hjmdca64719841:24000
Honker sandy loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes1942260462846hjmjca64719841:24000
Honker-Quinto complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes197970462849hjmmca64719841:24000
Gonzaga-Honker , 50 to 65 percent slopes191870462843hjmfca64719841:24000
Honker sandy loam, 50 to 65 percent slopes195600462847hjmkca64719841:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HONKER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .