Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HOFFLAND soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HOFFLAND, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HOFFLAND were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
6581P012880NE161006Hoffland6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.3377762,-102.4380569
6581P012980NE161007Hoffland7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties42.2647209,-102.4308319
6506N1091S2006NE117023Hoffland7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties41.662571,-101.3405609

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HOFFLAND soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HOFFLAND series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HOFFLAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HOFFLAND series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HOFFLAND share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HOFFLAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HOFFLAND series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HOFFLAND, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NE-2010-09-09-03 | Garden County - 1999

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Valent-Wildhorse-Ipage calcareous association (Soil Survey of Garden County, Nebraska; 1999).

  2. NE-2012-02-13-02 | Garden County - 1999

    Typical pattern of the soils and underlying material in the Valent-Wildhorse-Ipage calcareous association (Soil Survey of Garden County, Nebraska; 1999).

  3. NE-2012-02-13-55 | Morrill County - August 1985

    Pattern of soils, topography, and underlying material in the Valentine association (Soil Survey of Morrill County, Nebraska; August 1985).

  4. NE-2012-02-13-95 | Sheridan County - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Valent association (Soil Survey of Sheridan County, Nebraska; 2002).

  5. NE-2012-02-13-96 | Sheridan County - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Valent-Wildhorse association (Soil Survey of Sheridan County, Nebraska; 2002).

Map Units

Map units containing HOFFLAND as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Valentine-Hoffland, complex, frequently ponded, 0 to 24 percent slopes486569724357442s821ne00519731:24000
Ipage, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes436966122190852zbdzne00519731:24000
Wildhorse-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes489761824347362v9wkne00519731:24000
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes453629422190832s810ne00519731:24000
Hoffland mucky peat46364553577912ymc5ne01319801:20000
Wildhorse-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes48971122174702v9wkne01319801:20000
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes4635422174752wgdbne01319801:20000
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes4536137131003722s810ne03119951:24000
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes463593381003892wgdbne03119951:24000
Hoffland mucky peat463614901003902ymc5ne03119951:24000
Hoffland mucky peat46361422175572ymc5ne04519731:20000
Wildhorse-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes4897853016987872v9wkne06919951:20000
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes4635618016987442wgdbne06919951:20000
Hoffland mucky peat4636270716987452ymc5ne06919951:20000
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes463532722192832wgdbne07519731:24000
Valentine-Hoffland, complex, frequently ponded, 0 to 24 percent slopes48657726686692s821ne07519731:24000
Hoffland mucky peat46365422192842ymc5ne07519731:24000
Wildhorse-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes48974026686712v9wkne07519731:24000
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes45362922192792s810ne07519731:24000
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes453643826686812s810ne09119611:24000
Wildhorse-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes489720726687052v9wkne09119611:24000
Valentine-Hoffland, complex, frequently ponded, 0 to 24 percent slopes48658726687032s821ne09119611:24000
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes4520238617002162s810ne11719661:31680
Ipage, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes436997817002392zbdzne11719661:31680
Valentine-Hoffland, complex, frequently ponded, 0 to 24 percent slopes486585217002352s821ne11719661:31680
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes4635732922203572wgdbne12319811:20000
Hoffland mucky peat4636165516926162ymc5ne12319811:20000
Wildhorse-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes4897226161006632v9wkne16119921:20000
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes453641761005832s810ne16119921:20000
Hoffland mucky peat463628781005942ymc5ne16119921:20000
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes463516191005932wgdbne16119921:20000
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesT052A110213900572s810sd00720041:20000
Elsmere, calcareous-hoffland complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesT058A71213900631hngrsd00720041:20000
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesT077A30013900732wgdbsd00720041:20000
Hoffland mucky peatT078A15513900742ymc5sd00720041:20000
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesT052A127313915452s810sd12119671:31680
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesT077A35013915572wgdbsd12119671:31680
Elsmere, calcareous-hoffland complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesT058A32013915511hq0rsd12119671:31680
Hoffland mucky peatT078A16013915582ymc5sd12119671:31680
Els, calcareous-Hoffland complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesT052A57825827622s810sd61320111:24000
Hoffland fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopesT077A24725827732wgdbsd61320111:24000
Elsmere, calcareous-hoffland complex, 0 to 2 percent slopesT058A16225827671hv2wsd61320111:24000
Hoffland mucky peatT078A525827742ymc5sd61320111:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HOFFLAND soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .