Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HILTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HILTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HILTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
10140A0270S1961NY055001Hilton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.2166672,-77.9666672
10140A0271S1961NY073006Hilton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.3080559,-78.1902771
10140A0272S1961NY073008Hilton6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties43.1663895,-78.2563858

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HILTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HILTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HILTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HILTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HILTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HILTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HILTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HILTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NY-2012-02-15-05 | Cayuga County - 1971

    Typical cross section of Ontario association in the north-central part of the county (Soil Survey of Cayuga County, New York; 1971).

  2. NY-2012-02-15-17 | Genesee County - March 1969

    Cross section showing typical soil patterns in the Ontario-Hilton association, the Collamer-Galen-Canandaigua-Lamson association, and the Muck association in northern Genesee County (Soil Survey of Genesee County, New York; March 1969).

  3. NY-2012-02-15-29 | Madison County - March 1981

    Typical relationship of soils and underlying material in Hilton-Appleton, gently sloping (Soil Survey of Madison County, New York; March 1981).

  4. NY-2012-02-15-35 | Niagara County - October 1972

    Typical cross section of the Appleton-Hilton-Sun association (Soil Survey of Niagara County, New York; October 1972).

  5. NY-2012-02-15-36 | Niagara County - October 1972

    Typical cross section of the Hilton-Ovid-Ontario association (Soil Survey of Niagara County, New York; October 1972).

  6. NY-2012-02-15-38 | Niagara County - October 1972

    Typical cross section of the Odessa-Lakemont-Ovid association (Soil Survey of Niagara County, New York; October 1972).

Map Units

Map units containing HILTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hilton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHlB49882894122w3ldny01119681:15840
Hilton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHlA11712894112wrdqny01119681:15840
Hilton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHlB80213017142w3ldny03720041:24000
Hilton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHlA43443017132wrdqny03720041:24000
Hilton silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesHlC291125183272w3l0ny04320181:24000
Hilton silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHlB193725183262w3l9ny04320181:24000
Ontario-Hilton complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes167B1671131057872ywl6ny05120191:24000
Hilton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes67B645631056952w3ldny05120191:24000
Ontario-Hilton complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes167A92331057862ywl5ny05120191:24000
Hilton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes67A85431056942wrdqny05120191:24000
Hilton loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes67C53231056962y9w8ny05120191:24000
Hilton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHlB20542925642w3ldny05319751:15840
Hilton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHlA9572925632wrdqny05319751:15840
Hilton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHlB241972927072w3ldny05519671:15840
Hilton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHlA133492927062wrdqny05519671:15840
Hilton fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHfB24212927052w3l7ny05519671:15840
Hilton fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHfA13832927042w3l6ny05519671:15840
Hilton-Cazenovia complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, stonyHmB6802927092w3l2ny05519671:15840
Hilton-Cazenovia complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, stonyHmA2412927082w3l1ny05519671:15840
Hilton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHlB75192935732w3ldny06719731:20000
Hilton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHlA26832935722wrdqny06719731:20000
Hilton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHbB272212940362w3ldny07319731:15840
Hilton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHbA79142940352wrdqny07319731:15840
Hilton loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, bedrock substratumHcA42602940372w3ktny07319731:15840
Hilton-Cazenovia complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes, stonyHnB22422940392w3l3ny07319731:15840
Hilton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, bedrock substratumHcB20462940382w3kvny07319731:15840
Hilton gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHnB222942957332w3lbny11719721:15840
Hilton gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHnA90362957322w3lcny11719721:15840
Hilton gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, bedrock substratumHoB16342957362w3kyny11719721:15840
Hilton gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, bedrock substratumHoA13392957352w3kxny11719721:15840
Hilton gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesHnC11872957342w3kwny11719721:15840
Hilton silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHlA85832930032w3kzny66419681:15840
Hilton gravelly loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHgA76022930012w3lcny66419681:15840
Hilton silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHlB63582930042w3l9ny66419681:15840
Hilton gravelly loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHgB28852930022w3lbny66419681:15840
Hilton and Cayuga soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, bedrock substratumHmA24162930052w3l4ny66419681:15840
Hilton and Cayuga soils, 3 to 8 percent slopes, bedrock substratumHmB8682930062w3l5ny66419681:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HILTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .