Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HIGHFIELD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HIGHFIELD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HIGHFIELD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
130A61PA0010111961PA001011Highfield4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.9955556,-77.3113889
130A61PA0010121961PA001012Highfield4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.755,-77.3991667
130A40A4190S1952VA107004Highfield4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1566696,-77.8044739

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HIGHFIELD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HIGHFIELD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HIGHFIELD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HIGHFIELD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HIGHFIELD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HIGHFIELD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HIGHFIELD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HIGHFIELD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. PA-2010-09-30-03 | Adams County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Edgemont-Highfield-Catoctin general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Adams County, Pennsylvania; 2005).

  2. PA-2012-03-13-21 | Cumberland and Perry Counties - April 1986

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hazleton-Clymer association (Soil Survey of Cumberland and Perry Counties, PA; 1986).

  3. PA-2012-03-13-29 | Franklin County - August 1975

    Relationship of underlying material and topography in association 4 (Soil Survey of Franklin County, PA; 1975).

Map Units

Map units containing HIGHFIELD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 65 percent slopesReF8228534857kykgmd02120011:12000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesReD5627534856kykfmd02120011:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesHgC3434534820kyj8md02120011:12000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesReC3415534855kykdmd02120011:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stonyHhC2683534823kyjcmd02120011:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyHhD2549534824kyjdmd02120011:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very stonyHhB2181534822kyjbmd02120011:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHgB2050534819kyj7md02120011:12000
Catoctin-Highfield complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes, very rockyCdE1999559033lrqbmd02120011:12000
Catoctin-Highfield complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very rockyCdC1867534938kyn2md02120011:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopesHgD1169534821kyj9md02120011:12000
Catoctin-Highfield complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very rockyCdB1104534937kyn1md02120011:12000
Catoctin-Highfield complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very rockyCdD759534939kyn3md02120011:12000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesReB410534854kykcmd02120011:12000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesReD781534483ky5dmd04319981:12000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesReC641534482ky5cmd04319981:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes. very stonyHtC510534588ky8smd04319981:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, very stonyHtB437534585ky8pmd04319981:12000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 65 percent slopesReF389534484ky5fmd04319981:12000
Highfield gravelly silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyHtD7534590ky8vmd04319981:12000
Highfield channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesHgC12035545596l9qwpa00119911:24000
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 25 to 70 percent slopes, very stonyHMF9306545593l9qspa00119911:24000
Highfield, Catoctin, and Myersville soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyHKD8302545592l9qrpa00119911:24000
Highfield channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHgB7847545595l9qvpa00119911:24000
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopesHHD4641545590l9qppa00119911:24000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 25 percent slopesRcD2751545640l9s9pa00119911:24000
Highfield, Catoctin, and Myersville soils, 0 to 8 percent slopes, very stonyHKB1902545591l9qqpa00119911:24000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 15 percent slopesRcC525545639l9s8pa00119911:24000
Ravenrock-Highfield-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 65 percent slopesRcF415545641l9sbpa00119911:24000
Highfield very stony silt loam, 8 to 25 percent slopesHhD4082693753r8x4pa04119801:15840
Highfield channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesHgC2526693751r8x2pa04119801:15840
Highfield channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHgB2443693750r8x1pa04119801:15840
Highfield very stony silt loam, 25 to 50 percent slopesHhF1613693754r8x5pa04119801:15840
Highfield very stony silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesHhB1140693752r8x3pa04119801:15840
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 3 to 8 percent slopesHSB1143545126l97qpa05519991:24000
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 8 to 25 percent slopes, extremely stonyHTD790545130l97vpa05519991:24000
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 25 to 50 percent slopes, extremely stonyHTF554545131l97wpa05519991:24000
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes, extremely stonyHTB349545129l97tpa05519991:24000
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 8 to 15 percent slopesHSC345545127l97rpa05519991:24000
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopesHSD69545128l97spa05519991:24000
Highfield, Catoctin, and Myersville soils, 8 to 25 percent slopes, very stonyHKD490542860l6wmpa13319901:24000
Highfield channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopesHgC444542866l6wtpa13319901:24000
Highfield channery silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHgB367542865l6wspa13319901:24000
Highfield and Catoctin channery silt loams, 15 to 25 percent slopesHHD208542859l6wlpa13319901:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HIGHFIELD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .