Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HENSLEY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HENSLEY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HENSLEY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
80B84P078084TX429007Hensley7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties32.7561111,-98.8036118

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HENSLEY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HENSLEY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HENSLEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HENSLEY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HENSLEY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HENSLEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HENSLEY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HENSLEY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. TX-2010-11-03-43 | Jack County - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Hensley-Palopinto general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Jack County, Texas; 2005).

  2. TX-2012-03-21-54 | Palo Pinto County - August 1981

    Typical pattern of soils in the Palopinto-Set-Hensley map unit (Soil Survey of Palo Pinto County, TX; 1981).

  3. TX-2012-03-21-68 | Shackelford County - February 1990

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Leeray-Throck-Nukrum map unit (Soil Survey of Shackelford County, TX; 1990).

  4. TX-2012-03-21-73 | Shackelford County - February 1990

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Truce-Chaney-Bonti map unit (Soil Survey of Shackelford County, TX; 1990).

  5. TX-2012-03-21-80 | Stephens County - May 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Bluegrove-Thurber-Leeray general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Stephens County, TX; 1994).

  6. TX-2012-03-21-81 | Stephens County - May 1994

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Palopinto-Lindy-Hensley general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Stephens County, TX; 1994).

  7. TX-2012-03-21-89 | Stonewall County - January 1975

    Talpa-Yates soil association (Soil Survey of Stonewall County, TX; 1975).

  8. TX-2012-03-22-24 | Wise County - May 1989

    Typical pattern of the Palopinto-Hensley-Lindy general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Wise County, TX; 1989).

Map Units

Map units containing HENSLEY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hensley clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHeB3025362714d5fgtx02319711:24000
Hensley stony loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHnB2764364379d755tx09319741:20000
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHeB2471364378d754tx09319741:20000
Hensley loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes366699364485d78ltx09719731:24000
Hensley stony loam, 1 to 5 percent slopesHnC22558365247d825tx13319721:20000
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHeB3707365246d824tx13319721:20000
Hensley stony loamHn1850365376d86btx14319661:20000
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHeB293365375d869tx14319661:20000
Hensley loam, 3 to 8 percent slopesHnD10698366193d91ptx17119701:20000
Hensley soils, 1 to 3 percent slopesHsB3914366194d91qtx17119701:20000
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes462705367760dbp7tx21719751:20000
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, extremely stonyHnB15658368041dbz9tx23719921:24000
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHeB4498368040dbz8tx23719921:24000
Hensley clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHnB1261368177dc3ptx25119811:20000
Hensley loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes, very stonyHeD3844368859dctptx28119901:24000
Hensley loam, 3 to 5 percent slopesHeC268368858dctntx28119901:24000
Hensley loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, stonyHeB4159369791ddsrtx29919901:24000
Hensley loam, 1 to 8 percent slopesHeD10809370408dffntx31920111:24000
Hensley loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes221778370767dft7tx33719751:24000
Hensley very stony clay loam, 0 to 5 percent slopesHn58751390948f3t7tx36319791:24000
Hensley complex, 0 to 3 percent slopesHnB4743390885f3r6tx36719731:20000
Hensley stony clay loam, gently undulatingHsB2664372062dh50tx41719851:24000
Hensley clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHeB1226372061dh4ztx41719851:24000
Hensley loam, gently sloping, extremely stonyHsB28007372188dh92tx42919851:24000
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHeB1821372187dh91tx42919851:24000
Hensley very stony loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHeB3369373665djtqtx49719841:20000
Hensley stony loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, extremely stonyHsB2292373757djxptx50320031:24000
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopesHnB656373756djxntx50320031:24000
Hensley gravelly loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes17934643739092ysnltx60119771:31680
Hensley loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes153695373907dk2jtx60119771:31680
Hensley loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes161490373908dk2ktx60119771:31680
Hensley stony clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHn42374340dkjhtx60919751:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HENSLEY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .