Soil Data Explorer - HENSHAW

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HENSHAW soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HENSHAW, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HENSHAW were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
114A	PM7610	1976IN133102	Henshaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.5027361,-86.7300806
114A	CL7747	1977IN021047	Henshaw	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.3719333,-87.0407639
115A	GB8502	1985IN051002	Henshaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.4113722,-87.4652778
115A	40A5249	S1960IN027001	Henshaw	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.5647736,-87.1622238
120A	40A4873	S1954KY101012	Henshaw	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.8047218,-87.6916656
122	LW7901	1979IN093001	Henshaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.8358222,-86.4853222
n/a	CT-001	1954-OH027-001	Henshaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	CH-010	1958-OH021-010	Henshaw	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	WA-035	1959-OH165-035	Henshaw	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	RO-089	1961-OH141-089	Henshaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	DL-050	1962-OH041-050	Henshaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	LG-017	1962-OH091-017	Henshaw	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	KX7703	1977IN083003	Henshaw	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	40A4874	S1954KY101013	Henshaw	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HENSHAW soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HENSHAW series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HENSHAW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HENSHAW series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HENSHAW share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HENSHAW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HENSHAW series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HENSHAW, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. IL-2010-09-09-06 | Wayne County -

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Zipp-Sexton-Patton association (Soil Survey of Wayne County, Illinois).

2. IN-2012-01-19-40 | Perry County - September 1969

   Relationship of relief and geologic strata to certain of the soil series represented in Perry County. The vertical scale is greatly exaggerated (Soil Survey of Perry County, Indiana; 1969).

3. KY-2012-01-31-02 | Henderson County - February 1967

   Parent material, position, and pattern of soils in the Uniontown-Dekoven-Henshaw association (Soil Survey of Henderson County, Kentucky; February 1967).

4. KY-2012-02-01-01 | Livingston County - September 1993

   Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Huntington-Otwell-Lindside-Wheeling general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Livingston County, Kentucky; September 1993).

Map Units

Map units containing HENSHAW as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	7483A	136	714028	2wlv2	il069	2003	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	7483A	594	808126	2wlv2	il127	2004	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	7483A	64	608159	2wlv2	il151	2003	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	3483A	1884	2025108	25z92	il191	2008	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	483A	7347	1543919	1ntkv	il193	2006	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	7483A	4712	1543975	1ntmn	il193	2006	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	HbA	1072	159606	5c2l	in021	1980	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	HfeA	285	1652617	1sgp7	in025	1970	1:20000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	HhA	1351	160124	5cm9	in051	1986	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	HdA	1177	161551	5f3b	in055	1984	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HeA	1015	164481	5j4v	in083	1979	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded	HfiAQ	1307	1651540	1sfkh	in093	1982	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	HeA	371	161910	5fgx	in125	1983	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	HeA	8999	159888	5ccp	in129	1978	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam	He	5733	160018	5chw	in147	1966	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HeA	2410	162678	5g8p	in153	1966	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 2 to 4 percent slopes, eroded	HeB2	221	162679	5g8q	in153	1966	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam	He	2723	162740	5gbp	in163	1972	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	HeA	2917	159949	5cfn	in173	1976	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	He	272	1404754	2wlv2	ky033	2005	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	Hn	2208	549061	2wlv2	ky047	1977	1:20000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	Hn	173	549115	2wlv2	ky055	1985	1:20000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	He	8606	549187	2wlv2	ky101	1964	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	Hn	4151	549322	2wlv2	ky139	1989	1:20000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	He	2177	551257	2wlv2	ky183	1983	1:20000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded	HhA	1329	1596139	1qkxc	ky602	1972	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, protected	HaA	979	1597389	1qm6p	ky602	1972	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	HeA	652	1596147	2wlv2	ky602	1972	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded	HfA	144	1597390	1qm6q	ky602	1972	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	HeA	1876	2232236	2wlv2	ky610	1968	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded	HeB	78	2623433	2qyk3	ky610	1968	1:12000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	He	4044	549388	2wlv2	ky615	1971	1:20000
Henshaw-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	uHeuA	269	3098746	2wv5b	ky615	1971	1:20000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	He	4074	551104	2wlv2	ky631	1976	1:20000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded	He	4673	549507	2wlv2	ky635	1978	1:20000
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HoA	675	169769	5pnf	oh017	1977	1:15840
Urban land-Henshaw complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	UHoA	261	3381099	30tq5	oh017	1977	1:15840
Henshaw-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HoUA	178	3381098	30tq4	oh017	1977	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HeA	121	171445	5rdh	oh021	1966	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	HeB	64	171446	5rdj	oh021	1966	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HeA	146	169239	5p3b	oh047	1968	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HoA	521	169403	5p8m	oh061	1980	1:15840
Urban land-Alfic Udarents-Henshaw complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes	UAHXB	115	2652882	2qy7f	oh061	1980	1:15840
Henshaw-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HoUA	35	3404824	30tq4	oh061	1980	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HeA	711	171122	5r22	oh091	1977	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	HeB	229	171123	5r23	oh091	1977	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes	HnA	457	171268	5r6s	oh129	1977	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes	HeA	12	170884	5qtd	oh141	1997	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HeA	386	1406073	1j646	oh159	1970	1:15840
Henshaw silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes	HoB	828	171356	5r9m	oh165	1967	1:20000
Urban land-Henshaw complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes	UHoB	75	3422266	31gj5	oh165	1967	1:20000
Henshaw-Urban land complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes	HoUB	44	3422265	31gj4	oh165	1967	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HENSHAW soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).