Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HEDVILLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HEDVILLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HEDVILLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
10616N0188S2015NE095501Hedville7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.10253,-97.06041
7479P032279KS143003Hedville6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.1011124,-97.8319473
7402N0463S2001KS029001Hedville7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties39.3514404,-97.5938797

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HEDVILLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HEDVILLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HEDVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HEDVILLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HEDVILLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HEDVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HEDVILLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HEDVILLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KS-2012-01-20-30 | Clay County - September 1984

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Crete-Lancaster-Hedville association (Soil Survey of Clay County, Kansas; 1984).

  2. KS-2012-01-20-59 | Ellsworth County - February 1989

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Lancaster-Hedville-Harney association (Soil Survey of Ellsworth County, Kansas; 1989).

  3. KS-2012-01-24-03 | Lincoln County - May 1985

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Lancaster-Hedville association (Soil Survey of Lincoln County, Kansas; 1985).

  4. KS-2012-01-24-08 | Marion County - December 1983

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Lancaser-Hedville association (Soil Survey of Marion County, Kansas; 1983).

  5. KS-2012-01-24-11 | McPherson County - April 1983

    Typical pattern of soils in the Lancaster-Hedville-Edalgo association (Soil Survey of McPherson County, Kansas; 1983).

  6. KS-2012-01-25-22 | Republic County - November 1967

    Distribution of the soils in the Lancaster-Hedville-Crete association (Soil Survey of Republic County, Kansas; 1967).

  7. KS-2012-01-25-25 | Rice County - December 1974

    Distribution of the soils in the Smolan-Crete-Hobbs association (Soil Survey of Rice County, Kansas; 1974).

  8. KS-2012-01-25-26 | Rice County - December 1974

    Distribution of the soils in the Hedville-Lancaster-Smolan association (Soil Survey of Rice County, Kansas; 1974).

  9. KS-2012-01-25-28 | Saline County - May 1992

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Wells-Crete-Lancaster association (Soil Survey of Saline County, Kansas; 1992).

  10. KS-2012-01-25-29 | Saline County - May 1992

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Lancaster-Hedville-Crete association (Soil Survey of Saline County, Kansas; 1992).

  11. KS-2012-01-26-27 | Washington County - August 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Crete-Lancaster-Longford association (Soil Survey of Washington County, Kansas; 1993).

  12. NE-2012-02-08-17 | Gage County - May 1964

    Schematic diagram showing the relationship of major soil series to parent materials in Gage County, Nebraska (Soil Survey of Gage County, Nebraska; May 1964).

Map Units

Map units containing HEDVILLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396261126687562r8ygks00919791:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33962312726687642r8ygks02719831:24000
Edalgo-Hedville complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes336417914546352tpwjks02719831:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33961217726687672r8ygks02919721:24000
Hedville stony loam, 5 to 30 percent slopes3380553213820302ww0lks02919721:24000
Edalgo-Hedville complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes336437113820292tpwjks02919721:24000
Hedville-Rock Outcrop complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes33822213820312ww0nks02919721:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396280626687692r8yjks03319871:24000
Hedville-Rock Outcrop complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes338245813812622ww0tks03319871:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396626126687732r8ygks04119771:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33968114626687772r8ygks05319851:24000
Edalgo-Hedville loams, 7 to 15 percent slopes33652439213822092tpwkks05319851:24000
Edalgo-Hedville loams, 15 to 40 percent slopes3366501213822082tpwlks05319851:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396558926687822r8yjks09719831:24000
Hedville-Rock Outcrop complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes338260313805182ww0tks09719831:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33964159826687842r8ygks10519831:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33966250226687942r8ygks11319801:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396706426687912r8ygks11519811:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396165426687962r8ygks12319771:24000
Edalgo-Hedville complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes33647610513821212tpwjks14319781:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396785626688052r8ygks14319781:24000
Hedville-Rock Outcrop complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes3382452813821282ww0nks14319781:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396475326688072r8ygks15719651:24000
Hedville-Lancaster complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes3381505514332312ww0mks15919711:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes3396435226688092r8ygks15919711:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33962014926688132r8ygks16719801:24000
Edalgo-Hedville loams, 15 to 40 percent slopes336638111509512tpwlks16719801:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33969237026688152r8ygks16919891:24000
Lancaster-Hedville complex, 3 to 20 percent slopes33964714126688242r8ygks20119881:24000
Hedville sandy loam, 7 to 20 percent slopes411117716914671ts3gne02519811:20000
Hedville cobbly loam, 7 to 30 percent slopes410980816911032ww0qne06720001:12000
Hedville loam, 7 to 30 percent slopes4110295916918082ww0rne09519701:20000
Hedville loam, 30 to 50 percent slopes4108217016918292ww0pne09519701:20000
Hedville sandy loam, 7 to 30 percent slopes411228816913582ww0sne10919771:20000
Hedville, Sogn, and Contrary soils, 12 to 75 percent slopes411337217110101vffwne15320071:12000
Hedville cobbly loam, 7 to 30 percent slopes41098716914222ww0qne15519951:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HEDVILLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .