Soil Data Explorer - HAYTER

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HAYTER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HAYTER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HAYTER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
125	83P0701	82KY195003	Hayter	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.5294456,-82.5941696

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HAYTER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HAYTER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAYTER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAYTER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HAYTER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAYTER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAYTER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HAYTER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. KY-2010-09-03-19 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

   Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topograhy in the Upshur-Vandalia-Rarden general soil map unit. This map unit is on the mountains (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

2. KY-2012-01-27-08 | Caldwell County - September 1966

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in association 2 (Soil Survey of Caldwell County, Kentucky; September 1966).

3. KY-2012-01-27-09 | Caldwell County - September 1966

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying materials in association 3 (Soil Survey of Caldwell County, Kentucky; September 1966).

4. KY-2012-02-01-37 | Pike County - June 1990

   Along the Levisa and Russell Forks of the Big Sandy River, the soils in the valleys are in the Nelse-Shelbiana-Udorthents general soil map unit and those on the mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

5. KY-2012-02-01-38 | Pike County - June 1990

   Along the major tributaries in Pike County, the soils on the mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb general soil map unit and those in the valleys are in the Yeager-Grigsby-Potomac-Hayter map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

6. KY-2012-02-01-39 | Pike County - June 1990

   Along Elkhorn Creek and Pine Mountain, the upper faulted mountains are in the Kimper-Sharondale-Berks-Shelocta general soil map unit, the lower mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb map unit, and the valley is in the Yeager-Grigsby-Potomac-Hayter map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

Map Units

Map units containing HAYTER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Hayter-Donahue complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes, very rocky	uHadF	860	2517033	2q97q	ky053	1990	1:20000
Hayter-Potomac-Stokly complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes	HpC	13645	550036	lgc3	ky195	1986	1:24000
Hayter loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes	HaD	2707	550035	lgc2	ky195	1986	1:24000
Hayter loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes	HaC	1171	550034	lgc1	ky195	1986	1:24000
Hayter-Donahue complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes, very rocky	uHadF	1682	2517031	2q97q	ky231	1985	1:20000
Hayter silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	HsB	812	550395	lgqp	ky605	1975	1:20000
Hayter silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	HsC	617	550396	lgqq	ky605	1975	1:20000
Hayter loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes	HtE	304	550397	lgqr	ky605	1975	1:20000
Hayter-Grigsby complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes	HaC	2353	550905	lh84	ky640	1996	1:24000
Hayter-Vandalia channery loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes	HkE	3161	536511	l08t	oh167	1973	1:15840
Hayter-Vandalia stony complex, 25 to 50 percent slopes	HkF	2540	536512	l08v	oh167	1973	1:15840
Hayter loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes	HgE	1139	536508	l08q	oh167	1973	1:15840
Hayter loam, 12 to 18 percent slopes	HgD	830	536507	l08p	oh167	1973	1:15840
Hayter very stony soils, 18 to 30 percent slopes	HhE	747	536510	l08s	oh167	1973	1:15840
Hayter loam, 25 to 35 percent slopes	HgF	646	536509	l08r	oh167	1973	1:15840
Hayter loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	HgB	295	536505	l08m	oh167	1973	1:15840
Hayter loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes	HgC	142	536506	l08n	oh167	1973	1:15840
Talbott-Hayter silt loams (l)	TH	608	524555	klv4	tn025	1948	1:24000
Talbott-Hayter silt loams, steep phase (l)	THz	375	524556	klv5	tn025	1948	1:24000
Hayter loam, 20 to 40 percent slopes	HaE	370	523870	kl41	tn035	1998	1:24000
Hayter loam, 10 to 20 percent slopes	HaD	360	523869	kl40	tn035	1998	1:24000
Hayter loam, undulating phase	Hd	679	525140	kmg0	tn059	1954	1:15840
Hayter stony loam, undulating phase	Hf	360	525142	kmg2	tn059	1954	1:15840
Hayter loam, eroded rolling phase	Hc	216	525139	kmfz	tn059	1954	1:15840
Hayter stony loam, eroded hilly phase	He	65	525141	kmg1	tn059	1954	1:15840
Standingstone-Hayter complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes, very rocky	uBlhF	23667	2571840	2qh6x	tn133	2003	1:24000
Hayter-Donahue complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes, very rocky	uHadF	3665	2517034	2q97q	tn133	2003	1:24000
Hayter cobbly loam, 35 to 55 percent slopes	HkF	4334	528570	kr0n	tn602	1973	1:15840
Hayter cobbly loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes	HkE	2381	528569	kr0m	tn602	1973	1:15840
Hayter loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes	HhE	2349	528567	kr0k	tn602	1973	1:15840
Hayter loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes	HhC	2012	528565	kr0h	tn602	1973	1:15840
Hayter loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes	HhD	1696	528566	kr0j	tn602	1973	1:15840
Hayter cobbly loam, 10 to 20 percent slopes	HkD	791	528568	kr0l	tn602	1973	1:15840
Standingstone-Hayter complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes, very rocky	uBlhF	8211	2571839	2qh6x	tn604	1974	1:20000
Hayter silt loam, sloping phase	He	570	1899509	21rlh	tn609	1955	1:20000
Hayter silt loam, gently sloping phase	Hd	357	1899508	21rlg	tn609	1955	1:20000
Hayter stony silt loam, sloping phase	Hg	345	1899511	21rlk	tn609	1955	1:20000
Standingstone-Hayter complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes, very rocky	uBlhF	3446	2571838	2qh6x	tn610	1960	1:15840
Hayter-Donahue complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes, very rocky	uHadF	13836	2517032	2q97q	tn701	1985	1:24000
Hayter cobbly loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes	21C	707	521084	kh75	va069	1983	1:15840
Hayter very cobbly loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes	22E	475	521088	kh79	va069	1983	1:15840
Hayter very cobbly loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes	22C	430	521086	kh77	va069	1983	1:15840
Hayter very cobbly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes	22D	357	521087	kh78	va069	1983	1:15840
Hayter cobbly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes	21D	330	521085	kh76	va069	1983	1:15840
Hayter loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes	20B	1327	517092	kc2d	va121	1980	1:15840
Hayter soils, 7 to 15 percent slopes	21C	596	517093	kc2f	va121	1980	1:15840
Hayter loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes	23C	941	519386	kfgd	va191	1998	1:15840
Hayter loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes	23D	299	519387	kfgf	va191	1998	1:15840

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HAYTER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).