Soil Data Explorer - HAYESPRING

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HAYESPRING soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HAYESPRING, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HAYESPRING were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HAYESPRING soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HAYESPRING series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAYESPRING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAYESPRING series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HAYESPRING share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAYESPRING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAYESPRING series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HAYESPRING, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HAYESPRING as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Hayespring ashy loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes	180	5500	1672295	1t450	or620	1992	1:24000
Moonbeam-Senra-Hayespring complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes	189	1600	1672302	1t457	or620	1992	1:24000
Cabinspring-Chesebro-Hayespring complex, 20 to 50 percent slopes	237	6532	1689747	1tq9z	or635	2006	1:24000
Hayespring-Moonbeam complex, cobbly, 2 to 15 percent slopes	355	5709	1689863	1tqfq	or635	2006	1:24000
Senra-Hayespring complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes	583	5109	1690083	1tqnt	or635	2006	1:24000
Moonbeam-Hayespring complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes	464	4924	1689966	1tqk1	or635	2006	1:24000
Lastcall-Hayespring complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	404	3599	1689910	1tqh7	or635	2006	1:24000
Hayespring-Moonbeam complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes	353	3350	1689861	1tqfn	or635	2006	1:24000
Hayespring ashy loamy fine sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes	351	2387	1689859	1tqfl	or635	2006	1:24000
Hayespring-Senra complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes	357	2328	1689865	1tqfs	or635	2006	1:24000
Hayespring-Dunres complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes	352	1974	1689860	1tqfm	or635	2006	1:24000
Moonbeam-Hayespring complex, moist, 2 to 12 percent slopes	465	1635	1689967	1tqk2	or635	2006	1:24000
Hayespring-Moonbeam complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes	354	1572	1689862	1tqfp	or635	2006	1:24000
Senra-Hayespring complex, droughty, 2 to 10 percent slopes	584	1331	1690084	1tqnv	or635	2006	1:24000
Lastcall-Hayespring complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes	403	772	1689909	1tqh6	or635	2006	1:24000
Moonbeam-Senra-Hayespring complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes	469	690	1689971	1tqk6	or635	2006	1:24000
Hayespring-Moonbeam complex, low precipitation, 1 to 8 percent slopes	356	404	1689864	1tqfr	or635	2006	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HAYESPRING soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).