Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HATTONTOWN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HATTONTOWN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HATTONTOWN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
13605N0709S04VA059020-1Hattontown6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9603119,-77.3274612
13605N0710S04VA059021-1Hattontown6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.8230896,-77.4121857

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HATTONTOWN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HATTONTOWN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HATTONTOWN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HATTONTOWN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HATTONTOWN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HATTONTOWN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HATTONTOWN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HATTONTOWN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HATTONTOWN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Urban land-Hattontown complex99173722505442fjw6va05920071:12000
Hattontown-Jackland-Haymarket complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes54B105122504012fjqlva05920071:12000
Hattontown silt loam, 0 to 25 percent slopes5083122503882fjq5va05920071:12000
Hattontown-Jackland-Haymarket complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes54C78122504032fjqnva05920071:12000
Hattontown-Orange complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes56B75222504122fjqyva05920071:12000
Hattontown-Kelly complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes55B52322504072fjqsva05920071:12000
Hattontown-Elbert complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes51A41122503912fjq8va05920071:12000
Hattontown-Orange complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes, very stony57C18422504152fjr1va05920071:12000
Hattontown-Haymarket complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes52C8922503962fjqfva05920071:12000
Hattontown-Haymarket complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes52B4022503942fjqcva05920071:12000
Hattontown-Jackland complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes53A2822503972fjqgva05920071:12000
Hattontown - Orange complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes56B761907904221b9va60020071:12000
Hattontown-Orange complex, 7 to 15 percent slopes, very stony57C2830505352xn6rva60020071:12000
Urban land-Hattontown complex99281912939226kqva60020071:12000
Hattontown silt loam, 0 to 25 percent slopes50231907906221bcva60020071:12000
Hattontown-Haymarket complex, 2 to 7 percent slopes52B1230505342xn6qva60020071:12000
Hattontown - Elbert complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes51A41907900221b5va60020071:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HATTONTOWN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .