Soil Data Explorer - HATTIE

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HATTIE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HATTIE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HATTIE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
102A	40A1692	S1961MN149001	Hattie	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.4824867,-96.079483
102A	UMN1352	S1971MN1491352	Hattie	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.5991364,-95.9039764
56	98P0176	S1997MN125011	HATTIE	8	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	47.9133339,-96.398056

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HATTIE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HATTIE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HATTIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HATTIE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HATTIE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HATTIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HATTIE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HATTIE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HATTIE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Hattie silty clay, 1 to 4 percent slopes	185B	25249	396064	f948	mn011	1990	1:20000
Hattie silty clay, 4 to 10 percent slopes	185C	3660	396065	f949	mn011	1990	1:20000
Hattie clay, 6 to 15 percent slopes	I29D	1490	2799651	prng	mn119	1996	1:20000
Hattie clay, Aspen Parkland, 0 to 2 percent slopes	I29A	4912	2799776	prnf	mn125	2001	1:12000
Hattie clay, 6 to 15 percent slopes	I29D	1958	2799777	prng	mn125	2001	1:12000
Nutley-Hattie clays, 0 to 2 percent slopes	NhA	18722	428363	gcr5	mn149	1966	1:15840
Hattie-Nutley clays, 2 to 6 percent slopes	HnB	9051	428347	gcqn	mn149	1966	1:15840
Hattie clay, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded	HcC2	2300	428345	gcql	mn149	1966	1:15840
Hattie clay, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded	HcD2	700	428346	gcqm	mn149	1966	1:15840
Hattie-Audubon complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes	J60B	528	434853	glhj	mn151	2000	1:12000
Hattie-Audubon complex, 4 to 10 percent slopes	J60C	70	434854	glhk	mn151	2000	1:12000
Hattie clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes	I498A	1709	2643085	2ptwq	nd019	1987	1:20000
Hattie clay loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes	HaD	2758	418157	g13y	sd051	1977	1:20000
Hattie clay loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes	HaE	1045	418158	g13z	sd051	1977	1:20000
Hattie clay loam, 9 to 15 percent slopes	HdD	2385	417836	g0sl	sd109	1977	1:20000
Hattie clay loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes	HdE	511	417837	g0sm	sd109	1977	1:20000
Hattie and Kloten soils, 9 to 25 percent slopes	HkD	346	417838	g0sn	sd109	1977	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HATTIE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).