Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HANKINS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HANKINS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HANKINS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
4300P1200S2000OR013003Hankinsn/aPrimary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.0242805,-120.4835968
43C98P0227S1997OR023017HANKINSn/aPrimary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties44.5672226,-119.4833298

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HANKINS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HANKINS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HANKINS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HANKINS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HANKINS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HANKINS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HANKINS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HANKINS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing HANKINS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hankins silt loam, 12 to 35 percent north slopes65D20556224622ryor60419881:24000
Hankins very cobbly loam, 12 to 35 percent north slopes66D8926224722rzor60419881:24000
Hankins complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes67C4036224822s0or60419881:24000
Hankins-Yawkey complex, 12 to 30 percent south slopes40310883342612323dm4or6181:24000
Hankins-Yawkey complex, dry, 12 to 30 percent south slopes4566463342616423dlxor6181:24000
Hankins-Merlin complex, 0 to 35 percent slopesB500589734347432mstor6181:24000
Hankins cobbly ashy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes4055433342607225xt4or6181:24000
Maule-Hankins-Combsflat complex, 5 to 35 percent slopesT300432834348262mq5or6181:24000
Yawkey-Hankins, cool-Shotsprings complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3449CO37343434907134gqor6181:24000
Hankins cobbly ashy loam, dry, 1 to 12 percent slopes455345334376392mlhor6181:24000
Egyptcreek-Hankins-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 70 percent slopesC760342534349142mv4or6181:24000
Yawkey-Hankins complex, 30 to 65 percent south slopes404321834261472ml7or6181:24000
Hankins-Alding complex, 0 to 50 percent slopesB452290334349662mswor6181:24000
Yawkey-Hankins complex, dry, 30 to 65 percent south slopes457288734261892mlsor6181:24000
Ateron-Maucav-Hankins complex, 5 to 35 percent slopesT520245834350252mv1or6181:24000
Hankins-Maule complex, 5 to 10 percent slopesB60082934261022mq3or6181:24000
Hankins-Maucav-Hafmau complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3439BO29834261492pgdcor6181:24000
Hankins-Luckycreek complex, 0 to 7 percent slopes4252934261202xfvfor6181:24000
Hankins cobbly ashy loam, 10 to 45 percent north slopes131E4342611526blor6181:24000
Hankins-Yawkey-Pilotbutte complex, landslide, 3 to 30 percent north slopes406334260602xfvdor6181:24000
Hankins ashy silt loam, 5 to 35 percent south slopes18E194176128921s2or64819771:24000
Hankins cobbly loam, 15 to 50 percent slopesHaE232476289823fzor66619701:31680
Yawkey-Hankins complex, dry, 30 to 65 percent south slopes457273534626292mlsor66619701:31680
Hankins-Yawkey complex, 12 to 30 percent south slopes4031796346262223dm4or66619701:31680
Hankins cobbly ashy loam, dry, 1 to 12 percent slopes455113134724662mlhor66619701:31680
Hankins-Yawkey complex, dry, 12 to 30 percent south slopes456573346262423dlxor66619701:31680
Yawkey-Hankins complex, 30 to 65 percent south slopes40441734626232ml7or66619701:31680
Hankins cobbly ashy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes40520346261325xt4or66619701:31680
Yawkey-Hankins, cool-Shotsprings complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3449CO193472541134gqor66619701:31680
Hankins silt loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes37C804264491253cor66719841:20000
Hankins silt loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes37E205664492253dor66719841:20000
Hankins-Yawkey-Pilotbutte complex, landslide, 3 to 30 percent north slopes406503234217442xfvdor6771:24000
Hankins cobbly ashy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes4052118342184625xt4or6771:24000
Hankins-Maule complex, 5 to 10 percent slopesB60068034244422mq3or6771:24000
Hankins-Shotsprings-Sharpridge complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3416YO57334244962xfv4or6771:24000
Hankins cobbly ashy loam, 10 to 45 percent north slopes131E549342450226blor6771:24000
Hankins-Luckycreek complex, 0 to 7 percent slopes42542634245642xfvfor6771:24000
Hankins-Yawkey complex, 12 to 30 percent south slopes403400342457923dm4or6771:24000
Yawkey-Hankins complex, 30 to 65 percent south slopes40419034247152ml7or6771:24000
Hankins-Maucav-Hafmau complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes3439BO19034247182pgdcor6771:24000
Hankins-Shotsprings-Sharpridge complex, 30 to 60 percent slopes3416XO11734249302xfv6or6771:24000
Hankins-Yawkey complex, dry, 12 to 30 percent south slopes45693342478823dlxor6771:24000
Yawkey-Hankins complex, dry, 30 to 65 percent south slopes4571534248702mlsor6771:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HANKINS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .