Soil Data Explorer - HAMMONTON

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HAMMONTON soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HAMMONTON, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HAMMONTON were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
149A	10N1321	S2010NJ033001	Hammonton	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.4869944,-75.40845
153C	86P0106	85MD019001	Hammonton	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.6166649,-75.7750015
153C	12N0026	S2011DE001002	Hammonton	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.0336,-75.6419861
153D	40A0345	S1961NJ005001	Hammonton	3	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.8455544,-74.710556
153D	10N1318	S2010NJ011003	Hammonton	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.2167139,-74.9643444
153D	10N1319	S2010NJ011004	Hammonton	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.2208333,-74.9644444
153D	12N0021	S2011DE005001	Hammonton	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.584075,-75.4163528
153D	13N0564	S2012MD045002	Hammonton	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.4163556,-75.72705
153D	13N0565	S2012MD045003	Hammonton	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.4146389,-75.7319472

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HAMMONTON soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HAMMONTON series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAMMONTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAMMONTON series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HAMMONTON share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-06) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAMMONTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAMMONTON series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HAMMONTON, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. MD-2012-02-03-13 | Dorchester County - 1998

   An idealized diagram that illustrates the general relationship of the soils in the Downer drainage catena (Soil Survey of Dorchester County, Maryland; 1998).

2. NJ-2010-09-13-01 | Cumberland County -

   Typical relationship of the soils, landform position, and parent material of soils that formed in loamy materials and sandy eolian deposits. The well drained Aura, Sassafras, Fort Mott, and Downer soils are in the higher landform positions. The moderately well drained Hammonton soils are in the lower landform positions in depressions or on flats (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, New Jersey).

3. NJ-2010-09-13-06 | Salem County - 2008

   Typical relationship of the soils, landform position, and parent material for soils developing in sandy materials (Soil Survey of Salem County, New Jersey; 2008).

4. NJ-2012-02-14-02 | Cape May County - 2002

   The relationship of soils, landform position, and underlying material in the Hammonton general soil map unit. Galloway soils are a minor component in sandy areas. The Berryland and Mullica-Manahawkin general soil map unit occurs in the adjacent lower areas (Soil Survey of Cape May County, New Jerser; 2002).

5. NJ-2012-02-14-03 | Cape May County - 2002

   The relationship of soils, landform position, and underlying material in the Berryland and Mullica-Manahawkin general soil map unit. The Hammonton general soil map unit occurs in the adjacent higher areas (Soil Survey of Cape May County, New Jerser; 2002).

Map Units

Map units containing HAMMONTON as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	4499	1606054	1qx76	de001	2006	1:24000
Ingleside-Hammonton-Fallsington complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ImB	2193	1606076	1qx7x	de001	2006	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	HnB	2191	1606056	1qx78	de001	2006	1:24000
Hammonton-Fallsington-Mullica complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HoA	2063	1606057	1qx79	de001	2006	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HmA	196	1606053	1qx75	de001	2006	1:24000
Ingleside-Hammonton-Fallsington complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ImB	8951	2479773	2p7dp	de003	2009	1:24000
Hammonton-Fallsington-Mullica complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HoA	5183	2479772	2p7dn	de003	2009	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	904	2479787	2p7f4	de003	2009	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HmA	15087	1603413	1qth0	de005	2006	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	5259	1603414	1qth1	de005	2006	1:24000
Ingleside-Hammonton-Fallsington complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ImB	2824	1603427	1qthg	de005	2006	1:24000
Hammonton-Fallsington-Mullica complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HoA	1105	1603415	1qth2	de005	2006	1:24000
Downer-Hammonton-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	DwB	6311	137759	4mbv	md003	2003	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes	DvB	4039	137756	4mbr	md003	2003	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes	DvC	1554	137757	4mbs	md003	2003	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton-Urban land complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes	DwD	1333	137760	4mbw	md003	2003	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes	DvD	563	137758	4mbt	md003	2003	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes	DvC	15	2516855	4mbs	md009	1967	1:20000
Hammonton-Fallsington-Corsica complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HoB	8056	2452688	2nb6z	md011	2009	1:12000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	1914	2452654	2nb5w	md011	2009	1:12000
Ingleside-Hammonton-Fallsington complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ImB	107	2440572	2mxm4	md015	2009	1:12000
Galestown-Hammonton complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	GcB	2789	1608622	1qzx1	md017	2007	1:12000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	8997	128943	4b5g	md019	1992	1:15840
Downer-Hammonton sandy loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes	DhC	127	792813	vlzm	md027	2004	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton sandy loams, 2 to 5 percent slopes	DhB	106	792812	vlzl	md027	2004	1:12000
Hammonton-Fallsington-Mullica complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HoA	100	2702630	2s3pp	md029	1978	1:15840
Ingleside-Hammonton-Fallsington complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	ImB	17	2702636	1qx7x	md029	1978	1:15840
Downer-Hammonton complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes	DoB	1443	2474815	2p27r	md033	2009	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	DuB	958	2474818	2p27v	md033	2009	1:12000
Downer-Hamonton complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes	DoC	825	2474816	2p27s	md033	2009	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton-Urban land complex, 5 to 15 percent slopes	DuD	464	2474819	2p27w	md033	2009	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes	DoD	266	2474817	2p27t	md033	2009	1:12000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HaA	161	2455268	2ndx6	md033	2009	1:12000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	5826	139706	4pcn	md035	1995	1:12000
Hammonton sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	HnB	4544	139707	4pcp	md035	1995	1:12000
Downer-Hammonton sandy loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes	DhC	409	139672	4pbk	md035	1995	1:12000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HmA	844	1407956	1j82y	md039	2006	1:12000
Hammonton-Glassboro complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes	HgB	395	1599013	1qnx2	md039	2006	1:12000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	1	1599556	1qpgl	md039	2006	1:12000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	12	1882966	216cv	md041	2009	1:12000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HnA	4345	975565	11r4v	md045	2005	1:12000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HmA	5678	129313	4bkd	md047	1995	1:12000
Hammonton loamy sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes	HmB	2089	129314	4bkf	md047	1995	1:12000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	12376	745841	t13d	nj001	1975	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	4460	745843	t13g	nj001	1975	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HbmkB	846	745842	t13f	nj001	1975	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, clayey substratum, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HbokA	602	745844	t13h	nj001	1975	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmkB	799	697748	rf20	nj005	1967	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	175	697747	rf1z	nj005	1967	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	6	697749	rf21	nj005	1967	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	58	710919	rvrw	nj007	1964	1:12000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	15183	745572	t0tq	nj009	1997	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	10110	745571	t0tp	nj009	1997	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	10860	135837	4kbv	nj011	2003	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	6909	135836	4kbt	nj011	2003	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	HboB	1314	135838	4kbw	nj011	2003	1:24000
Hammonton-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbrB	524	135839	4kbx	nj011	2003	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	4555	1089473	15kp9	nj015	2004	1:24000
Hammonton-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbrB	467	1089477	15kpf	nj015	2004	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	1308	135384	4jw7	nj023	1985	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmkB	720	135385	4jw8	nj023	1985	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	606	135386	4jw9	nj023	1985	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	874	134780	4j7r	nj025	1985	1:24000
Hammonton-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbrB	637	134783	4j7v	nj025	1985	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	HboB	605	134782	4j7t	nj025	1985	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	570	134781	4j7s	nj025	1985	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmkB	214	134730	4j64	nj025	1985	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	6233	697524	rdts	nj029	1978	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	2920	697525	rdtt	nj029	1978	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, clayey substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmkB	153	697601	rdx8	nj029	1978	1:24000
Hammonton loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes	HbmB	4723	135603	4k39	nj033	2004	1:24000
Hammonton-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HbrB	729	135605	4k3c	nj033	2004	1:24000
Hammonton sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	HboA	57	135604	4k3b	nj033	2004	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HAMMONTON soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).