Soil Data Explorer - HAIG

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HAIG soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HAIG, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HAIG were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
109	M8307902	1983MO079002	Haig	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.2127762,-93.7050018
109	M0704104	2007MO041004	Haig	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.665638,-93.1981659
109	M0704105	2007MO041005	Haig	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	39.6301956,-93.1181946
109	84P0353	83IA053001	Haig	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	40.8672222,-93.7491667
115B	M9115901	1991MO159001	Haig	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	38.9672203,-92.3450012

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HAIG soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HAIG series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAIG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAIG series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HAIG share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the HAIG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the HAIG series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HAIG, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. IA-2010-09-02-17 | Jefferson County - 1999

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Haig-Grundy-Clarinda association (Soil Survey of Jefferson County, Iowa; 1999).

2. IA-2010-09-03-01 | Van Buren County - 2004

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Haig-Grundy-Clarinda association (Soil Survey of Van Buren County, Iowa; 2004).

Map Units

Map units containing HAIG as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	3001	402680	2tfyx	ia007	1970	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	9050	404135	2tfyw	ia039	1987	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	1508	404681	2tfyw	ia051	1988	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	5732	404795	2tfyx	ia053	1986	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	800	405240	2tfyw	ia057	1980	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	5646	406851	2tfyw	ia087	1982	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	363	349	406852	2tfyx	ia087	1982	1:15840
Haig silt loam, benches, 0 to 2 percent slopes	1362	308	406813	fnb0	ia087	1982	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	14570	407795	2tfyw	ia101	1992	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	363	373	407796	2tfyx	ia101	1992	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	16868	408459	2tfyw	ia111	1976	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	363	2167	408460	2tfyx	ia111	1976	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	9526	408925	2tfyw	ia117	1991	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	403	409319	2tfyw	ia123	1971	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	4746	412767	2tfyw	ia125	1976	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	10985	409778	2tfyx	ia135	1982	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	1062	410688	2tfyx	ia159	1987	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	990	411704	2tfyx	ia175	1975	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	17380	413074	2tfyw	ia177	1994	1:12000
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	363	1309	413075	2tfyx	ia177	1994	1:12000
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	9431	411799	2tfyw	ia179	1978	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	363	606	411800	2tfyx	ia179	1978	1:15840
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	362	2546	1860776	2tfyw	ia185	1966	1:15840
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes	7150	1776	1480044	1lp3c	ks087	1974	1:24000
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes	7150	24	1862347	20hxq	ks103	1973	1:24000
Haig silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes	7150	29	1473479	1lg8l	ks177	1966	1:24000
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	30093	28631	2531250	2tfyw	mo037	1981	1:24000
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	30093	1100	2531253	2tfyw	mo049	1981	1:24000
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	30093	487	2531249	2tfyw	mo079	1988	1:24000
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	30093	3009	2531254	2tfyw	mo081	1975	1:24000
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	30093	28919	2531251	2tfyw	mo101	1977	1:24000
Haig silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	30093	1156	2531252	2tfyw	mo159	1990	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HAIG soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).