Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the HACKERS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of HACKERS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to HACKERS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
14769PA0090051969PA009005Hackers5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties40.1105556,-78.6416667
n/aAT-0071960-OH009-007Hackers4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aWS-0191968-OH167-019Hackers4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aLG-0221970-OH091-022Hackers3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/aLG-0231970-OH091-023Hackers4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the HACKERS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the HACKERS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HACKERS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HACKERS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with HACKERS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the HACKERS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the HACKERS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with HACKERS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OH-2012-02-16-34 | Monroe County - March 1974

    Relationships of soils in associations 1 and 6 to topography and underlying materials along the Ohio River (Soil Survey of Monroe County, Ohio; March 1974).

  2. WV-2012-03-23-06 | Pleasants and Tyler Counties - July 1989

    Typical relationship of soils, landscapes, and underlying parent materials in Otwell-Gallia-Hackers general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Pleasants and Tyler Counties, WV; 1989).

Map Units

Map units containing HACKERS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHcA8205373682t1l8oh00919811:15840
Hackers silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedHcB2085378022t1l9oh11119681:15840
Hackers silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedHcB18475365022t1l9oh16719731:15840
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHcA9335365012t1l8oh16719731:15840
Hackers silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopesHcC225536503l08koh16719731:15840
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHa745617342t1l8wv01720011:24000
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHa10675149052t1l8wv02119951:24000
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaA7395128482t1l8wv03919761:20000
Hackers silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaB3615128492t1l9wv03919761:20000
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHa2505148132t1l8wv04119891:20000
Hackers silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaB5255131692t1l9wv07919811:20000
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaA2135131682t1l8wv07919811:20000
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaA8285132912t1l8wv08519801:20000
Hackers silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaB5715132922t1l9wv08519801:20000
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaA154113841442t1l8wv60020051:24000
Hackers silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaB9613841452t1l9wv60020051:24000
Hackers silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedHcB10245145962t1l9wv60119661:15840
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHcA5805145952t1l8wv60119661:15840
Hackers loam, 3 to 10 percent slopesHaB191514593k8gswv60119661:15840
Hackers loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesHaA157514592k8grwv60119661:15840
Hackers silt loam, 10 to 20 percent slopesHcC101514597k8gxwv60119661:15840
Hackers loam, 10 to 20 percent slopesHaC92514594k8gtwv60119661:15840
Hackers silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopesHcD86514598k8gywv60119661:15840
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHa6685158172t1l8wv61019731:20000
Hackers silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaB16195147002t1l9wv61219841:20000
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHaA3545146992t1l8wv61219841:20000
Hackers silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely floodedHa25985151872t1l8wv62419931:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the HACKERS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .