Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GUMBLE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GUMBLE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GUMBLE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GUMBLE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GUMBLE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GUMBLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GUMBLE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GUMBLE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GUMBLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GUMBLE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GUMBLE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GUMBLE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Boondock-Chalco-Gumble complex, 8 to 30 percent slopes1860130219076342211lnv62819801:24000
Gumble loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes69074919076282211dnv62819801:24000
Gumble-Chalco complex 2 to 8 percent slopes69155019076292211fnv62819801:24000
Wieland-Gumble-Bilbo association265510540477206j0krnv76319861:24000
Gumble-Tuffo-Rock outcrop association18535433477133j0hdnv76319861:24000
Gumble-Chen association18544360477134j0hfnv76319861:24000
Gumble-Tuffo-Hunnton association18524150477132j0hcnv76319861:24000
Gumble-Puett variant-Xeric Torriorthents association18553180477135j0hgnv76319861:24000
Ninemile-Pequop-Gumble association16563115477089j0fznv76319861:24000
Gumble-Shalper-Izar association24012290474963hy7dnv76519861:24000
Wicup-Gochea-Gumble association40028210475010hy8xnv76519861:24000
Risley-Gumble complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes28435615490699jgm0or62819971:24000
Risley-Gumble-Torriorthents complex, 2 to 25 percent slopes28523045490700jgm1or62819971:24000
Gumble-Mahoon-Cagle complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes13614868490502jgdnor62819971:24000
Poall-Gumble complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes26211114490668jgl0or62819971:24000
Torriorthents-Gumble complex, 2 to 35 percent slopes3337244490760jgnzor62819971:24000
Drewsey-Torriorthents-Gumble complex, 2 to 40 percent slopes854153490962jgwhor62819971:24000
Gumble very stony loam, 20 to 40 percent south slopes1353314490501jgdmor62819971:24000
Gumble very gravelly silt loam, 2 to 20 percent slopes134735490500jgdlor62819971:24000
Poall-Risley-Gumble complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes70291703327222782sf3dor6451:24000
Gumble-Eusbio complex, 1 to 25 percent slopes5027219327222932sf3wor6451:24000
Tubmountain-Gumble complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes3814119524257262mf57or6451:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GUMBLE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .