Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRIGSBY soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRIGSBY, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRIGSBY were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
12585KY-013-00285KY-013-002Grigsby4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties36.7120247,-83.783226
n/a83P08971983KY099007Grigsby5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/a77KY-193-00577KY-193-005Grigsby4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/a83KY-099-00783KY-099-007Grigsby4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRIGSBY soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRIGSBY series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRIGSBY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRIGSBY series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRIGSBY share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRIGSBY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRIGSBY series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRIGSBY, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. KY-2010-09-03-11 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Highsplint-Cloverlick-Kimper general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  2. KY-2010-09-03-12 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Handshoe-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  3. KY-2010-09-03-13 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Kimper-Cloverlick-Renox-Highsplint general soil map unit in Letcher County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  4. KY-2010-09-03-14 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Alticrest-Varilla-Shelocta-Jefferson general soil map unit and the Cloverlick-Highsplint-Guyandotte-Shelocta general soil map unit in Letcher County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  5. KY-2010-09-03-15 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Dekalb general soil map unit in Letcher County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  6. KY-2010-09-03-16 | Knott and Letcher Counties - 2004

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Cloverlick-Fedscreek-Kimper general soil map unit in Knott County (Soil Survey of Knott and Letcher Counties, Kentucky; 2004).

  7. KY-2010-09-03-18 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topography in the Hazleton-Shelocta-Fiveblock and Grigsby-Shelocta-Orrville general soil map units. The Hazleton-Shelocta-Fiveblock general soil map unit is on the mountains and in the surface mined areas, and the Grigsby-Shelocta-Orrville general soil map unit is in the valleys (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

  8. KY-2010-09-03-19 | Lawrence and Martin Counties - 2005

    Typical pattern of soils, parent material, and topograhy in the Upshur-Vandalia-Rarden general soil map unit. This map unit is on the mountains (Soil Survey of Lawrence and Martin Counties, Kentucky; 2005).

  9. KY-2010-09-03-27 | Cumberland County - 1998

    Typical pattern of the soils in the Huntington-Elk-Nelse-Grigsby and Holston-Monongahela-Waynesboro general soil map units and the underlying material (Soil Survey of Cumberland County, Kentucky; 1998).

  10. KY-2010-09-03-30 | Estill and Lee Counties - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Grigsby-Nolin-Elk-Morehead general soil map unit in Estill County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).

  11. KY-2010-09-03-33 | Estill and Lee Counties - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Bledsoe-Gilpin general soil map unit in Estill County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).

  12. KY-2010-09-03-36 | Estill and Lee Counties - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin general soil map unit in Lee County (Soil Survey of Estill and Lee Counties, Kentucky; 2007).

  13. KY-2010-09-03-39 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Helechawa-Gilpin-Hazleton general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  14. KY-2010-09-03-40 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Pope-Helechawa-Gilpin general soil map unit in Magoffin County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  15. KY-2010-09-03-41 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Kimper-Shelocta-Fedscreek-Gilpin general soil map unit in Magoffin County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  16. KY-2010-09-03-42 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Latham-Marrowbone general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  17. KY-2010-09-03-46 | Magoffin and Morgan Counties - 2002

    Typical pattern of soils and their relationship to geology and topography in the Shelocta-Gilpin-Allegheny-Grigsby general soil map unit in Morgan County (Soil Survey of Magoffin and Morgan Counties, Kentucky; 2002).

  18. KY-2010-09-10-02 | Butler and Edmonson Counties -

    Relationship of soils to topography and underlying material in the Newark-Nolin-Melvin association (Soil Survey of Butler and Edmonson Counties, Kentucky).

  19. KY-2012-01-27-25 | Carter County - April 1983

    Pattern of soils, topography, and underlying material in the Rigley-Lily-Rock outcrop map unit (Soil Survey of Carter County, Kentucky; April 1983).

  20. KY-2012-01-27-46 | Clinton County - May 1994

    Pattern of soils and parent material in the Waynesboro-Nolin-Grigsby general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Clinton County, Kentucky; May 1994).

  21. KY-2012-01-30-20 | Hart County - May 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Nolichucky-Canmer general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Hart County, Kentucky; May 1993).

  22. KY-2012-01-30-22 | Hart County - May 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Riney-Sonora-Canmer general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Hart County, Kentucky; May 1993).

  23. KY-2012-01-31-14 | Jackson and Owsley Counties - April 1989

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Shelocta-Bledsoe-Gilpin map unit (Soil Survey of Jackson and Owsley Counties, Kentucky; April 1989).

  24. KY-2012-02-01-38 | Pike County - June 1990

    Along the major tributaries in Pike County, the soils on the mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb general soil map unit and those in the valleys are in the Yeager-Grigsby-Potomac-Hayter map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

  25. KY-2012-02-01-39 | Pike County - June 1990

    Along Elkhorn Creek and Pine Mountain, the upper faulted mountains are in the Kimper-Sharondale-Berks-Shelocta general soil map unit, the lower mountains are in the Marrowbone-Fedscreek-Kimper-Dekalb map unit, and the valley is in the Yeager-Grigsby-Potomac-Hayter map unit (Soil Survey of Pike County, Kentucky; June 1990).

  26. KY-2012-02-01-40 | Powell and Wolfe Counties - September 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Jessietown-Muse-Rohan general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Powell and Wolfe Counties, Kentucky; September 1993).

  27. KY-2012-02-01-43 | Powell and Wolfe Counties - September 1993

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Grigsby-Allegheny-Knowlton general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Powell and Wolfe Counties, Kentucky; September 1993).

  28. VA-2010-11-05-31 | Russell County - 2007

    Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

  29. VA-2010-11-05-32 | Russell County - 2007

    Diagram of a sequence of landform positions along the Clinch River in areas underlain with limestone and shale in Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

  30. VA-2012-05-11-11 | Russell County - 2007

    Diagram of a sequence of landform positions in the Appalachian Plateau area of Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

  31. VA-2012-05-11-12 | Russell County - 2007

    Diagram of a sequence of landform positions along the Clinch River in areas underlain with limestone and shale in Russell County. The soils named on the land surface are shown in their natural relationship to each other and in their relationship to landform position (Soil Survey of Russell County, Virginia; 2007).

  32. WV-2010-11-08-10 | Lincoln County - 2007

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in an area of the Highsplint-Matewan-Cloverlick general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Lincoln County, West Virginia; 2007).

Map Units

Map units containing GRIGSBY as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, frequently floodedGrA83017274601vzkjky01120061:12000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodeduGrig912227382802tqhrky02519911:24000
Chagrin-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduChgB289727382792qdm8ky02519911:24000
Rowdy-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduRgrB174927382812ncv6ky02519911:24000
Udorthents-Urban land-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduUdrB149327382842mff7ky02519911:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loamGr1881550242lgkrky04319801:20000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, protectedGr286551421lhssky05319901:20000
Grigsby fine sandy loamGr1035551451lhtrky05719911:20000
Shelocta-Grigsby-Orrville complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesSoC414518846632184lky06320071:12000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, frequently floodedGw1013188465421849ky06320071:12000
Grigsby-Skidmore complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, frequently floodedGzB470188465021845ky06320071:12000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, frequently floodeduGrfA50705491882z8yxky10119641:15840
Kickapoo fine sandy loam (grigsby)Kp27013978801hxlxky15119681:20000
Nolin variant, fine sandy loam (grigsby)Nv690549913lg74ky17119771:20000
Anthroportic Udorthents-Urban land-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduAdrB519530256952x5j3ky19519861:24000
Grigsby-Yeager complex, occasionally floodedGy2309550033lgc0ky19519861:24000
Grigsby sandy loam, frequently floodedGr609553861llbhky22720041:12000
Huntington fine sandy loam (grigsby 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded)Hn230552038ljfpky60319681:15840
Chagrin-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduChgB385727382522qdm8ky61620041:24000
Grigsby-Chavies-Yeager complex, 2 to 55 percent slopes, frequently floodedGyF3207557770lqdlky61620041:24000
Grigsby sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally floodedGu1477557767lqdhky61620041:24000
Grigsby-Rowdy complex, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally floodedGvB1396557769lqdkky61620041:24000
Nolin variant fine sandy loam (grigsby)Nv1350551057lhf1ky62119751:20000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodedGs44145507072tqhrky62319851:20000
Grigsby-Orrville variant complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodedGv2891550708lh1sky62319851:20000
Udorthents-Urban land-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduUdrB917227382632mff7ky62619971:24000
Rowdy-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduRgrB440127382602ncv6ky62619971:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodeduGrig367627382582tqhrky62619971:24000
Allegheny-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally flooded20902612218nk1zky63019661:15840
Udorthents-Urban land-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduUdrB575527382732mff7ky63319791:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodeduGrig359827382682tqhrky63319791:24000
Rowdy-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduRgrB65427382702ncv6ky63319791:24000
Grigsby silt loam, frequently floodedGs7859550831lh5rky63419891:20000
Grigsby-Orrville complex, frequently floodedGu4741550832lh5sky63419891:20000
Rowdy-Grigsby complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodeduRgrB307627382562ncv6ky63419891:20000
Grigsby-Skidmore-Morehead complex, 0 to 4 percent slopesGy2329550833lh5tky63419891:20000
Shelocta-Grigsby-Stokly complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesShC11774550881lh7cky63919911:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodedGr68185508672tqhrky63919911:24000
Potomac-Shelocta-Grigsby complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesPsC4387550876lh76ky63919911:24000
Shelocta-Grigsby-Orrville complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesSgC11633550914lh8fky64019961:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodedGr34215509042tqhrky64019961:24000
Hayter-Grigsby complex, 2 to 15 percent slopesHaC2353550905lh84ky64019961:24000
Grigsby sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally floodedGr11022550938lh96ky64119941:24000
Rowdy-Grigsby-Barbourville complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesRyB4834550956lh9sky64119941:24000
Orrville-Grigsby complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodedOy1676550949lh9kky64119941:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, occasionally floodedGr300224530752nbmgky64719891:20000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, frequently floodedGg17423791882kvr0ky64820091:12000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, pondedGp1524530382nbl8ky64820091:12000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, frequently floodedGr320524528712nbdwky70919951:20000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded10A51416708262tqhtva02720061:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded9A123223998652tqhtva05120081:24000
Grigsby sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded27A134816711401t2yrva16720061:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded30A158525085532tqhtva19520101:24000
Grigsby fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently floodedGs22965533372tqhrwv04320051:24000
Grigsby loam, occasionally floodedGt44614125992tqhswv04320051:24000
Grigsby loam, occasionally floodedGw54705150172tqhswv09919931:24000
Grigsby loam, occasionally floodedGw269511555432tqhswv62020051:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRIGSBY soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .