Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GREENDALE soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GREENDALE, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GREENDALE were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
116A60ID351960AR06335Greendale3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.8267,-91.7746
12240A49781954TN031015Greendale3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties35.5263901,-85.9538879
n/a40A49771954TN031005Greendale3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GREENDALE soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GREENDALE series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GREENDALE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GREENDALE series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GREENDALE share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GREENDALE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GREENDALE series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GREENDALE, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. OK-2012-02-16-01 | Adair County - September 1965

    Soils in the Bodine-Dickson soil association and their general location in the landscape (Soil Survey of Adair County, Oklahoma; September 1965).

  2. TN-2012-03-19-15 | Loudon County - June 1961

    Diagram showing distribution and pattern of soils in area 1 (Soil Survey of Loudon County, TN; 1961).

  3. TN-2012-03-19-18 | Maury County - October 1959

    Sketch showing relative positions of soils in the Mountview-Dickson and the Bodine-Mountview (shallow phases)-Pace assciations (Soil Survey of Maury County, TN; 1959).

  4. TN-2012-03-19-38 | Williamson County - August 1964

    Major and minor soils and underlying parent materials in the Mountview-Baxter-Bodine association (Soil Survey of Williamson County, TN; 1964).

Map Units

Map units containing GREENDALE as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Greendale cherty silt loamGa1000329154c1hwal04919531:20000
Greendale cherty silt loam, undulating phaseGcu3592522890kk3fal07119431:24000
Greendale cherty silt loam, level phaseGcv553522891kk3gal07119431:24000
Greendale cherty silt loam, eroded, rolling phaseGcn264522889kk3dal07119431:24000
Greendale cherty silt loam, eroded, undulating phaseGce166522888kk3cal07119431:24000
Greendale cherty silt loam undulating phaseGcu3497522778kjztal08319531:20000
Greendale cherty silt loamGr3582523131kkc6al08919581:24000
Greendale silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely floodedGb24175269112t3gdtn01119511:20000
Greendale cherty silt loamGa1438526910kp93tn01119511:20000
Greendale silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopesGr13005245182t3gctn02519481:24000
Greendale silt loamGc5118524907km6htn03119561:20000
Greendale cherty silt loamGb738524906km6gtn03119561:20000
Ennis silt loamEn485527059kpfxtn04119681:15840
Greendale silt loamGb2480527202kpljtn05119501:20000
Greendale cherty silt loamGa1037527201kplhtn05119501:20000
Greendale cherty silt loamGr2076527317kpq7tn05519651:15840
Greendale silt loamGs779527318kpq8tn05519651:15840
Greendale silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely floodedGa108025251252t3gdtn05919541:15840
Greendale silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes311405252922t3gctn06320071:24000
Greendale cherty silt loam, undulating phaseGa10438527522kpxvtn08319521:20000
Greendale cherty silt loamGa16327527644kq1stn09919551:20000
Greendale silt loamGb4504527645kq1ttn09919551:20000
Greendale silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodedGe23085259582t3gftn10519581:15840
Greendale cherty silt loamGc936525957kn9ctn10519581:15840
Greendale silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodedGb8575262672t3gftn11519511:20000
Greendale silt loamGb341527782kq67tn11919551:20000
Greendale silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely floodedGr9105278962t3gdtn12319741:20000
Greendale silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopesGrn7375299732t3gctn17319451:24000
Greendale silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely floodedGnB960416896562t3gdtn17919551:15840
Greendale cherty silt loam, 2 to 12 percent slopesGrC5530523507kkrbtn18719611:15840
Greendale silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopesGsB1019523508kkrctn18719611:15840
Greendale silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodedGr23915285602t3gftn60219731:15840
Greendale silt loamGr405528652kr39tn60419741:20000
Greendale silt loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, occasionally floodedGa247218995022t3gftn60919551:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GREENDALE soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .