Soil Data Explorer - GREENBUSH

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GREENBUSH soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GREENBUSH, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GREENBUSH were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
105	78IL085007	S1978IL085007	Greenbush	1	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	42.5002389,-89.9461844

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GREENBUSH soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GREENBUSH series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GREENBUSH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GREENBUSH series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GREENBUSH share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GREENBUSH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GREENBUSH series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GREENBUSH, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. IL-2010-09-01-18 | Fulton County - 2003

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Rozetta-Keomah-Clarksdale association (Soil Survey of Fulton County, Illinois; 2003).

Map Units

Map units containing GREENBUSH as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	1378	2378656	2w6rj	il001	1997	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	17	2378657	2w6rl	il001	1997	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	436	1407191	2w6rg	il007	2006	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	405	1407192	2w6rj	il007	2006	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	53	2604193	2w6rj	il009	1984	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	10524	1862776	2w6rj	il011	2007	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	2474	1862775	2w6rg	il011	2007	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	1355	1862777	2w6rl	il011	2007	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	4548	849337	2w6rj	il015	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	4031	849348	2w6rl	il015	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes	675C	3963	849340	2w6rk	il015	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	56	849334	2w6rg	il015	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	3998	261775	2w6rj	il021	1999	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	10247	615673	2w6rj	il057	1997	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	8326	2542251	2w6rl	il061	1968	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	7165	211761	2w6rj	il061	1968	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	9085	175193	2w6rj	il067	1993	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	2023	632706	2w6rj	il071	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	901	1480521	2w6rg	il071	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	660	1398435	2w6rl	il071	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	22887	244815	2w6rl	il073	2001	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	15754	244814	2w6rj	il073	2001	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	1943	244813	2w6rg	il073	2001	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	4300	728488	2w6rj	il083	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	300	728489	2w6rl	il083	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	11831	1949650	2w6rj	il085	1990	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	8527	1949651	2w6rl	il085	1990	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	12819	680984	2w6rj	il095	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, terrace, 2 to 5 percent slopes	9675B	597	680985	qvm8	il095	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	662	1386808	2w6rj	il099	2006	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	400	1386809	2w6rl	il099	2006	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	4786	937031	2w6rj	il103	2004	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	5656	637261	2w6rj	il109	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	325	1913965	2w6rj	il115	2007	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	24	2650868	2w6rj	il123	1997	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	1485	1406561	2w6rj	il129	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	10081	245002	2w6rl	il131	2000	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	9946	245001	2w6rj	il131	2000	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	14339	1398939	2w6rj	il141	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	715	1398938	2w6rg	il141	2005	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	3758	208987	2w6rj	il143	1986	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	835	172811	2w6rj	il155	1987	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	5654	198712	2w6rj	il161	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	2214	198732	2w6rg	il161	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	1200	202220	2w6rj	il169	2000	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	2502	179101	2w6rl	il175	1992	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	2358	179100	2w6rj	il175	1992	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	14360	1592021	2w6rj	il177	2006	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes	675C	7161	1651466	2w6rk	il177	2006	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	4587	1592023	2w6rl	il177	2006	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	636	1592020	2w6rg	il177	2006	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	2535	2507904	2w6rj	il179	1991	1:15840
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	6454	244919	2w6rj	il187	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	2022	244920	2w6rl	il187	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, terrace, 2 to 5 percent slopes	9675B	104	634619	p9cl	il187	2002	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	13486	793671	2w6rj	il195	2003	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded	675C2	4688	793675	2w6rl	il195	2003	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes	675B	9186	1473196	2w6rj	il201	1997	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	675A	1539	1473195	2w6rg	il201	1997	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, terrace, 0 to 2 percent slopes	9675A	143	1474065	1lgwh	il201	1997	1:12000
Greenbush silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes	Xu	66	398401	fckn	mn059	1956	1:20000
Greenbush silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	X	53	398400	fckm	mn059	1956	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GREENBUSH soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).