Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRANTFORK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRANTFORK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRANTFORK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
11385IL1210291985IL121029Grantfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.6034611,-89.0172583
11389IL1890291989IL189029Grantfork3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.5022972,-89.1542528
11386P051885IL121060Grantfork7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.6819458,-88.9508362
11390P000789IL025022Grantfork5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.666111,-88.4483337
11390P000989IL025033Grantfork6Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.6919441,-88.3766632
114B78IL1570321978IL157032Grantfork3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.1504847,-89.6061454
114B78IL1570521978IL157052Grantfork3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.2114504,-89.6382854
114B79IL1190151979IL119015Grantfork3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9902336,-89.6551951
114B79IL1190181979IL119018Grantfork3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties38.9301649,-89.7830964
n/a83IL1210271983IL121027Grantfork2Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a
n/a84IL1210071984IL121007Grantfork3Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Propertiesn/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRANTFORK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRANTFORK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRANTFORK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRANTFORK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRANTFORK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRANTFORK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRANTFORK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRANTFORK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. IL-2010-09-01-79 | Washington County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Oconee-Darmstadt-Coulterville association (Soil Survey of Washington County, Illinois; 1998).

  2. IL-2011-08-05-04 | Washington County - 1998

    Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Oconee-Darmstadt-Coulterville association (Soil Survey of Washington County, Illinois; 1998).

Map Units

Map units containing GRANTFORK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Atlas-Grantfork silty clay loams, 4 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded914C311771738885ty9il00519811:12000
Blair-Grantfork complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded934C21545210919928sspil02519931:12000
Blair-Grantfork complex, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded934C252851746885vs3il02719921:15840
Blair-Grantfork complex, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded934B25551746875vs2il02719921:15840
Grantfork silty clay loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded584B218351734615thjil04919861:15840
Atlas-Grantfork silty clay loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded914C3111992526pbhil11719991:12000
Coulterville-Grantfork silty clay loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded878C342381989736p1hil11920011:12000
Atlas-Grantfork silty clay loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded914C322141989796p1pil11920011:12000
Atlas-Grantfork silty clay loams, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded914D311411989786p1nil11920011:12000
Passport-Grantfork silt loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded888C274062027369261n0il12120081:12000
Atlas-Grantfork silt loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded914C252052027370261n1il12120081:12000
Coulterville-Grantfork silty clay loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded878C34418414765m7il13319981:12000
Blair-Grantfork silt loams, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded934D313012005406qp1il15720011:12000
Coulterville-Grantfork silty clay loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded878C3906518316764lmil16319971:12000
Coulterville-Grantfork silty clay loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, severely eroded878C3257715425031ns35il18920061:12000
Coulterville-Grantfork silt loams, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded878C2123516004961qqfxil18920061:12000
Blair-Grantfork silt loams, 10 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded934D343715289751nb0sil18920061:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRANTFORK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .