Soil Data Explorer - GRANT

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRANT soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRANT, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRANT were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-18). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
80A	40A4708	56OK017001	Grant	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	35.4636116,-97.707222
80A	87P0443	87OK051001	Grant	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	35.0880547,-97.7872238
80A	87P0445	87OK051002	Grant	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	35.0819435,-97.7922211
80A	40A1818	S1976KS077003	GRANT	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	37.0955544,-98.0561142

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRANT soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRANT series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-10-24), parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRANT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRANT series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRANT share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2024-10-23) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRANT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2024-10-23).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRANT series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2024-10-23).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRANT, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2024-10-23).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. OK-2012-02-16-04 | Blaine County - February 1968

   Typical pattern of soils in associations 1, 3, 4, and 6 (Soil Survey of Blaine County, Oklahoma; February 1968).

2. OK-2012-02-16-05 | Blaine County - February 1968

   Typical pattern of soils in associations 7 and 8 (Soil Survey of Blaine County, Oklahoma; February 1968).

3. OK-2012-02-16-12 | Cleveland County - April 1987

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Renfrow-Grainola-Grant map unit and the Port-Weswood map unit (Soil Survey of Cleveland County, Oklahoma; April 1987).

4. OK-2012-02-16-32 | Garfield County - October 1967

   Typical pattern of soils in the Grant-Pond Creek association, and Port, Reinach, and Pulaski soils of soil association 2 on the bordering flood plains (Soil Survey of Garfield County, Oklahoma; October 1967).

5. OK-2012-02-17-11 | Major County - October 1968

   Soil associations in the eastern part of the county (Soil Survey of Major County, Oklahoma; October 1968).

Map Units

Map units containing GRANT as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	6341	38123	1382486	2td5w	ks007	1973	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	6342	15396	1382487	2s7gb	ks007	1973	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes	6340	1578	1382485	1hdl9	ks007	1973	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	6341	192	1381260	1hc9s	ks033	1987	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	6341	44581	1382693	2td5w	ks077	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	6342	6083	1382694	2s7gb	ks077	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes	6340	5693	1382692	1hdsz	ks077	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	6342	9	1444650	2s7gb	ks191	1974	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes	6340	7	1444649	1kh8l	ks191	1974	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GrB	45897	381426	2td5w	ok003	1971	1:24000
Grant-Nash complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	GtD2	19827	381429	dsx5	ok003	1971	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	GrC	15484	381427	2s7gb	ok003	1971	1:24000
Grant-Port, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	GuE	10113	381430	2tq64	ok003	1971	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	GrC2	9919	381428	2s7g3	ok003	1971	1:24000
Wisby-Grant complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes	AgC	2417	381405	dswd	ok003	1971	1:24000
Wisby-Grant complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	AgD2	1805	381407	dswg	ok003	1971	1:24000
Wisby-Grant complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	AgC2	1369	381406	dswf	ok003	1971	1:24000
Grainola, Ashport frequently flooded, and Grant soils, 0 to 20 percent slopes	GAGF	56	622379	nwmr	ok003	1971	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	GrC	16063	381726	2s7gb	ok011	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GrB	8106	381725	2td5w	ok011	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	GrD	3524	381727	dt6s	ok011	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	GrD2	2867	381728	2s7g5	ok011	1965	1:24000
Kingfisher-Grant complex, 3 to 5 percent slopes	KgC	1023	381731	dt6x	ok011	1965	1:24000
Grant loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	GrC	20560	381889	2tq5k	ok015	1967	1:24000
Binger and Grant soils, 3 to 8 percent slopes, severely eroded	CrD3	16531	381875	2yhdk	ok015	1967	1:24000
Grant loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GrB	15922	381888	dtcz	ok015	1967	1:24000
Grant-Port, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	Bk	9334	381870	2tq64	ok015	1967	1:24000
Grant loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	GrC2	5502	381890	dtd1	ok015	1967	1:24000
Grant loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes	GrD	2900	381891	dtd2	ok015	1967	1:24000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	GwC	2662	381892	2tq5q	ok015	1967	1:24000
Grant-Port, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	GpE	23719	381948	2tq64	ok017	1972	1:24000
Grant-Pawhuska complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GhB	6571	381947	dtfw	ok017	1972	1:24000
Grant-Ironmound complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes	GuD	6017	381949	dtfy	ok017	1972	1:24000
Grant-Ironmound complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	GuD2	2400	381950	dtfz	ok017	1972	1:24000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	84	5739	382149	2tq5q	ok027	1984	1:24000
Grant-Urban land-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	88	317	382152	dtnh	ok027	1984	1:24000
Grant loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	GrC	7802	382325	2tq5k	ok039	1973	1:24000
Grant loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GrB	5428	382324	dtv1	ok039	1973	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes, shallow	GaB	38475	382490	dv0d	ok047	1965	1:24000
Grainola, Ashport frequently flooded, and Grant soils, 0 to 20 percent slopes	Bk	32237	382484	dv06	ok047	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	GaC2	24683	382492	2s7g3	ok047	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	KfB	7165	382497	2td5w	ok047	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	GaC	2076	382491	2s7gb	ok047	1965	1:24000
Grant-Yahola, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	GrYE	28	393658	f6mn	ok047	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	14	34645	382632	2s7g3	ok051	1975	1:24000
Grant-Port, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	15	18000	382633	2tq64	ok051	1975	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	12	9039	382630	2td5w	ok051	1975	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	13	8074	382631	2s7gb	ok051	1975	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	17	10880	382704	2td5w	ok053	1983	1:24000
Grant-Port, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	22	8922	382710	2tq64	ok053	1983	1:24000
Oscarsaline, occasionally flooded-Grant complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	38	5039	382727	dv81	ok053	1983	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	19	4196	382706	2s7g3	ok053	1983	1:24000
Grant-Kingfisher complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	21	3747	382709	dv7g	ok053	1983	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	18	3483	382705	2s7gb	ok053	1983	1:24000
Grant-Kingfisher complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes	20	1654	382708	dv7f	ok053	1983	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GrtB	22	623470	2td5w	ok071	1965	1:24000
Grant-Kingfisher complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	GrKD2	8	623469	nxrx	ok071	1965	1:24000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	GrHC	29	383621	2tq5q	ok083	1994	1:12000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	14	37251	383769	2s7g3	ok087	1976	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	16	12754	383771	2s7g5	ok087	1976	1:24000
Grant-Port, frequently flooded, complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	17	12615	383772	2tq64	ok087	1976	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	15	6914	383770	2s7gb	ok087	1976	1:24000
Gullied land-Grant complex, 3 to 8 percent slopes	18	6646	383773	dwbs	ok087	1976	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	13	3017	383768	2td5w	ok087	1976	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GrB	12826	383831	2td5w	ok093	1965	1:24000
Grant-Yahola complex, 0 to 12 percent slopes	Bk	10763	383813	dwd2	ok093	1965	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	GrC	4277	383832	2s7gb	ok093	1965	1:24000
Grant-Nash complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes, eroded	GnD2	3671	383830	dwdm	ok093	1965	1:24000
Grant-Nash complex, 5 to 8 percent slopes	GnD	420	383829	dwdl	ok093	1965	1:24000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	GrHC	10515	384057	2tq5q	ok103	1994	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GrtB	1853	384062	2td5w	ok103	1994	1:24000
Grant loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	GrnC	961	384061	2tq5k	ok103	1994	1:24000
Grant-Huska complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes	GrHC	214	384296	2tq5q	ok109	1996	1:12000
Grant silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes	GrtB	20032	385193	2td5w	ok151	1995	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes, eroded	GrtC2	3290	385195	2s7g3	ok151	1995	1:24000
Grant silt loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes	GrtC	2537	385194	2s7gb	ok151	1995	1:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRANT soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2024-10-30).