Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRANDAD soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRANDAD, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRANDAD were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
43A96P002795ID035010Grandad7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties46.9236107,-115.9816666

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRANDAD soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRANDAD series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRANDAD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRANDAD series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRANDAD share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRANDAD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRANDAD series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRANDAD, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GRANDAD as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Poorman-Grandad, dry complex, 35 to 65 percent slopesPo56009644770pmy1id05720131:24000
Rettig-Grandad-Nakarna complex, 30 to 65 percent slopesGr72813644889pn1wid05720131:24000
Poorman-Grandad, dry complex, 10 to 35 percent slopesPo4j18312501985v2x3id05720131:24000
Township-Grandad, dry complex, 20 to 50 percent slopesTg21623645292pngwid05720131:24000
Grandad, dry-Grandad complex, 35 to 60 percent slopesGr5j16022501182v25vid05720131:24000
Poorman-Grandad complex, 35 to 75 percent slopesBd212486826212w5t2id05720131:24000
Scand-Grandad complex, 10 to 40 percent slopesGs11223644674pmtyid05720131:24000
Grandad, dry-Grandad complex, 10 to 35 percent slopesGr41216644672pmtwid05720131:24000
Scaler-Grandad complex, 35 to 60 percent slopesSc5j9152501988v2xpid05720131:24000
Grandad-Scand complex, 35 to 65 percent slopesGs4j5622497623v25xid05720131:24000
Rettig-Grandad complex, 35 to 70 percent slopesNt1j252501983v2wtid05720131:24000
Grandad, dry-Grandad complex, 35 to 60 percent slopesGr5132663016v25vid60819941:24000
Nakarna-Grandad-Humic Udivitrands families, complex, mica schist, lower sideslopes toeslopes and stream bottoms of drainages in rolling uplands, south aspects2lgqx429368112lgqxid60819941:24000
Rettig-Grandad complex, 35 to 70 percent slopes19713941777350v2wtid61220031:24000
Poorman-Grandad complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes18710540775569v11cid61220031:24000
Poorman-Grandad complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes18892977755742w5t2id61220031:24000
Grandad, dry-Grandad complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes915905776669v25vid61220031:24000
Odonnell-Grandad complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes1805426777352v2wwid61220031:24000
Grandad, dry-Grandad complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes904958776668v25tid61220031:24000
Grandad-Rettig complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes924931775582v11sid61220031:24000
Grandad ashy silt loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes892961776663v25nid61220031:24000
Grandad-Rettig complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes932540776656v25fid61220031:24000
Poorman-Grandad, dry complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes1902287777360v2x4id61220031:24000
Scaler-Grandad complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes204233777377v2xpid61220031:24000
Poorman-Grandad, dry complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes189182777359v2x3id61220031:24000
Grandad-Scand complex, 35 to 65 percent slopes94164776671v25xid61220031:24000
Nakarna-Grandad-Humic Udivitrands families, complex, mica schist, lower sideslopes toeslopes and stream bottoms of drainages within rolling uplands, north aspects718229023974452lgqyid6701:24000
Nakarna-Grandad families, complex, weathered mica schists, dissected rolling uplands with mass wasted inclusions, north aspects761210223974692lgrqid6701:24000
Nakarna-Grandad-Humic Udivitrands families, complex, mica schist, lower sideslopes toeslopes and stream bottoms of drainages in rolling uplands, south aspects71799723974442lgqxid6701:24000
Grandad-Rettig families, complex, weathered mica schists, dissected rolling uplands with mass wasted inclusions, south aspects75781523974592lgrdid6701:24000
Rettig-Hugus-Grandad families, complex, moderately weathered mica schist geology, mountain ridges and upper sideslopes, north aspects7908723974892lgscid6701:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRANDAD soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .