Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRALIC soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRALIC, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRALIC were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRALIC soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRALIC series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRALIC series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRALIC series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRALIC share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRALIC series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRALIC series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRALIC, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GRALIC as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Gralic-Supervisor families complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes.2171009470532hsmgca70319831:24000
Gralic-supervisor families complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes.216995470531hsmfca70319831:24000
Gralic-Loberg families-Rubble land association, 35 to 80 percent slopes.215558470530hsmdca70319831:24000
Gralic-Grenadier families complex, 15 to 50 percent slopes2022850510584k49gco67619831:24000
Kingmine-Gralic families, complex, 40 to 65 percent slopes9766131732802wv33id71220081:24000
Gralic-Kingmine families, complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes993631732812wv3jid71220081:24000
Gralic, very stony surface-Kingmine-Sponsor families, complex, 25 to 55 percent slopes8741994727334862slsdid7131:24000
Jumpstart-Gralic family-Poodle family, complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes907522627335132slt9id7131:24000
Gralic-Sambrito families, complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes873480227334852slsbid7131:24000
Gralic-Broad Canyon families, complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes876214127334872slsfid7131:24000
Kingmine-Gralic families, complex, 40 to 65 percent slopes976181529638772wv33id7131:24000
Gralic, extremely stony surface-Sambrito families, complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes908140827335152sltcid7131:24000
Winnemucca-Gralic family, complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes89877827334982slssid7131:24000
Gralic family-Broad Canyon complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes200567229808672x00yid7131:24000
Gralic-Kingmine families, complex, 15 to 40 percent slopes99329429638892wv3jid7131:24000
Gralic, very stony surface-Kingmine-Sponsor families, complex, 25 to 55 percent slopes874121931634452slsdid7161:24000
Gralic-Sambrito families, complex, 15 to 60 percent slopes87319031634442slsbid7161:24000
Gralic-Broad Canyon families, complex, 12 to 30 percent slopes87613131634462slsfid7161:24000
Jumpstart-Gralic family-Poodle family, complex, 5 to 30 percent slopes9075231733992slt9id7161:24000
Gralic-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 75 percent slopes3631223644060pm64nv77319811:24000
Gralic-Rock outcrop complex, 8 to 50 percent slopes362625644059pm63nv77319811:24000
Gralic-Merino-Hobacker families complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes46331288230gwwut6451:24000
Skaggs-Gralic families complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes8A331486930hlzut6451:24000
Hobacker-Gralic families-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 80 percent slopes8331487030hm0ut6451:24000
Rock outcrop-Dollarhide family, rubbly-Gralic family complex, 30 to 70 percent slopes6413273512414k66hut6461:24000
Gralic family, 15 to 70 percent slopes568497512397k65yut6461:24000
Geohrock family, moist, extremely stony-Gralic family, dry association, 30 to 70 percent slopes626518512416k66kut6461:24000
Gralic, very stony surface-Kingmine-Sponsor families, complex, 25 to 55 percent slopes87423030834642slsdwy62319711:20000
Winnemucca-Gralic family, complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes89811730834702slsswy62319711:20000
Washboard-Gralic families, complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes -- draft35516995152017535swy66320121:24000
Enentah-Gralic families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes33311757152009535jwy66320121:24000
Washboard-Gralic families, complex, 20 to 60 percent slopes -- draft3553352611986535swy7231:24000
Enentah-Gralic families, complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes33302925208535jwy7231:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRALIC soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .