Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GRAHAM soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GRAHAM, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GRAHAM were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
3840A1147S1977AZ009002Graham5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties32.9334373,-109.5884323
4186P083285AZ003087Graham1Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties31.6922226,-109.9944458
4169C0168S1969AZ003022Graham7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties31.9500008,-109.4458313
4169C0172S1969AZ003026Graham7Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties31.9602776,-109.4502792

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GRAHAM soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GRAHAM series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRAHAM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRAHAM series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GRAHAM share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GRAHAM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GRAHAM series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GRAHAM, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

  1. NM-2012-02-14-05 | Hidalgo County - December 1973

    Diagram showing relationship of several soil associations and the topography in Hidalgo County (Soil Survey of Hidalgo County, New Mexico; December 1973).

Map Units

Map units containing GRAHAM as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Graham-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes551737015079181mm3jaz62720051:24000
Graham-Arivaca complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes54992215079171mm3haz62720051:24000
Rimrock-Graham complex, 3 to 15 percent slopesRn17854529161s1zaz63719681:31680
Graham soils, 8 to 45 percent slopesGsE13407528551s00az63719681:31680
Graham-Rimrock complex, 0 to 8 percent slopesGrB2301528581s03az63719681:31680
Graham very stony clay loam, 5 to 35 percent slopes4342044582541ym5az63920121:24000
Graham and House Mountain soils, 0 to 30 percent slopesGhD1071515274461n8fgaz64319671:31680
Graham and House Mountain soils, 30 to 60 percent slopesGhF753715274471n8fhaz64319671:31680
Graham extremely rocky clay loam, 2 to 40 percent slopesGuE3760536231sssaz66219661:20000
Limpia-Graham-Rock outcrop complex, 9 to 50 percent slopes23142535544461tnbaz66319791:24000
Rock outcrop-Atascosa-Graham complex, 9 to 70 percent slopes3194170544551tnmaz66319791:24000
Atascosa-Graham-Rock outcrop complex5105873536891svxaz66419751:24000
Graham-Rock outcrop complex2566202536661sv5az66419751:24000
Graham-Lampshire-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes451250017273271vzf7az66620071:24000
Lampshire-Graham-Rock outcrop association, steepLgF8887314261091jvzjaz66719711:20000
Graham soils, 5 to 20 percent slopesGhD1112814253091jv4qaz66719711:20000
Graham soils, 20 to 50 percent slopesGhF558614253861jv76az66719711:20000
Graham-Pantak complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes3113300538081szraz66919931:24000
Graham-Pantak-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes3212880538101sztaz66919931:24000
Graham-Lampshire complex, 8 to 60 percent slopes7513475550331v88az67120001:24000
Graham-Paramore-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 50 percent slopes24776724985542pznnaz6731:24000
Graham-Lampshire-Rock outcrop complex, 5 to 60 percent slopes23645624985592pzntaz6731:24000
Graham-Arivaca complex, 2 to 15 percent slopes452272798379vss5az69720051:24000
Graham-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 40 percent slopes46639798380vss6az69720051:24000
Graham extremely rocky clay loam, 10 to 45 percent slopesGT17840570151xb6nm02319671:31680
Graham rocky clay loam, 1 to 9 percent slopesGO13151570141xb5nm02319671:31680
Graham extremely rocky clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopesGr8754570201xbcnm02319671:31680
Graham cobbly clay loam, 10 to 25 percent slopesGR6435560241w97nm02919671:24000
Rock outcrop-Graham association, 5 to 25 percent slopes5119683593212vsrvnm66219791:48000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GRAHAM soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .