Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GOODTACK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GOODTACK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GOODTACK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GOODTACK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GOODTACK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOODTACK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOODTACK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GOODTACK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOODTACK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOODTACK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GOODTACK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing GOODTACK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Goodtack ashy fine sandy loam, low precipitation, 1 to 5 percent slopes764B1500234320922kp3hor6181:24000
Goodtack ashy very fine sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes762B662834376182kp3gor6181:24000
Goodtack-Borobey complex, 1 to 5 percent slopesBL128436434349002kp46or6181:24000
Borobey-Goodtack-Vergas complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes184405934349032l9ycor6181:24000
Goodtack ashy very fine sandy loam, low precipitation, 1 to 5 percent slopes1763623016722911t44wor62019921:24000
Goodtack ashy very fine sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes1751294016722901t44vor62019921:24000
Goodtack-Sliptrack complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes178180016722931t44yor62019921:24000
Moonbeam-Goodtack complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes187140016723041t459or62019921:24000
Goodtack-Borobey complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes17719016722921t44xor62019921:24000
Moonbeam-Goodtack complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes374100016694481t165or62819971:24000
Goodtack ashy very fine sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes3385179316898461tqf5or63520061:24000
Moonbeam-Goodtack complex, 1 to 10 percent slopes4623220616899641tqjzor63520061:24000
Goodtack ashy very fine sandy loam, low precipitation, 1 to 5 percent slopes3391459416898471tqf6or63520061:24000
Senra-Goodtack complex, 2 to 20 percent slopes5811231116900811tqnror63520061:24000
Moonbeam-Goodtack complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes463786316899651tqk0or63520061:24000
Goodtack-Borobey complex, 0 to 10 percent slopes340601016898481tqf7or63520061:24000
Senra-Goodtack complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes580224716900801tqnqor63520061:24000
Goodtack-Borobey complex, 1 to 5 percent slopes341205816898491tqf8or63520061:24000
Goodtack-Morehouse complex, 1 to 15 percent slopes342141716898501tqf9or63520061:24000
Goodtack-Sliptrack complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes34354916898511tqfbor63520061:24000
Senra-Goodtack-Suckerflat complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes58244416900821tqnsor63520061:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GOODTACK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .