Soil Data Explorer - GOODMAN

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the GOODMAN soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of GOODMAN, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to GOODMAN were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
90A	79P0393	79WI085007	Goodman	7	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.6138878,-89.1086121
90A	85P0250	84WI075005	Goodman	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.7133331,-88.336113
90A	90P0904	S1990WI041008	GOODMAN	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.4669456,-88.5858307
90A	90P0905	S1990WI041009	GOODMAN	6	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	45.4669456,-88.5858307

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the GOODMAN soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the GOODMAN series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOODMAN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOODMAN series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with GOODMAN share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the GOODMAN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the GOODMAN series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with GOODMAN, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. MI-2010-09-07-16 | Marquette County - 2007

   Typical pattern of soils and parent material in the Goodman-Sundog-Greenwood association (Soil Survey of Marquette County, Michigan; 2007).

2. WI-2012-03-23-17 | Marinette County - February 1991

   Pattern of soils and parent material in the Sarona-Keweenaw association (Soil Survey of Marinette County, WI; 1991).

Map Units

Map units containing GOODMAN as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Wabeno-Goodman silt loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	15C	184	1456017	2tnzv	mi053	2007	1:24000
Wabeno-Goodman silt loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	116D	44455	415881	2tnzv	mi071	1992	1:20000
Soperton-Goodman silt loams, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony	166F	8530	415902	2tnzw	mi071	1992	1:20000
Goodman-Wabeno-Sundog, sandy substratum complex, 6 to 18 percent slopes, stony	128D	6157	415895	fyrz	mi071	1992	1:20000
Goodman-Wabeno-Sundog, sandy substratum complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes, stony	128B	4076	415894	fyry	mi071	1992	1:20000
Goodman-Sundog, sandy substratum complex, 18 to 45 percent slopes, stony	128F	1736	415896	fys0	mi071	1992	1:20000
Goodman silt loam, 1 to 18 percent slopes, rocky, very stony	127D	388	415893	fyrx	mi071	1992	1:20000
Goodman-Sundog silt loams, 6 to 18 percent slopes, bouldery	107D	8371	394963	f7zr	mi103	1999	1:24000
Goodman-Sundog silt loams, 18 to 45 percent slopes, bouldery	107F	7509	394965	f7zt	mi103	1999	1:24000
Goodman-Sundog-Wabeno silt loams, 6 to 18 percent slopes, bouldery	108D	3943	394967	f7zw	mi103	1999	1:24000
Goodman-Sundog-Wabeno silt loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes, bouldery	108B	1976	394966	f7zv	mi103	1999	1:24000
Goodman-Sundog silt loams, 1 to 6 percent slopes, bouldery	107B	1899	394962	f7zq	mi103	1999	1:24000
Stambaugh-Goodman silt loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	SuC	3463	430055	gfhr	wi037	1995	1:12000
Goodman silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	GmC	3070	430007	gfg6	wi037	1995	1:12000
Wabeno-Goodman silt loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	WaC	2190	430064	2tnzv	wi037	1995	1:12000
Stambaugh-Goodman silt loams, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony	SuD	843	430056	gfhs	wi037	1995	1:12000
Soperton-Goodman silt loams, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony	SoD	782	430052	2tnzw	wi037	1995	1:12000
Goodman silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very stony	GmD	629	430008	gfg7	wi037	1995	1:12000
Wabeno-Goodman silt loams, 6 to 15 percent slopes, very stony	WaC	36698	429879	2tnzv	wi041	1995	1:12000
Soperton-Goodman silt loams, 15 to 35 percent slopes, very stony	SoD	13883	429868	2tnzw	wi041	1995	1:12000
Goodman silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes	GoC	3954	431620	gh47	wi069	1993	1:20000
Goodman silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	GmB	3887	422399	g5js	wi075	1987	1:20000
Goodman silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes	GmC	1448	422400	g5jt	wi075	1987	1:20000
Padus-Goodman complex, 6 to 15 percent slopes, stony	PbC	13161	421105	g461	wi085	1988	1:20000
Goodman silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes, stony	GoB	9873	421086	g45f	wi085	1988	1:20000
Goodman silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, stony	GoC	8381	421087	g45g	wi085	1988	1:20000
Padus-Goodman complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony	PbD	6039	421106	g462	wi085	1988	1:20000
Padus-Goodman complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes, stony	PbB	5602	421104	g460	wi085	1988	1:20000
Goodman silt loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony	GoD	2021	421088	g45h	wi085	1988	1:20000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the GOODMAN soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).